On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:29:58PM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
> >> After getting errors from "apachectl configtest" relating
> >>to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got
> >>an error that Port directive had
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:34:55AM -0800, Charles Yates wrote:
>After getting errors from "apachectl configtest" relating
> to invalid port I added a Port directive to httpd.conf and got
> an error that Port directive had been replaced by Listen. I then
> removed my Port directive, hacked on
Gets rid of lame warnings against latest httpd-2.0 and APR.
-- justin
Index: webapp/apache-2.0/mod_webapp.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0/mod_webapp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 07:25:40PM -0500, GAWLAS,JULIUS (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
> This patch contains minor fixes for mod_jk for Apache 2.0;
>
> Most important is the change in prototype of jk_post_config
> which used to be void but now needs to return success code,
> also changes to types o
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:32:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> You could try:
>
> LIBS="-Lgcc" \
> LDFLAGS=-R/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 \
> ./configure --enable-module=rewrite --enable-shared=rewrite
Ack, I meant -lgcc not -Lgcc. Fre
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote:
> Tricky beast it is!
>
> I installed gcc 3.0.1 using the sunfreeware package and it looks like
> it's sticking the lib files in
> /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.0.1 so:
>
> To configure Apache I'm doing:
>
> LDFLAGS=-R
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote:
> Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for
> mod_webapp.
Then, just add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0.1/lib to your LDFLAGS for
httpd.
(Using gcc-3.0.1 on Solaris is a really tricky beast because
gcc doesn't add the -R flags
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:15:07AM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote:
> Syntax error on line 206 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_webapp.so into server:
> ld.so.1: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
> /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_weba
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 09:22:02AM -0600, Brian P Millett wrote:
> Quick Synopsis of error (apache 2.0):
> Syntax error on line 2 of /opt/apache/conf/mod_webapp.conf:
> Invalid port number (p<1) No "Port" statement found
Oooh, I bet it is related to the change that we committed to set
port to 0 i
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First of all I attempt to calmly summarize the problem and only then let my emotions
>get through.
>
> My insufficient knowledge of AIX platforms prevents me from successfully compiling
>mod_webapp (as well mod_jk) on AIX 4.3
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:16:18AM -0800, Michael Jennings wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm working on a project for a client that involves a servlet engine component. I
>suggested tomcat
> since I am most familiar with it and it seems the most compliant servlet engine
>around.
> My client has men
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:55:51PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote:
> I'm also having the same problem with libgcc when I try and build and
> compile my own mod_jk.
>
> Any pointers on where libgcc should be so that Apache/mod_xx finds it would
> be appreciated.
Add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0/lib to your LDFLAG
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:53PM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote:
> I'll grab the latest CVS and see how that works.
>
> The buildconf.sh in jk/native/Apache-2.0 runs libtoolize, automake, aclocal
> and autoconf. Cygwin includes all of these except libtool. I built it and
> installed it into /usr
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:29:41AM -0500, Marc Saegesser wrote:
> Here's an update on where I stand right now on building/running mod_jk for
> Apache 2.0 beta 16.
Please don't use Apache 2.0.16. Use the latest version from CVS.
Also, I'm not sure where automake is coming from - we don't use tha
I finally got a chance to build mod_webapp from j-t-c with Apache 2.0.
Looks good and is quite easy to do. Only problem is that we aren't
handling directories properly. If you do the examples webapp, you
see a link to:
http://localhost:8080/examples/servlets/
Going there results in a bad res
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:49:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think option 2 ( in-process ) is what mod_jk is doing - the code has
> been written and used quite a bit in the last year. It didn't got all the
> attention that Ajp got, because it doesn't work with Apache1.3, only
> with IIS
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:41:10AM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
> ***
> Tomcat can be used as either a stand-alone container (mainly for development and
>debugging) or as an add-on to an existing web server
> s are supported). This means that whenever you are deploying Tomcat you will have t
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 01:46:37PM -, Shailesh S. Gokhale wrote:
> 1. I understand that Tomcat can work with any (supported) web
> server in two modes - 'In Proc' and 'Out of Proc'. I have
> successfully configured Tomcat (Out of Proc) to work with Apache.
> The question is how can I make i
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:50:27AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I've just commited updated code for Apache 1.3/2.0
>
> I will need a serious code review on Apache 2.0 part
> and particulary the ws_read() which was grabbed from
> 1.3 and works (at least on Apache 2.0.24) but may
>
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that nobody
> will actually care unless they're testing something... And by "testing" good
> practice says "get the HEAD of CVS and try it out yourself if it doesn't
>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:48:56PM -0600, Christopher Cain wrote:
> Oh well ... as an unrepentant terminal geek, I'm glad I took the time to
> learn it on the command line. Like most Linux commands, it has a pretty
> steep learning curve, but once you're familiar with it it's really quite
> powerf
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 05:46:28AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> costin 01/08/27 22:46:28
>
> Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/test Header.java
> HttpRequest.java
> Log:
> Fixes in the test suite. We must send 1.0 requests, since we can't handle
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 10:24:30PM -0700, Jason Hunter wrote:
> So what does the Apache Web Server do for PATH_INFO on a request to
> http://foo.com/cgi-bin/somecgi/http://extra.com?
Ask for /index.html/http://extra.com with httpd-2.0, it strips out the
second /.
(gdb) print r->path_info
$5 = 0x
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:51:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> craigmcc01/08/21 11:51:52
>
> Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
> StandardServer.java
> Log:
> Fix for a DoS attack against the shutdown port, that could cause an "out
>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:54:43AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> I'm not sure I would make quite so blanket a statement as that. If the
> servlet itself understands that the content it produces changes rarely, it
> can improve performance by respecting If-Modified-Since values. To make
> t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
>
> yes. I analyzed the HTTP header that's being sent and received by the
> browser.
> If-Modified-Since messages are sent to tomcat, and we are dealing with
> static files here (javascript and images).
> So is tomcat doesn't have the '3
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:18:53AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
>
> I have noticed that after applying the patch the date is now
> included in the tomcat HTTP response header, but it still
> does not send back "not modified 304" if the file requested
> hasn't been modified since the date specificed by
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 11:16:52AM -0700, Mark Castillo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ok. After reading through some of the sources some questions came to mind.
> What are some of the specific goals of the project regarding robustness,
> performance, and security? At what point can we say that it is robus
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:56:45AM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> I am concerned that the loss of original escaping
> will break somebody. For instance:
As Costin pointed out, the escaping of a URI does not change its
semantics - they should be treated as identical by anyone who follows
the UR
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 11:13:34PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> Costin's right.. seems like the problem encountered
> was that there was no way to recreate the encoding
> (or lack thereof) on the original uri. So the
> kludge/solution was to use the unparsed uri and
> chop off the query str
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 08:12:31PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > Which, of course, is the right solution.
>
> Is it ? Re-escaping the URI will most likely generate something very
> different from the original, it'
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 03:41:30AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I wonder how Pier is addressing this in mod_webapp. I'll have to
> > look. -- justin
>
> Easy as 1.2.3... WARP has a concept of URI a
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:25:32PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately there are people who were breaking because
> > we didn't follow the spec. The better way to fix it is
> > to create an inverse function for
> > ap
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Keith Wannamaker wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Unfortunately there are people who were breaking because
> we didn't follow the spec. The better way to fix it is
> to create an inverse function for
> ap_parse_uri(request_rec *r, const char *uri) [http_protocol.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:13:24PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> --- mod_jk.c.orig Tue Aug 14 17:58:21 2001
> +++ mod_jk.cTue Aug 14 18:04:58 2001
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@
> s->method = (char *)r->method;
> s->content_length = get_content_length(r);
> s->query_string = r->
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:25:03PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:17:18AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >> I have tested it with 1.3.20 it behaves the same way.
> >
> > Th
[ CCing dev@apr ]
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:56:58PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Klaus Sonnenleiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Has anybody successfully compiled mod_webapp and/or the APR library on
> > Solaris? I was able to compile everything without any trouble on a RedHat
> > 7.1
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:16:27AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Checking out the source code, I see a lot of // (commented out lines) when
> debug() is supposed to be called...
> Can't we have a global constant boolean called DEBUG and replace the // with
> if (DEBUG), so that we can simply c
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:29:31PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I would advise to use a tagged version of APR in mod_webapp. Using the lastest
> one is/was not a good idea.
>
> I am using the APR tagged "APACHE_2_0_20" for testing mod_webapp and it compiles
> Ok at least on 2 of test plate
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> I have an old pre-sms version of APR I'm using, and it seems it's working on
> most platforms "as-is"... I might ask the APR guys to tag it with
> "MOD_WEBAPP_1_0", or redistribute it in a nice tarball...
Ha! -- justin
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:28:25PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The CVS I have does not compile because apr_socket_create()... It misses the
> inherit parameter!
> APR has added it to the apr_socket_create(). Should I fix it or just tell we
> need a tagged APR (like APACHE_2_0_20).
I think
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> I just tried it on Nagoya, and it does the same for me...
> Do someone has _ANY_ clue of WTF is going on
Yeah, I've seen this before (Solaris, too). I had to add -lgcc.
Don't ask me why the linker didn't pick up on that a
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:21:55PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> > I had to work around some issues with that OS myself writing the Service
> > code, and definitely, I wouldn't trust that "thing" not even to drive my
> > coffee pot, but, of course, that's me. Get a decent and "real" OS, don'
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:10:42PM +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> "Swart, James (Jim) ** CTR **" wrote:
> >
> > why is it everyone has such a hard time getting off this list? Someone put
> > me in charge of getting people off the jarkata maillists, I'll make sure
> > it's done to ensure these fl
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:38:55PM -0700, Si Ly wrote:
> I submitted a very simple patch last week, and I haven't heard from
> anyone about it. It seems to me that "outsiders" (non-committers)
> can't get anything into CVS because the committers are not looking at
> the patches, for whatever reas
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:09:44PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >Realistically though, APR is fairly stable API-wise. There *are*
> >going to be some minor changes and tweaks along the way. But, they
> >should all be for the better (like the util_date migration).
>
> I'm confident that APR is
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:29:39AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> APR will be the future, but it still in changing state.
> Do you want to works on a moving API ?
> We need a release and binary builds for majors OS
When I have commit access to APR, yeah, I do. =) (That change to the
util_dat
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> so is there still interest in a patch for the mod_webapp docs or has focus
> been shifted over to mod_jk?
I'd like to see a patch, but that's me. =) Pier probably can tell you
what he's doing with mod_webapp. I'm not a fan of mod_j
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 11:13:24PM +0100, hiten pandya wrote:
> hi everyone...
>
> hope everyones is fine,
>
> i have downloaded the latest copy of the tomcat server from the cvs
> repository,
Please see:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.ht
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:38:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please don't take this personally - I put some (free) time into
> this, and if I don't like your solution doesn't mean I consider you an
> "idiot" ( or that I'll not use the same solution, as it's considerably
> easier to impleme
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:41:52AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> So who will be interested in working on the Tomcat Documentation ?
I'd be willing to proofread and validate any docs for the j-t-c (i.e.
Apache/Tomcat integration). I don't have time to actually write the
docs, but I could conceivabl
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:21:52PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> i care very much about mod_webapp. er, well, to be more clear, i care very
> much about having an apache-tomcat connector module that doesn't require
> me to put the same configuration data in two completely different places.
> i presu
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:49:15AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> I've checked out actually in detail what APR does for building itself, and a
> lot of resourceful information can be found also in build/rules.mk, that
> gets generated by the APR configure script... I believe that using that an
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:03:47AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Yup, that's what httpd-2.0 does. Just require them to slap the apr
> > sources in srclib (or something like that).
>
> We don't have
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all
> would have to offer on this. so close, and yet...
As Pier said, just add ServerName.
Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs.
I'd
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:
> Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Justin Erenkrantz at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> >>> strange, li
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:09:31PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> strange, libapr seems to include libmm, but i went ahead and built and
> installed libmm seperately in /usr/local/lib. okay, geez, now i get this
> error:
It includes it, but mod_webapp doesn't link it. It seems that Pier is
whipping
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
> > apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
> > advantage of APRVARS (wh
You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See
apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking
advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't
seem to be doing so. -- justin
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Thu, 28 J
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 08:52:03AM -0500, kevin seguin wrote:
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > I'm using tab = 4 so +1 there.
> >
>
> it's important to make the distinction between indent level and number
> of spaces per tab -- they are totally different. i'm for 4 space indent
> level, tabs set t
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:17:37PM -0500, kevin seguin wrote:
> so, is there a tabs policy in jakarta? like the number of spaces per
> tab (4 vs. 8), of no tabs in source code? i ask because i just got the
> latest jtc source, and when i open up some of the files in emacs (in
> which i have tab
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Gomez Henri wrote:
> webapp: mod_webapp/warp protocol (only ajp14)
( Fodder for a STATUS file... )
FWIW, redirects are broken with mod_webapp. This is due to the fact
that mod_webapp isn't passing enough information to the Java side about
the requested
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:28:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> mod_jk support Apache 2.0
>
> And TC 4.0 as preliminary support for ajp13 used
> in mod_jk.
>
> Could you take a look at it ?
Okay, what's the difference between mod_webapp and mod_jk? I thought
that mod_webapp was the preferred TC
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:39:58AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I made a first try some months ago and get it started on a non-threaded machine,
> by adding #define APACHE20 but the code has evolved a lot from that time. Should
> I try again in the today code?
If you've got time. You migh
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:34:17PM -0400, Salim Virani wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> I faced a similar problem. I figured I could write my own server/servlet API
> .. which is what I did.
>
> Just curious was your implementation in Java ??? And are you working
> for a company or this is some scho
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Fabian Loschek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I would like Tomcat to serve requests for a new Internet Draft Protocol
> > named ICAP. The intension is to develop HTTP like ICAP servlet base classes
> > to allow writing ICAP applications.
> >
> > Can someone give m
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:57:16AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Now which webservers are you using :
>
> - Apache 1.3 (Apache, Apache/SSL or Apache-mod_ssl)
> - Apache 2.0
> - Domino
> - IIS 4/5/2000
> - JNI
> - Netscape/IPlanet
>
> This quick poll will help us know on which direction
[ CCed to dev@apr ]
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:32:25PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> (4) Tested configuration (/etc/rc.d/init.d/apache configtest) and got
> the following error message:
>
> Syntax error on line 1027 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/local
68 matches
Mail list logo
