RE: svn commit: r232600 - /tomcat/watchdog/branches/tc3.3.x/WARNING.txt

Hi Mark, I believe the "tomcat_32" branch was the last "clean" build of watchdog for Tomcat 3.2.x and 3.3.x. I always used this branch for testing 3.3.x builds. Some refactoring was begun at HEAD for Tomcat 4.x which was never completed before that work moved to watchdog40. Larry > -Origin

RE: Problems with tomcat 3.3.2 and IBM JRE 1.3.0

Eduardo, The first problem looks like the bug in JDK 1.3.x ResourceBundle handling (I can't recall the bug number). I believe to work around this you should create "classes" directory under your installation's "lib/common" directory. Then extract the "org/apache/tomcat/util/net/res/LocalStrings

RE: Servlet and JSP APIs in java repository

Yoav, I did a quick check of servlet-api.jar in Tomcat 5.5.9. In its MANIFEST.MF, the "Implementation-Version" says "2.4.public_draft". Looks like the "implementation.revision" property in the build.xml files for both jsr152 and jsr154 still say "public_draft". Larry > -Original Message

RE: [VOTE] Propose Jim Jagielski and William A. Rowe as JakartaTomcatConnectors commiters

+1 for both. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:56 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Propose Jim Jagielski and William A. Rowe as > JakartaTomcatConnectors commiters > > I'd like to nominate J

RE: New committer: Peter Rossbach

+1 Larry -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 9:05 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: New committer: Peter Rossbach Hi, I'd like to nominate Peter Rossbach as a committer on the Tomcat project. Peter submitted a significan

RE: New RM for Tomcat 5

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:43 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: New RM for Tomcat 5 > > > Hi, > > Yoav has expressed interest in being the release manager for > Tomcat 5. > Since he has show

RE: Tomcat 4.1.30 admin application problem

Jeff, It appears that the 4.1.30-LE-jdk14 versions were built later with the correct code. I was only able to duplicate the problem with the non-LE versions. So the workaround for now is to use the 4.1.30-LE-jdk14 version if possible, or copy the tomcat-coyote.jar from an LE version to the non-L

RE: [Vote] Guenter Knauf as commiter

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Vote] Guenter Knauf as commiter > > > Hi to all, > > jk2 2.0.4 seems in a good shape and I'd like to thanks all of > you commiter,

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problemsin the adminapplication

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:26 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: allowTrace attribute causing problemsin the > adminapplication > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Sor

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problemsin the adminapplication

Sorry, bad assumption on my part. I was looking out for the 4.1.30 tag in jakarta-tomcat-4.0 and didn't realize that jakarta-tomcat-connectors had been tagged the day before. Since a 4.1.31 isn't likely, I'll prepare a patch to correct this for 4.1.30. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message-

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

Hi Jeff, I tested this before the 4.1.30 release, and just retested it, and it continues to work for me without your patch. Since the protocolHandler doesn't support the "allowTrace" property, the setProperty() is unnecessary in Tomcat 5.0.x and shouldn't make a difference in Tomcat 4.1.30. It i

RE: Tomcat 3.3.2-dev current build is available

ry between runs, or nothing works. > Having done that, > the failures fall into two categories: > 1) Expecting "HTTP/1.0 200 OK", Got "HTTP/1.1 200 OK". > 2) Expecting that javax.servlet.jsp.tagext is imported by > default (which is > wrong). > > I think th

Tomcat 3.3.2-dev current build is available

TTP/1.1". Cheers, Larry __ Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Java Development Environment SAS Institute Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [5.0.19] Release vote

For 3.3.2, I have the scripts basically working. The current result may be found here: http://www.apache.org/~larryi/tomcat-3.3.2-dev/ I have a couple of changes I need to push to handle the query string character encoding regression. As to how/if to port the URLEncoding and UseBodyEncodingFor

RE: [VOTE] Release the HEAD of j-t as Tomcat 3.3.2

> -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:42 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Release the HEAD of j-t as Tomcat 3.3.2 > > > The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until > Thursday,

RE: [PROPOSAL] Release the HEAD of j-t as Tomcat 3.3.2

+1 for the plan. Removing "src/native" from the source distribution won't be a problem. I would also be in favor of deleting the src/native/mod_jk from the CVS tree since this was moved long ago to jakarta-tomcat-connectors. If someone really wants that old version, they can grab an old source d

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/log CommonLogHandler.java Log.java LogHandler.java LogManager.java

+1 for just adding them back. Since they previously existing in j-t, they may come back with their old history. I'm not enough of a CVS expert to say for sure. I don't know of any trick to merge histories. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent

RE: servlet-api for watchdog

If it helps, you can find an archive here: /x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-3/bin Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: servlet-api for watchdo

RE: jk2 2.0.4 release plan

Hi Bill, Thanks for all your help with Tomcat 3.3.x. A proposal would be a good start towards a Tomcat 3.3.2 release. I'm taking it as a given that there is sufficient interest for at least one more 3.3 release. If the proposal includes switch from the old style release to Tomcat 4/5's new styl

RE: [VOTE] 4.1.30 release vote

My first attempt to vote appears to have gotten lost in all the virus e-mails. Here is my +1. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:05 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] 4.1.30 release vote > >

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/connector EditConnectorAction.java SaveConnectorAction.java

Hi Bill, My updates to admin didn't include defining a new selection list, but it looks like the following line in EditConnectorAction might be a good place to start: connectorFm.setBooleanVals(Lists.getBooleanValues()); I would guess that the Lists class is where you would add your new list

RE: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-5 jsr154 Spanish resource strings

Forgot that the attachments don't come through. I'll attach them to: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26039 Cheers, Larry -Original Message----- From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

[PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-5 jsr154 Spanish resource strings

from *nix. Thanks. Cheers, Larry ______ Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Java Development Environment SAS Institute Inc. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties

Mark, For backwards compatibility, I think the restrictions to the TLD location need to follow the spec level used by the web application. Since JSP 1.1 didn't include much in the way of restrictions, I know of some legacy Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 webapps that would fail these restrictions if deployed

RE: 5.next + 4.1.x future

+1 I'll look at porting CoyoteAdapter.convertURI() to 4.1.x this weekend, which I think will finish up synching the connector behavior with 5.0.x. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:53 AM > To: Tomcat

RE: [PATCH] Japanese Resource Updates for Tomcat 5

I think I got all of the changes. Let me know if I missed anything. Thanks. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Kazuhiro Kazama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Japanese Resource Updates for Tomca

RE: Tomcat 3.3.2 release question - was RE: [5.0.15] Testbuild available

e session if trying to do the reverse. I don't know if there are configuration options that affect this behavior. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Eduardo Campoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lar

Re: Tomcat 3.3.2 release question - was RE: [5.0.15] Test build available

Unfortunately Tomcat 3.3.2 suffers from a release manager who can't seem to get out of an overworked state in his day job. I still intend to do a 3.3.2 release when I can find the time, but it is hard to predict when that will be given that my day job necessarily takes priority. Cheers, Larry P.

RE: Justification for URIEncoding addition?

bject: Re: Justification for URIEncoding addition? > > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > > >> Hi Remy, > >> > >> Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete > this thread, > >> I'll assume the fo

RE: Justification for URIEncoding addition?

continues to work if you need to get a release out. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:26 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Justification for URIEncoding addition? > >

RE: Justification for URIEncoding addition?

. Thanks. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:02 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Justification for URIEncoding addition? > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Okay, I'

Justification for URIEncoding addition?

opriate. I would also recommend the old behavior be the default as I think that would lead to fewer complaints on tomcat-user. Sorry to raise this issue again so late. Thoughts? Cheers, Larry P.S. I haven't studied Bug 22666 yet. I'll take a look and see if there is something to lear

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Mark Thomas

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:19 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Mark Thomas > > > Hi, > > I'd like to nominate Mark Thomas as a Tomcat committer. He has > contibut

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteRequest.java

Hi Jan, This looked like a good idea, so I ported it to Tomcat 4.1.x. I'll go ahead and un-port it for consistincy with Tomcat 5. Larry > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http Parameters.java

Original Message- > From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:26 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/htt > p Parameters.java > > > Thank

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http Parameters.java

; Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/htt > p Parameters.java > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > I couldn't find anything in Tomcat 4 that calls > > Parameters.setQueryStringEncoding(). I assume at le

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http Parameters.java

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:43 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/htt > p Parameters.java >

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http Parameters.java

Hi All, Sorry to pipe up so late on this, but a recent re-org still has me still swamped at work. I'm not sure if the patch below is doing exactly what was intended. I am unable to get the servlet example provided by Mirek Hankus in: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24557

RE: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?

I'll work on upgrading my build. Thanks. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:22 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ? > > > Larry I

RE: TC 3.3.2

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:23 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: TC 3.3.2 > > > Bill Barker a écrit : > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Tomca

RE: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?

I have my 3.3.2-dev builds running again. Currently it uses the MAIN branch of JTC to build "util" and the coyote_10 branch to build coyote/http11. Once upon a time, I thought there was a reason that 3.3.2-dev couldn't use MAIN for coyote. I'm not sure what that reason was or wether it still appl

RE: TC 3.3.2

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:56 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: TC 3.3.2 > > > Hi to all, > > I commited the last part of clean imports and started to take > a look at bugzilla where many reports se

RE: AJP13 in TC 3.3.2-dev

No. You only need to worry about JTC. The 3.3.2-dev version source will be removed. Larry -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:42 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: AJP13 in TC 3.3.2-dev Did we still use in TC 3.3.2-

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.2.txt

+1, Thanks. Larry -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:49 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.2.txt Larry Isaacs a écrit : > Hi Henri, > > The software I work

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.2.txt

Hi Henri, The software I work on in my day job has finally reached "lockdown". Only documentation tasks remain. I'll try to get up to speed with with where things stand and begin working on a release plan this week. Sorry for the long delay. Larry -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.0 release plan

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:17 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.0 release plan > > > I have updated the dates mentioned in the release plan (given that > Tomcat 5 can't go to beta bef

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

succeed while preventing malicious uses of "%2F" from also succeeding. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Larry Isaacs > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:02 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jaka

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

> -Original Message- > From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:51 AM > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c > > > Larry, > > > > > Thanks. The r

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

Thanks. The restored mod_jk behavior is the same as Tomcat 3.3.x with , the default. Unsafe escapes give 403's. We can add a similar option to mod_jk to turn off the checking. Though, I can't image a situation where it would make sense to accept the risks to gain access to these escapes. Chee

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

I've haven't looked at the full source in a while, so I'm somewhat guessing at the exact impact. I'm working on a Tomcat 3.3.2 release plan which will need to integrate use of the J-T-C connectors. I should be able to take a more in depth look at this as part of that. I wouldn't see it as a step

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

the chain isn't going to serve it statically? Larry > -Original Message----- > From: Larry Isaacs > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:17 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c &g

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

Hi Nacho, My brain is isn't firing on all cylinders at the moment, but this makes me a little nervous. I think some of the problems in the past have been where malicious escaping would prevent request from being forwarded to Tomcat, and would be served statically. > -Original Message- >

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-catalina

Is there an update to MBeanUtils? My local Gump is getting: [javac] Compiling 306 source files to \Gump\Base\jakarta-tomcat-catalina\build\server\classes [javac] C:\Gump\Base\jakarta-tomcat-catalina\catalina\src\share\org\apache\catalina\core\StandardContext.java:4441: createObjectName

RE: Trying to fix Gump

bject: Re: Trying to fix Gump > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:57 PM > Subject: Re: Trying to fix Gump > > > > Larry Isaacs

RE: Trying to fix Gump

can make additional changes later if that assumption proves incorrect. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Trying to fix Gump > > > Larry

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads ThreadPool.java ThreadPoolMX.java

gt; Subject: RE: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/thr > eads ThreadPool.java ThreadPoolMX.java > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > > Hi Costin, > > > > jtc/util still contains org.apache.tomcat.util.mx.DynamicMBeanProxy &

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads ThreadPool.java ThreadPoolMX.java

Hi Costin, jtc/util still contains org.apache.tomcat.util.mx.DynamicMBeanProxy which imports "javax.management.*". Is the intent to update or remove this class so the dependency on JMX can be removed? Thanks. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Trying to fix Gump

I'm trying to get Gump working with respect to jakarta-tomcat* projects. I need to know which projects are intended to be dependent on jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10. Currently, jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 project lists tomcat-catalina as a dependent project, in addition to jakarta-tomcat. Is the coyote_

RE: [ANN] Security update: Apache Tomcat 3.3.1a released

ecause a > -1 is pointless > now :). The 3.3 branch needs to have a 3.3.2 release, and > IMHO, a 3.3.1a > release is just a waste of time. > > - Original Message - > From: "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[

[ANN] Security update: Apache Tomcat 3.3.1a released

Tomcat 3.3.1a has been released to address the following two vulnerabilities found in Tomcat 3.3.1 and earlier. This includes Tomcat 3.2.4 and earlier. Tomcat 4.0.4, 4.0.6, 4.1.12, 4.1.18, and 4.1.19 have been checked and do not have these vulnerabilities. Vulnerability where, when used with JDK

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

+1 Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:15 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release > > > A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat 4.1.17 which > causes

RE: j-t-c/util, 3.3 and logging

I hope to spend some cycles advancing a Tomcat 3.3.2 release over the holidays. I'm not assuming I can finish, but hopefully a Tomcat 3.3.2 release can be made in January. I'll also try to get back up to speed with Tomcat 4 & 5 and J-T-C. I can try to help with the glog factory if I find time be

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:17 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik > > > I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a > committer on > the Tomcat project. Filip

RE: Nightly TC 3.3.x builds not working anymore?

Hi Sam, Thanks for the offer. However, since changes are infrequent, I like the idea building the occasional 3.3.2-dev version with the exact same script I will use to build a release version, one of these days. Hopefully, I'll be able to come up for air in the near future and help out a little

RE: Nightly TC 3.3.x builds not working anymore?

Hi Hans, The "3.3.x nightly" is currently run by hand so that the zips are built on Windows and the tar.gzs are build under Unix. I typically update it after I see changes come through. I'll run another build to get things more current, in case I have missed something. I hope to start helping mor

RE: New jakarta logo to be included in tomcat 3/4/5 ?

Hi Henri, I have no objection to updating Tomcat 3.3.x. Thanks. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:hgomez@;apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:41 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: New jakarta logo to be included in tomcat 3/4/5 ? > >

RE: Bug 13658

IMHO, the 1.1 requirement is by virtue of Tomcat 3.3 being a reference implementation for the Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 specs. I don't think all of Tomcat 3.3's features have to run under 1.1. Especially new features that come after 3 major JVM versions and almost two Servlet spec versions. I'm not in

RE: [VOTE] tomcat-commiters list

> -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] tomcat-commiters list > > > I would like to propose a new mailing list. > > The list will be closed to commiters only. The main

RE: [VOTE] [5.0] Milestones

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 10:12 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] [5.0] Milestones > > > Hi, > > Now that the first stable releases of Tomcat 4.1 are out (and > according > to reports

RE: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:02 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine

RE: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup

Now that mod_jk 1.2.0 is released, I'm fine with this. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat 3.3.2 cleanup > > > If everybody agree, what about removing src

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

I'll try to commit this tonight. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:38 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates > > > Larry Isaacs

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

> -Original Message- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates > > > Larry Isaacs wrote: > > > > A first pass implem

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:55 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates > > > > > > I take a look at this module and I

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

ED]> > > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:38 AM > > Subject: Re: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates > > > > > > > >>Larry Isaacs wrote: > >> > >>>Hi Henri, &

RE: [POLL] Tomcat 3.3.2 updates

Hi Henri, I would prefer to minimize the impact of upgrading from 3.3.1 to 3.3.2. I agree with Costin that using 4 with documentation on the steps to enable the MxInterceptor would be a resonable way to implement this. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMA

RE: [VOTE] [4.0.5] [4.1.12] Security releases

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:05 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] [4.0.5] [4.1.12] Security releases > > > A security vulnerability which affects all releases of Tomcat 4.x has > been disc

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/shell tomcat.bat tomcat.sh

Hi Bill, Sorry to take so long to reply. I agree with your 3,1,2 order. However, I confess that I'm not sure I have a good handle on the disadvantages of going with 1 instead of 3. I'll see if I can form a more informed opinion this weekend. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From:

RE: Tomcat 3.3 repository changes

I'm starting to get a little more free time, and will try to put together a plan for Tomcat 3.3.2 in the next few weeks. AFAIK, there is little or no duplication between TC3.3.x's util classes and JTC's util classes. What was moved to JTC has been removed from TC3.3.x. Cheers, Larry > -Ori

RE: Modifying Tomcat to have WEB-INF/config in Classpath

It is not clear why adding WEB-INF/config to the webapp classpath is necessary or why you would even want to. If you are simply trying to read a properties file: <% java.util.Properties props = new java.util.Properties(); props.load(application.getResourceAsStream( "/WEB-I

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Jean-Francois Arcand

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Luby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:29 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Jean-Francois Arcand > > > I would like to propose that we add Jean-François Arcand as a Tomcat > commi

RE: propsed org.apache.tomcat.modules.aaa.AccessInterceptor fix for security-constraint

Hi Tony, This has been on the to-do list for a while. I'll try to take a look at this is the near future. My day job has me swamped at the moment. Thanks. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:06 PM

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 gump.xml

Committed. Sorry I can't be of more help. I'm going on vacation next week, so I'm rushing to commit all the changes that are likely to break things in my day job before I go. :-) Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories

A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi 3. [ ] Other: B) Catalina 2.0 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0 4. [ ] Other: C) Coyote 2.0 1. [X] Yes, u

RE: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:57 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal > > > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

Before we roll releases, it sure would be nice if some version info could be included in the MANIFEST.MFs. It has been difficult tracking various versions of servlet.jar, especially Servlet 2.2 versions. I'll work on a patch to submit this weekend. Larry > -Original Message- > From: Crai

RE: jk 1.2 freese/snap time in JTC ?

Hi Henri, I haven't been very active of late with Tomcat 3.3.x due to being too busy with other things right now. I'm not sure when I would find the time for JTC RM duties at this moment. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesd

RE: Tomcat/IIS Integration url request.getParameter()

Matt, I recall there being a bug related to this in the isapi_redirect.dll for Tomcat 3.3. For security, the dll normalizes the URI before checking to see if it should be forwarded to Tomcat. If the URI was shortened because of this normalization, the query parameters would be lost. This is fi

RE: [PROPOSAL] Change to the 3.3 API

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 2:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Change to the 3.3 API > > > I'd like to add a new method (for now called 'preInitCheck') > to the API to > be called befor

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Denis Benoit

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 10:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Denis Benoit > > > I'd like to propose Denis Benoit as > a committer on > the Tomcat project. Denis has con

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat RELEASE-NOTES-3.3.2.txt

Hi Henri, I haven't thought that far. I'm pretty swamped at the moment. Soon I expect to have nightly builds working on a regular basis. Hopefully, in the not too distant future I can review what is appropriate to do and submit a plan. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ H

RE: [PROPOSAL] Option to 3.3 to allow internal Welcome Files

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Option to 3.3 to allow internal Welcome Files > > > I've finally managed to patch StaticInterceptor to be able to process >

Question on JTC native/apache2.0 mod_jk.c

I tracked down the source of the hang I was seeing running Tomcat 3.3's internal test with Apache 2.0. It turns out the native/Apache2.0 mod_jk.c code: /* Use per/thread pool ( or "context" ) to reuse the endpoint. It's a bit faster, but I don't know how to deal with load

RE: [PROPOSAL] tag mod_jk 1.2.1

35 with mod_jk1 from jtc ? > > > > - > Henri Gomez ___[_] > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 > > > > >-Original Messag

RE: [PROPOSAL] tag mod_jk 1.2.1

I'm finding that the Apache2 mod_jk1 on Windows hangs on the first test run by test.jsp in Tomcat 3.3.x's admin app. I didn't finish tracking down the cause over the weekend. Is anyone else seeing this problem? Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Add a target in build.xml

Hi, Are you referring to TC 4.x or TC 3.3.x? I haven't updated the README yet to cover the dependency on jakarta-tomcat-connectors. But AFAIK, that is the only external requirement to build the jakarta-tomcat HEAD distribution, excluding options. It builds for me with just the jakarta-tomcat-co

RE: [PROPOSAL] tag mod_jk 1.2.1

+1 Though I need this weekend to make sure Win32 versions are building and running successfully. Apache 1.3 and IIS seem to be okay now, but I still need to check the others. Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002

RE: [VOTE] tomcat 4 rpm to re-use standard listening ports ?

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] tomcat 4 rpm to re-use standard listening ports ? > > > Hi, > > As you may know, the current tomcat 4 rpm change > all the li

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Christopher St John

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Christopher St John > > > I'd like to propose Christopher St John distributopia.com> as a > committer

RE: [4.0.4] [VOTE] Beta 3 release

I'll have the 3.3.2 builds back online shortly, so I should have some time to help. I'll add my +1. If there is a specific issue you need me to help with, let me know. Cheers, Larry -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 4/29/2002 4:07 PM To: T

  1   2   3   4   >