Re: Request to Fix Tomcat Standalone 302 redirect Issue

2003-02-17 Thread Donald Ball
Tim Funk wrote: A patch (which I didn't look at yet) could introduce the following: - Bypassing a security contraints, eg:index.jsp is protected but / isn't - Vulnerabilities - Through a wacky optimizations, other pages might get accidently exposed Just curious... I assume the patch uses Requ

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
>The key issue is that declaring an handler ***replaces*** the >standard container behavior; it doesn't ***augment*** it. > >Consider, for example, a webapp that want to implement something like what >the "Redirect" configuration parameter does for Apache (so that old URLs >still work). In today'

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
On 1/2/2003 at 9:23 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >> Nonetheless, I think the patched behavior is much more correct than the >> current behavior and should be applied to cvs. >> > >(Sorry for being out of touch earlier -- holidays and busyness and such). > >I do not agree with the assertion that t

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote: >It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). >Do you have a patch ? I have attached an erstwhile patch to the bug in bugzilla. It assumes the content type of the error-page resource to be text/html and uses rd.include inst

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-27 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote: >It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ). >Do you have a patch ? not yet, but i'll be happy to work on one for 4.1.x. thanks for taking the time to respond. - donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-23 Thread Donald Ball
Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way to interact with the at-large developer community. - donald On 12/19/2002 at 12:13 PM Donald Ball wrote: >On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Alges

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-19 Thread Donald Ball
On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten wrote: >The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree >it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A >BUGIT NEEDS FIXING! Thank you - now I at least know that other people have observed this behavior and

Fwd: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-19 Thread Donald Ball
What does one have to do to get a response to a bug report around here? I submitted it to bugzilla, I followed up here. If it's a bug, I'm happy to help patch. If I'm an idiot, I'd appreciate being told so. - donald On 12/18/2002 at 1:00 PM Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED

error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2002-12-18 Thread Donald Ball
I submitted this bug report a few days ago: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15406 It seems to me that tomcat is doing the wrong thing when it tags the error page contents with status code 200 instead of the actual error status code. If this is the case, is anyone interested in f

Fwd: bug found and fixed in jasper in 4.x cvs

2002-11-14 Thread Donald Ball
Is anyone interested in my (or, indeed, any) patch for this bug? I hate to have to maintain a locally bugfixed version of a (meritocratic?) open source project. - donald *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE *** On 11/12/2002 at 3:51 PM Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I

Re: JSPC refactoring/documentation

2002-11-13 Thread Donald Ball
On 11/12/2002 at 4:03 PM Costin Manolache wrote: >Fredrik Westermarck wrote: > >> The problem that I and others have experienced is that proposals and/or >> patches, by non-committers, don't get discussed or voted about. > >You have to keep pushing. If you send patches and proposals you can >becom

bug found and fixed in jasper in 4.x cvs

2002-11-12 Thread Donald Ball
I recently had the occasion to try and make jasper's JspC work for my webapp. Unfortunately, it was did not work out of the box. Fortunately, I was able to patch it to make it work. The problem is that my directory structure looks something like this: /WEB-INF/jsp/foo.jsp /WEB-INF/jsp/foo/bar.jsp

Re: please read -- need to specify current working directory

2001-07-08 Thread Donald Ball
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Victor Wynnytsky wrote: > [ WHY I NEED THIS ] > It is very common for an XSL page to include another XSL page. > An XSL page called "orderDetail.xsl" might begin like this... > > http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"; > version="1.0"> > > > > ... > > The focus of

Re: Question on HTTPConnector.

2001-07-07 Thread Donald Ball
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Well yes, it's bad, but so will any other reaction. What choices are > there in handling it? > > (1) Current behavior of closing the connection and go back to > accepting new connections (causes a client-side protocol error) > > (2) Pause and

Re: problem with redirects when using tomcat-4.0b5 and mod_jk (fwd)

2001-07-07 Thread Donald Ball
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Donald Ball wrote: > i've seen no responses to this issue. does anyone have any suggestions? > > - donald i thought i'd go ahead and take a gander at helping myself. after futilely trying to get catalina running in a debugger on linux (can anyone else do

problem with redirects when using tomcat-4.0b5 and mod_jk (fwd)

2001-07-07 Thread Donald Ball
i've seen no responses to this issue. does anyone have any suggestions? - donald -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 22:37:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: problem with redirects when using tomcat-4.0b5 and

RE: problems compling mod_jk for apache-1.3 on linux

2001-07-06 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > What about using my RPM ? i could do, but i wanted to try to get the latest cvs working. as it stands now, it doesn't build. is that to be expected? - donald

problem with redirects when using tomcat-4.0b5 and mod_jk

2001-07-05 Thread Donald Ball
hey guys. i'm getting a problem with redirects when i use tomcat-4.0b5 and mod_jk with the ajp13 connector. my stacktrace is as follows: Error creating the resourcejava.lang.IllegalArgumentExceptiontables/trouble_ticket_table/query?clause=active&clause=for-employeejava.lang.IllegalArgumentExcepti

problems compling mod_jk for apache-1.3 on linux

2001-07-05 Thread Donald Ball
i'm getting these errors with the latest cvs: [root@benjamin apache-1.3]# ./build-unix.sh APACHE_HOME=/usr/local/apache Compiling mod_jk gcc -DLINUX=2 -DMOD_SSL=206106 -DUSE_HSREGEX -DEAPI -DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite -fpic -DSHARED_CORE -DSHARED_MODULE -I/usr/local/apache/include -I../common

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-07-01 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote: > jeez... it's been a while since i've used ajp13 with tomcat 4 :) > > if memory serves... you want to add an ajp13 connector as a child of a > service, e.g.: > > > port="8009" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/> thanks, that works like

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Donald Ball
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > > well, it seems mod_jk supports > > the same 'autoconfig' mode as mod_webapp - and it did that since the > > beginning > > Sometimes I just wish to quit this whole shit and go working for Starbucks > (or Microsoft)... Thank you so much for pointing

RE: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >i tried putting a Host element underneath the Engine but it didn't like > >that at all. i think this must be wrong since i'm trying to > >associate an > >Ajp13Connector with a WarpEngine. how should this be configured? sorry, > >i've not been able to fin

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote: > okay, i've got apache talking to tomcat, but i always get this message: > > Tomcat Error Report > > HTTP Status 500 - No Host matches server name foobar.webslingerZ.com never mind, i fixed this problem. i have a new problem, but i

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > port="8009" acceptCount="10" debug="0"/> > > > > and i built mod_jk.so and put it in my libexec directory, but i don't know > > how to configure mod_jk in apache's httpd.conf for tomcat-catalina. do you > > have some configuration advi

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i care very much about mod_webapp. er, well, to be more clear, i care very > > much about having an apache-tomcat connector module that doesn't require > > me to put the same configuration data in two completely different places. > > i presume mod_

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Tomcat's HTTP standalone connector isn't very good at parsing HTTP > (but, I know the HTTP protocol too well to know where the pitfalls are). > IMHO, Tomcat shouldn't be allowed to be a web server on its own. It > needs a connector in front of it.

bugs in mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
new thread name since i've got me some real bugs to note, not just my stupid compilation and configuration problems. 1. when tomcat is restarted while apache is running, mod_webapp returns errors for all further tomcat requests. apache's error_log reports: [Thu Jun 28 23:45:55 2001] 17320 (pr_wa

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > It's _VERY_MUCH_ a work in progress... I am NOT DEFINITELY comfortable with > its code, and I'm the one who wrote it, soo :) :) :) heh. > All I can say is that right now I'm so happy to see that few people gave me > feedback on that piece of c

Re: problem with mod_webapp (fwd)

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all > > would have to offer on this. so close, and yet... > > As Pier said, just add ServerName. > > Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs. > I'd b

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > Oh, I believe you specified your WebAppDeploy _before_ your ServerName > directive... If you switch them it should be fine... aha! voila! WebAppInfo now works great, but WebAppDeploy still fails, i now get timeouts when i try to hit urls assigned t

Re: problem with mod_webapp (fwd)

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
hate to be plaintive, but i'd really appreciate any suggestions y'all would have to offer on this. so close, and yet... - donald -- Forwarded message -- with this in my httpd.conf: LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so AddModule mod_webapp.c WebAppConnection myConnectio

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so > > AddModule webapp_module > > AddModule mod_webapp.c suggest that y'all fix /webapp/docs/apache-1.3.html if that's the proper line - which it appears it is - i now get this: [root@chngw apache]# a

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 04:52:01PM -0400, Donald Ball wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See > > > apr/shmem/unix/mm/.li

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > You need to link against MM (static) to your compilation. See > apr/shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a. mod_webapp should be taking > advantage of APRVARS (which has this information). It doesn't > seem to be doing so. -- justin pardon my ignorance, w

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, kevin seguin wrote: > use a non-threaded apr with apache 1.3. thanks. i built apr with --disable-threads and now i get this: [root@chngw apr]# apachectl configtest Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_webapp

problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-28 Thread Donald Ball
hey guys. i'm trying to get the latest mod_webapp from cvs to work with the latest apr from cvs and apache-1.3.12. i'm getting this error when i try to test the configuration: [root@chngw lib]# apachectl configtest Syntax error on line 41 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/loc

[catalina] small patch for HexUtils

2001-04-16 Thread Donald Ball
i managed to make tomcat barf an exception when trying to use the JDBCRealm class. turns out that i needed to patch org.apache.catalina.util.HexUtils: [balld@localhost util]$ cvs diff HexUtils.java Index: HexUtils.java === RCS file:

small bug in catalina docs

2001-04-16 Thread Donald Ball
in /catalina/docs/JDBCRealm-howto.html, the documentation states: Using digested passwords To use digested password you need to store them digested. To achieve this, you will need to use the same digest strategies that JDBCrealm uses to store the passwords, inside JDBCRealm there is a static met