Re: Procrun improvements

- Original Message - From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 3:07 AM Subject: RE: Procrun improvements > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25787] New: - adding <%@ attribute name="xxx" fragment="true" %> won't be declared

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Default Tomcat installation location on Windows

>Dominik: >If you have experienced problems with non 8.3 filename/folder name situation >in windows I would substitute in the Windows system assigned 8.3 name e.g. >C:\PROGRA~1 instead of C:\Program Files I haven't had any problems related to non 8.3 filenames with Tomcat. What I wanted to point o

Re: Default Tomcat installation location on Windows

Dominik: If you have experienced problems with non 8.3 filename/folder name situation in windows I would substitute in the Windows system assigned 8.3 name e.g. C:\PROGRA~1 instead of C:\Program Files -dobranoc- Martin - Original Message - From: "Dominik Drzewiecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Default Tomcat installation location on Windows

Howdy, The default location for Tomcat 5.0 installation on Windows is "c:\program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0". On the other hand, win32 Apache 2.0 installer suggests "c:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache 2.0". I suggest that these directories should be unified for clarity, let's s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24943] - Tomcat 5.0.14 / Windows 2000 Service does not start

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24943] - Tomcat 5.0.14 / Windows 2000 Service does not start

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Errors when connecting Tomcat to Apache

I'm using the mod_jk module to connect Tomcat to Apache but I get the following errors when I start the Tomcat server: mod_jk location: modules\mod_jk.dll Make sure it is installed corectly or set the config location Using Can't find workers.properties at C:\jakarta-tomcat\conf\jk\workers.p

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24943] - Tomcat 5.0.14 / Windows 2000 Service does not start

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug report for Watchdog [2003/12/28]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2003/12/28]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2003/12/28]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

RE: Procrun improvements

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The question is do you need the mentioned features _now_, > if there is > > a new release on the horizon, or this can wait for a week or two? > > It would be good to have a new tag for TC 5 relativelely sh

RE: Procrun improvements

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat > Subject: Procrun improvements > > Hi, > > There are some problems with procrun for the VM setup. Right > now, the only setting which works AFAIK is using "java" and > letting procrun detect the VM using the Windows registry. The procrun

Re: Procrun improvements

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2003 1:42 AM Subject: Procrun improvements > Hi, > > There are some problems with procrun for the VM setup. Right now, the > only setting which wor

Re: Procrun improvements

Mladen Turk wrote: There are some problems with procrun for the VM setup. Right now, the only setting which works AFAIK is using "java" and letting procrun detect the VM using the Windows registry. The procrun is a little bit clumsy to maintain. I'm working on the 2.0 version that will have spitt

Procrun improvements

Hi, There are some problems with procrun for the VM setup. Right now, the only setting which works AFAIK is using "java" and letting procrun detect the VM using the Windows registry. I think the following two items should be supported: - I think it should be possible to specify a path to the JV

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17523] - Servlet can't getSession

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu