Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

All, Patrick Luby wrote: > I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a > java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable - > assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the > JSR-154 code. After all, the java-servletapi-4 repository has, f

[PATCH] Tomcat-4 Gump descriptor and commons-logging

Hi, you are trying to copy both jars (I've just now discovered, that there are two) of commons-logging in your Gump descriptor, unfortunatly simply adding the second jar has brokwn a couple of other builds. Please apply the patch below, it will temporarily disable the -api.jar. After this has b

Re: mod_jk config options - some elaboration, please?

You can check out this: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-3.3-doc/tomcat-ssl-howto.html I'm sure that the definitive list of options can be found in the source. Bojan Quoting Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, could someone tell me the function of the following, please? > > JkExtrac

SSL Client Auth / Broken Pipe after negotiation

Hello, I've been trying to get SSL client auth to work using a simple URL client. The command line looks like the following: java -Djava.protocol.handler.pkgs=com.sun.net.ssl.internal.www.protocol -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=matt.jks -Djavax.net.debug=all URLClient https://akula.geek.ca/ >out

mod_jk config options - some elaboration, please?

Hi, could someone tell me the function of the following, please? JkExtractSSL On JkHTTPSIndicator HTTPS JkSESSIONIndicator SSL_SESSION_ID JkCIPHERIndicator SSL_CIPHER JkCERTSIndicator SSL_CLIENT_CERT Is there, anywhere, a _definitive_ list of all of the options you may use for mod_jk, and their

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > > -jon > I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable - assumpt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: tomcat+jdbc

Mario, This question is probably better sent to the tomcat-user mailing list. You have imported the IEEMBeans.DBABean, but where are you instantiating it? (or jsp:usebean) > at IEEMBeans.DBABean.createStatement(DBABean.java:71) > Look at the source code of DBABean.java, line 71. Something ther

mod_jk2: bug 10789

Costin, Mladen, could you guys have a look into this. The fix that I put into mod_jk 1.2.0 works fine and default pages do get picked up. A symmetric fix for mod_jk 2 did not work for Mark, the original bug reporter, so I reverted it. CVS versions 1.40 and 1.41 of mod_jk2.c are the ones in questi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3774] - Error loading web.xml on root context when specified in server.xml file on Windows

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

tomcat+jdbc

Hi. i have a page jsp with code: under /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/examples/jsps/page1.jsp under /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/IEEMBeans/ exist DBABean.class, HtmlWriterBean.class, FunctionsBean.class, sessionBean.class <%@ page import = "IEEMBeans.DBABean" %> <%// **

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:34:18 -0700 > From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's > > After JSR053 was formed and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic exe

Re: Missed vote

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe this can't be a 'consensus' vote - at least the proposal > for the code organization was a 'majority' vote with multiple > choices. > > This is how the repository was organized before, xml.apache.org > is doing the same for SAX and DOM an

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > After JSR053 was formed and dependencies were added to the Servlet API from > the JSP API, it became clear that this was a bad thing. It was ok to have > the JSP API rely on the Servlet API, but not the other way around. The > reason for this is because many people ch

[PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

After JSR053 was formed and dependencies were added to the Servlet API from the JSP API, it became clear that this was a bad thing. It was ok to have the JSP API rely on the Servlet API, but not the other way around. The reason for this is because many people choose to use the Servlet API without

Re: Missed vote

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 7/17/02 3:50 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As I said, xml.apache.org is packaging 3 APIs from 3 different and > > unrelated sources in a single repo and jar ( DOM, SAX, JAXP ), and > > that was discussed and aproved by

Re: Missed vote

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:30:05 -0700 > From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Missed vote > > on 7/17/02 2:47 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Missed vote

on 7/17/02 3:50 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I said, xml.apache.org is packaging 3 APIs from 3 different and > unrelated sources in a single repo and jar ( DOM, SAX, JAXP ), and > that was discussed and aproved by both xalan and xerces communities. Those 3 api's are co

Re: Missed vote

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > We are also talking about the next version of the Servlet API (5.0) which is > based on the work of JSR 154...not JSR 053. JSR 154 is specific to the > Servlet API and is not working on JSP. So, it no longer makes sense to have > the two together fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c

bojan 2002/07/17 15:43:59 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c Log: Revert the fix for default pages - it seems jk2 does things differently then jk1 (surprise). User confirms the fix does not work. Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +2 -3 jakarta-tomcat-conne

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10907] - Ambiguous class: JspException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Missed vote

on 7/17/02 2:47 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so I'm > -1 on spliting them up unless the JSR expert groups decide > so. As Craig mentioned on the JSR 154 list, this isn't a JSR decision and I wasn't talking about splitting the jar's up...Sun can distribute whatever they w

Re: Missed vote

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > Until the JSP 2.0 spec is changed, it make less sense for us to > > have two separate repos. (It just make more sense to put > > javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagInfo with javax.servlet classes). > > They can be in separate repo's with the same packa

Re: Missed vote

on 7/17/02 1:30 PM, "Kin-Man Chung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sympathetic to Jon's view on separating servlet and JSP API > and repositories. > > One result of the separation would make it likely that package names > for JSP 2.0 API may change. JSP2.0 is now in public review, so it may

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

luehe 2002/07/17 14:13:38 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: Fixed bug in JSP Fragment generation [PATCH by Mark Roth] Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +87 -38 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/G

Help on tomcat-jdk conflict...

Hi there... I'm facing a conflict problem between jakarta-tomcat-4.0 - jdk1.3.1_04 I have set sys variables JAVA_HOME - C:\jdk1.3.1_04 CATALINA_HOME - C:\jakarta-tomcat-4.0 and this is the msg i get when i try ro startup tomcat Ex

RE: Missed vote

I am sympathetic to Jon's view on separating servlet and JSP API and repositories. One result of the separation would make it likely that package names for JSP 2.0 API may change. JSP2.0 is now in public review, so it may be important to raise this issue before the door is closed. Until the JSP

[Patch] new file: webapps/tomcat-docs/config/listener.xml

The (o.a.c.LifecycleListener) can be imbedded in various containers. It is mentioned in the engine.xml, host.xml, context.xml and defaultcontext.xml, and is actually used in the current conf/server.xml, but there is not a page about it. This one is a bit sketchy but at least provides some coverag

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java JspDocumentParser.java Node.java Parser.java

luehe 2002/07/17 13:06:59 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java JspDocumentParser.java Node.java Parser.java Log: Do not declare tag handler pools for SimpleTag handlers. Revision ChangesPath 1.40 +43 -72

[Patch] webapps/examples/WEB-INF/web.xml

This patch provides an obvious display-name and description for the nice new HTMLManager and Admin webapps. Ian Index: webapps/examples/WEB-INF/web.xml === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/web.xm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10912] - org.apache.catalina.INVOKER.process.queue_server is currently unavailable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10912] - org.apache.catalina.INVOKER.process.queue_server is currently unavailable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10912] - org.apache.catalina.INVOKER.process.queue_server is currently unavailable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10901] - Response#setLocale() does not set charset encoding

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Tomcat and JSDK 1.4

Okay, "Tomcat 4 has been extensively tested with JDK 1.3.1, which is recommended." My question is, have any of you gurus out there worked with JSDK 1.4? If so, on what platforms? Have any problems? Sorry to give a 'do my homework for me' question, but I have no time to do all those tests, and I'm

RE: Missed vote

For what is worth, I think Jon is 100% right on this one. And he was cristal clear about the reasons too. Regards, Paulo > -Original Message- > From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:43 AM > To: tomcat-dev > Subject: Re: Missed vote > > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10910] - Setting response encoding of ManagerServlet & HTMLManagerServlet

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10912] New: - org.apache.catalina.INVOKER.process.queue_server is currently unavailable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10910] New: - Setting response encoding of ManagerServlet & HTMLManagerServlet

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10909] New: - Problem calling anonymous classes in servlet destroy() method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

[PATCH]Japanese localization for Tomcat-Admin

Hello, Tomcat 4 commiters, I post Japanese localization patch for Tomcat Administration Tool. (original: jakarta-tomcat-4.1.7-LE-jdk14 binary distribution) This patch was made by Okamoto-san and me. It includes the Japanese resource file and modified .jsp files. in .jsp, we added the page direct

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10907] New: - Ambiguous class: JspException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10711] - [PATCH] relative filenames with ../ do not work for JSP-includes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10899] -

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10899] -

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Duplicate ? [Bug 10899] = 10711

Hi, I think, this is a duplicate for The patch given for that (see bug report) should fix the same problem. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10899 > > > >Summary: >Product: Tomcat 4 >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10903] New: - Unbalanced tags do not generate compile time error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] New: - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10901] New: - Response#setLocale() does not set charset encoding

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10899] New: -

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10896] New: - Parsing ContentType error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10895] New: - access log contains scrambled text when using Coyote JK 2 connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10894] - untar binary with directory checksum error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10894] New: - untar binary with directory checksum error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10891] New: - mod_jk2 addcookie setheader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4690] - sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10886] - Session data accessible across web applications

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10886] - Session data accessible across web applications

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10886] New: - Session data accessible across web applications

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10885] - Fix and improve JTA How-To

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10885] New: - Fix and improve JTA How-To

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

[TC 4.0/4.1] - Recycling session objects is inherently error prone

Since the lifetime of session objects span requests and since session objects are expired asynchronously by the background thread created by the session manager, if one did recycle session objects then isn't it possible for 2 separate requests to access and possibly modify a session object simult