cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF controls.tld tree-control.tld

2001-12-17 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/12/17 20:17:32 Modified:webapps/admin tree-control-test.jsp Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF controls.tld Removed: webapps/admin/WEB-INF tree-control.tld Log: Change the name of the application-specific tag library to "controls" so that we can add some additio

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java

2001-12-17 Thread patrickl
patrickl01/12/17 18:50:30 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java Log: Implement a better fix for the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in main Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +5 -9 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/sta

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java

2001-12-17 Thread patrickl
patrickl01/12/17 18:44:51 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java Log: Print usage statement if there are no arguments Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +8 -4 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup/Tool.java In

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5471] New: - jspc -webapp option is broken due to namespace collisions

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5330] - JNDI ENC context problem.

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

apx

2001-12-17 Thread Mark Wambach
I am trying to set up a project which uses servlets and thought I was doing fine until it came time to access the server via port 8180. All the emails refer to 8080, but it looks to me like the default port for non-secure HTTP communications comes as 8180 in web.xml. Anyway... I have jdk1.3.1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5463] New: - JKMount directory incorrectly generated in mod_jk.conf for name_number directories under Tomcat default webapps.

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java

2001-12-17 Thread remm
remm01/12/17 12:41:00 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves Tag: tomcat_40_branch ErrorReportValve.java Log: - Fix a problem where an exception report thrown from a servlet or a JSP would not get properly displayed. The bug was caused

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java

2001-12-17 Thread remm
remm01/12/17 12:21:12 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves ErrorReportValve.java Log: - Fix a problem where an exception report thrown from a servlet or a JSP would not get properly displayed. The bug was caused because sendError now

Re: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote: > > Keep in mind that with distributed sessions (coming soon to a tomcat > near you), affinity is no longer 'required' in order to function. This > provides the added benefit of fail-over. As I mentioned in a thread about this on TOMCAT-USER, there *are* s

Re: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing - Attributes

2001-12-17 Thread Tom Drake
Oliver: No, there is no single point of failure. The way it works is thus: Each tomcat instance in a cluster (defined by a single multicast address/port): - Shall keep a copy of all sessions that it owns (created). - May be configured to be a session repository (or not). Session repositories

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin SetUpServerAction.java

2001-12-17 Thread patrickl
patrickl01/12/17 09:37:43 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin SetUpServerAction.java Log: Replace tabs with proper number of spaces to conform to coding style standard Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +27 -27 jakarta-t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_en.properties ApplicationResources_es.properties SetUpServerAction.java SetUpServiceAction.java

2001-12-17 Thread patrickl
patrickl01/12/17 09:34:05 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_en.properties ApplicationResources_es.properties SetUpServerAction.java SetUpServiceAction.java Log:

AW: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - LoadBalancing

2001-12-17 Thread Lauer, Oliver
Tom, Will the repository be a single point of failure then ? Oliver > AXA eSolutions GmbH > AXA Konzern AG Germany > Oliver Lauer > Web Architect > Wörthstraße 34 > D-50668 Köln > Germany > Tel.: +49 221 148 31277 > Fax: +49 221 148 43963 > Mobil: +49 179 59 064 59 > e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:25:17 -0600 > From: Kevin Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread costinm
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >couldn't the connector be solely > >responsible for > >this? the connector could add a cookie to the response, then read this > >cookie on subsequent requests, and then you wouldn't have to > >add stuff to > >servlet containers to handle this. or, i co

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread costinm
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Kevin Seguin wrote: > > Tomcat 4.0.x support ajp13 protocol, used in mod_jk > > but still miss a subtil feature (jvmroute) to be > > able to keep the route to the good JVM in > > session mode (SessionAfinity). > > how does the connector set/use jvmroute? i assume there is so

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>how does the connector set/use jvmroute? i assume there is >some sort of >cookie magic going on, but after a brief tour of the code, >it's not obvious >to me how this jvmroute stuff works. the jvmroute is computed when sessionid is created : sessionid = f(entropy) + jvmroute >it seems to me

Transfer-Encoding: chunked

2001-12-17 Thread Will Droste
Hey Guys, My name is Will I've been trying to do Transfer-Encoding: chunked on my request to Tomcat 4.0.1, with no success I've tried using the Apache Commons jar, a HttpClient library that said it had chunked encoding on requests, and my own implementation. I've look through the Catalina source

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread Kevin Seguin
> > >there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's > >the status of > >loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ? > >Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly > >there won't be > >any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ? > > State of the art is that

Fw: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread Tom Drake
- Original Message - From: "Tom Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:47 AM Subject: Re: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing | When my work is done, Session Affinity will not be required in orde

RE: [j-t-c] patch for jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/ jk_a jp_common.c

2001-12-17 Thread Kevin Seguin
> > The patch seems valid and the pmsg was passed for this > purpose in previous release of J-T-C but some folks > (didn't remember who) make modifications in mod_jk > part of code and the update was lost. > > Seems ok, you could commit :) > done. > This patch fix a real problem and should be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4223] - AJP13 connectors InputStream newer returns -1

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2001-12-17 Thread seguin
seguin 01/12/17 07:29:38 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: actually send post data beyond the first ~8K to the servlet container. if a client request contains post data, the first chunk of it is sent to the container directly after the forward request is sent.

RE: org.apache.tomcat.util.net package in tomcat 3.x

2001-12-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>If the trafic becomes too big, we should definitely separate them, but >what is big remain open ( tomcat-users is huge, I just can't read it >without headaches - that's where a split will be most needed ) Exact, we'll have to split at some time just to be able to see if the question is related

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5446] - Can't change webapp class loader (bug #5391 revisited :)

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5446] - Can't change webapp class loader (bug #5391 revisited :)

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5446] - Can't change webapp class loader (bug #5391 revisited :)

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5379] - j-t-c webapps java can not compile

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4139] - mod_webapp build files for Win32

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4042] - webapp component requires Port directive versus Listen directive

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3643] - Enable static-linking within Apache for WebApp module

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4500] - isapi_redirect.dll does not pass Client certificate to tomcat

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5446] - Can't change webapp class loader (bug #5391 revisited :)

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4223] - AJP13 connectors InputStream newer returns -1

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4930] - java.io.StreamCorruptedException: Type code out of range, is 0 with Apache WebApp module

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3509] - Apache 1.3.20 & mod_webapp & Tomcat 4b7 HANGS under Win

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Trouble building mod_webapp.so for Apache 2.0.28

2001-12-17 Thread jean-frederic clere
Try to update your libtool. I use the following: +++ jfclere@vtxclere:~ > libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.3.5 (1.385.2.206 2000/05/27 11:12:27) +++ Cavan Morris wrote: > > I am unable to build mod_webapp.so for apache 2.0.28 on my redhat 7.2 > system. > > Here's what I've been doing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5364] - Can't re-deploy a web application with the manager

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4334] - ServerName in httpd.conf vs. defaultHost in server.xml Error: addChild: Child name 'hostname.myserver.com' is not unique

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4334] - ServerName in httpd.conf vs. defaultHost in server.xml Error: addChild: Child name 'hostname.myserver.com' is not unique

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5438] - mod_webapp doesn't work consistently

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5330] - JNDI ENC context problem.

2001-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Why Tomcat 3.3 runs much faster than 3.2.3?

2001-12-17 Thread Hugh J. L.
As I tested, Tomcat 3.3 runs much faster than 3.2.3 (for both JSP and Servlet requests). What changes are the main factors of this performance improvement? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your uniqu

RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing

2001-12-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ? What's >the status of >loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ? >Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly >there won't be >any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ? State of the art is that today only mod_jk

RE: [j-t-c] patch for jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_a jp_common.c

2001-12-17 Thread GOMEZ Henri
The patch seems valid and the pmsg was passed for this purpose in previous release of J-T-C but some folks (didn't remember who) make modifications in mod_jk part of code and the update was lost. Seems ok, you could commit :) This patch fix a real problem and should be also propagated to Tomcat