DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24882] - mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24882] - mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24882] - mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28072] New: - The TomCat can't be started.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28071] - New ArbitraryQueryJDBCRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28071] - New ArbitraryQueryJDBCRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28071] - New ArbitraryQueryJDBCRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28071] New: - New ArbitraryQueryJDBCRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Email account utilization warning.

Dear user, the management of Apache.org mailing system wants to let you know that, Some of our clients complained about the spam (negative e-mail content) outgoing from your e-mail account. Probably, you have been infected by a proxy-relay trojan server. In order to keep your computer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24882] - mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

hgomez 2004/03/30 13:50:11 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: gzip compression could also be used in HTTP 1.0 Revision ChangesPath 1.99 +5 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

Jess Holle wrote: Kin-Man Chung wrote: Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For instance, you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract. Ah, yes, you are correct. That can also be easily checked with an additional line of code, of course. However, I am sym

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

Kin-Man Chung wrote: Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For instance, you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract. Ah, yes, you are correct. That can also be easily checked with an additional line of code, of course. However, I am sympathetic to your

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

Your test for bad beans is much weaker than what it is now. For instance, you do not catch the case where the bean class is abstract. However, I am sympathetic to your view on this. If I can be convinced that we have covered all checks that we can do without too much trouble, I'll fix Jasper. -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime JspRuntimeLibrary.java

kinman 2004/03/30 11:18:43 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime JspRuntimeLibrary.java Log: - Fix bugzilla 28058: JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException Revision ChangesPath 1.30

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Are you using commons-daemon-1.0 or HEAD for jsvc? There is also a fix for a nasty bug with jsvc in the CVS. - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:42 AM Subject: Re: 5.0.21 ? Mlade

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28058] New: - JspRuntimeLibrary.getContextRelativePath() can throw StringIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

jean-frederic clere wrote: I think I have reproduced it with the following: +++ Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009 +++ The /examples/servlet/* uri has "/examples/servlet/*-1" for uri and match_type "suffix" sounds we

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24882] - mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcatw.exe tomcat.exe

mturk 2004/03/30 09:31:32 Modified:procrun/bin tomcatw.exe tomcat.exe Log: Latest binary builds Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +208 -63 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcatw.exe <> 1.8 +26 -24jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.rc

mturk 2004/03/30 09:29:12 Modified:procrun tomcat.rc Log: Add manifest resource for XP GUI style Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.rc Index: tomcat.rc ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.exe.manifest

mturk 2004/03/30 09:28:43 Added: procrun tomcat.exe.manifest Log: Add XP manifest file for XP style GUI Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.exe.manifest Index: tomcat.exe.manifest =

Re: container managed security

I searched for some time in various archives, bug databases, mailing lists etc trying to find this information but my searching basically always brings me back to here. All I want to do is set up container managed security to allow unencrypted sessions on protected resources, along with an SSL-

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_alias

Jess Holle wrote: Jess Holle wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=} I think I have reproduced it with the following: +++ Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009 +++ The

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ? 2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 --

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_alias

Jess Holle wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=} I think I have reproduced it with the following: +++ Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009 +++ The /examples/servlet/*

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_alias

jean-frederic clere wrote: Settings and test case of course more than welcome :=} I think I have reproduced it with the following: +++ Alias /examples /opt/SMAWoIS/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/examples JkUriSet group ajp13:pgtr0327:8009 +++ The /examples/servlet/* uri has "/examples/

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ? 2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an

RE: 5.0.21 ?

Hi, I've made and committed the changes to jakarta-tomcat-5/NOTICE, so we're all set for the release as far as the license requirements are concerned. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: Shapira, Yoav >Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:56 AM >To: Tomcat

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 NOTICE

yoavs 2004/03/30 07:20:06 Modified:.NOTICE Log: Added info about MX4J and NSIS to NOTICE file. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +11 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/NOTICE Index: NOTICE === RCS file:

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

I certainly know what a JavaBean is, Remy. First, *any* constructor can fail and throw an exception due to any number of factors -- including a JavaBean constructor. Second, I did not write the beans in question. I'm simply seeking to maintain reasonable resiliency in their handling. My propo

RE: 5.0.21 ?

Hi, >It's jakarta-tomcat-5. OK, will put there. >So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ? Short, for example: "Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package, which is open source software, written by Philip Hazel, and copyright by the University of Cambridge, England. Th

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Jess Holle wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ? 2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an old with old sort

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5/resources INSTALLLICENSE

remm2004/03/30 06:51:03 Modified:resources INSTALLLICENSE Log: - New license. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +201 -60 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/INSTALLLICENSE Index: INSTALLLICENSE === RCS fil

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Henri Gomez wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ? 2.0.49 on Windows. I have not tried Solaris or AIX yet. [I have not bothered with mod_jk2 with Apache 1.3 -- I just use mod_jk there on an old with old sort of principle.] I can

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5 instead, BTW. The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE) need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's unpacked. From where does the build dist take the

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 NOTICE build.xml LICENSE

remm2004/03/30 06:48:55 Modified:.build.xml LICENSE Added: .NOTICE Log: - Add NOTICE file is dists. Revision ChangesPath 1.182 +14 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Jess Holle wrote: Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... With Apache 1.3 or 2.0 ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

Jess Holle wrote: I'm not arguing with the overall intent of your change. Rather I believe that calling the constructor during compilation is wasteful and improper as the environment *can* differ between compilation and runtime. Also, the fact that a failure to compile in this fashion generat

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Sorry, I should have said mod_alias, not mod_dir... -- Jess Holle Jess Holle wrote: mod_jk2 2.0.4 seems to have the same issues that several mod_jk 1.2.x releases had with mod_dir. Specifically something like: Alias /MyWebApp "D:\my_app_view\Myapp/codebase" Options Indexes FollowS

Re: Tomcat 5.0.20 Issue

Kin-Man Chung wrote: I think your only valid point is the one about the need to make errorOnUseBeanInvalidClassAttribute be switchable from Jspc main, but we are not bundling jspc scripts anymore, so I didn't feel there is a need for it. Anyway, its value can be set with an ant task. Otherwise, J

RE: 5.0.21 ?

Hi, >Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5 >instead, BTW. The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE) need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's unpacked. From where does the build dist take the LICENSE/NOTI

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Note that we must properly reference MX4J and NSIS in our NOTICE file for this release. I see the file (in jakarta-tomcat-catalina/NOTICE) hasn't changed since I created it a month ago. If no one beats me to it, I'll make the changes later today. Ok. Yes, I heard about that.

Re: Lisa Hanly/STL/Brown Group is out of the office.

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, I'll unsubscribe and send a congratulations message! ;) Since I now also wield the Supreme Power (TM), I already unsubscribed her :) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional command

RE: 5.0.21 ?

Hi, Note that we must properly reference MX4J and NSIS in our NOTICE file for this release. I see the file (in jakarta-tomcat-catalina/NOTICE) hasn't changed since I created it a month ago. If no one beats me to it, I'll make the changes later today. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informati

RE: Lisa Hanly/STL/Brown Group is out of the office.

Hi, I'll unsubscribe and send a congratulations message! ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:40 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Lisa Hanly/STL/Brown Group is out

jk2: dependencies between logger.file and workerEnv

I've just produce a non-Windows version of the DSAPI (Lotus Domino) connector and I had a bit of a struggle getting the initialisation code right because of co-dependencies between workerEnv and logger.file. It seems that logger.file needs workerEnv to exist for it to initialise itself but the

Re: 5.0.21 ?

hurray!!! that is good to hear. peter Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: > I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our > binary dependencies (installer + JMX). > I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest > Jasp

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Mladen Turk wrote: Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he didn't done any jtc/procrun binary builds. I can do that but only later this evening. I can wait until later today for new binaries, no problem. Rémy - To

RE: 5.0.21 ?

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat > >>So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) > > > > That's really good news. > > Hope it'll last for a while :) > > BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ? > Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/tester/src/bin tester.xml

remm2004/03/30 04:34:42 Modified:tester/src/bin tester.xml Log: - Fix two tests after Jasper changes. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/tester/src/bin/tester.xml Index: tester.xml =

Re: Bug: jk2 2.0.4 vs. mod_dir

Jess Holle wrote: mod_jk2 2.0.4 seems to have the same issues that several mod_jk 1.2.x releases had with mod_dir. Specifically something like: Alias /MyWebApp "D:\my_app_view\Myapp/codebase" Options Indexes FollowSymLinks AllowOverride None deny from all

Re: Log4j classpath merging?

Hello Matthew, We have just added new code to log4j in order to provide a complete solution to the problem you are describing. It has several advantages over ContextClassLoaderSelector you mentioned. For more details, see http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4j/examples/tiny-webapp/ and

Lisa Hanly/STL/Brown Group is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 03/10/2004 and will not return until 06/02/2004. I am on maternity leave. You may email Margaret Smith, Marketing Manager of Dr. Scholl's Footwear at [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my absence. * [This me

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5/resources welcome.bin.html welcome.main.html

remm2004/03/30 03:23:21 Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES resources welcome.bin.html welcome.main.html Log: - Include jmx.jar again. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +1 -16 jakarta-tomcat-5/RELEASE-NOTES Index: RELEASE-NOTES =

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Mladen Turk wrote: From: Remy Maucherat I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the installer. So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) That's really good news. Hope it'll last for a while :) BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ? Rém

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.xml

remm2004/03/30 03:21:53 Modified:.build.xml Log: - Include jmx.jar again. Revision ChangesPath 1.181 +1 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jak

RE: 5.0.21 ?

> From: Remy Maucherat > I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J > and the installer. > So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) > That's really good news. Hope it'll last for a while :) MT. --

Re: 5.0.21 ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our binary dependencies (installer + JMX). I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag. I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the i

Re: A!p$ghsa

Please r564g!he4a56a3haafdogu#mfn3o Norton AntiVirus eliminato1.txt Description: plain/text - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]