[TC4] build.properties.sample minor patch

Minor patch, I think it is just a typo error Punky __ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ build.properties.sample.patch

Re: [T4] Build Frustration

> > The current build system has gotten to be a mess (again) in the last few > months. > Jon, I worked very hard every few days in this month to make my TC4 built successfully May be I was the one who found more frustrated than you. Although I see that there are active changes to the build sy

Re: New resource: Bugs every servlet programmer should know about

Good suggestion, Craig. I've updated the list to include this. I also incorporated all the other comments from the people who wrote me. Glad to see the ajp13 issue is fixed in 3.2.3! -jh- "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Jason, > > One "family" of bugs you might want to include pertains to

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk12Support.java

rubys 01/09/18 18:28:34 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk12Support.java Log: Fix what appears to be a minor oversight... Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jdk12Support.java Index: J

[PATCH] TC 3.3: DependClassLoader

This version should be more efficient and cleaner too. Will do the old code with comments too. Bojan --- /home/groups/devel/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/depend/DependClassLoader.java Mon Sep 17 11:51:16 2001 +++ +jakarta-tomcat-changed/src/share/org/apache/tomca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3709] New: - Tyrex license is not being followed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3708] New: - ldap.jar has a questionable license

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java Jdk12Support.java

costin 01/09/18 16:24:46 Modified:.build.xml src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat Jdk11Compat.java J

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Bojan Smojver

Mike Anderson wrote: > > +1 > > Keep up the good work Bojan! > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/17/01 05:43AM >>> > I would like to propose Bojan Smojver as a committer. > He has supplied a number of patches as well as done > useful testing. I think he would make good addition > to the Jakarta team.

Re: [PATCH]: TC 3.3: DependClassLoader

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Bojan, > > First, you're a commiter now, feel free to fix anything you see > broken :-) Didn't know it was official. Thanks! > Regarding this particular fix - it will not have a big performance > impact ( except for loading .class files, which happen once ). > H

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3699] - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming NamingContext.java

remm01/09/18 15:30:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming NamingContext.java Log: - Fix bug 3699 - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext. Patch submitted by ygary2 at yahoo.com (sorry I couldn't find your name anywhere). Revision Change

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming NamingContext.java

remm01/09/18 15:28:57 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming Tag: tomcat_40_branch NamingContext.java Log: - Fix bug 3699 - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext. Patch submitted by ygary2 at yahoo.com (sorry I couldn't f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3695] - Do not add ldap.jar to class path on JDK 1.3 or later

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3707] New: - Custom action attribute of type Object does not accept literal string value

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: build problem

Hi Anthony, AFAIK ( and I just checked the java lang spec ), a class ( CharArrayWriter) can override a method ( write ) and have fewer "throws" declarations. It can't have _more_ exceptions. CharArrayWriter.write() doesn't have any throw() declaration, so the code seems correct. We can add a ca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3665] - Request Dispatching - Parameters are not properly set

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Start up script

Hello again, > To make this kind of RC script available on also on Solaris > or other UNIX-like systems, I wrote some simple one. > I tested it with Tomcat 3.2.3 on Linux, and works well. The trouble on RedHat 7.0 is reported to me. "/etc/rc" on RedHat Linux sees if /var/lock/subsys/tomcat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3704] New: - forward errors not reported

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Compile errors

> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:25:33 -0700 > > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Compile errors > > > > I'm trying to build off the tomcat-4.0 branch and it isn't work

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3699] New: - A recursive function call in org.apache.naming.NamingContext

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3667] - Only one ValidationMessage processed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3698] New: - ServletContext.getRealPath() no longer adds trailing slash to result.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Start up script

Hello, Congratulations for the final release of Tomcat3.3 and 4. Both of them are the products by the enthusiastic efforts by Costin, Craig and all the cool guys on this list. I believe Tomcat will be (or already is) the de facto standard of Servlet/JSP server implementation. By the way, I rem

Re: Compile errors

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Today, if you download (say) the 3.2 source tree and build it, in an > environment that doesn't have JSSE installed, the build script will > silently create a incomplete distribution for you, because it will > silently exclude building SSLServerSo

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release

> Javadocs). I see that I forgot to put up the binary distributions of > jakarta-servletapi-4; will do that in a sec. That's what I meant - thanks Kevin Jones Developmentor www.develop.com > -Original Message- > From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig > R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3649] - webapps/example/cal doesn't encode HTML

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ldap.jar license

I love your flaming reaction Craig. You are trying to justify two wrongs making a right or something. on 9/18/01 9:09 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Coming from someone who bragged (at his ApacheCon London session on Turbine) > about not caring about violating license agr

build problem

One of the local changes I had to make to Tomcat in order to build with gcj is in JspReader.java... char[] getChars(Mark start, Mark stop) throws ParseException { Mark oldstart = mark(); reset(start); CharArrayWriter caw = new CharArrayWriter(); while (!stop.eq

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3695] New: - Do not add ldap.jar to class path on JDK 1.3 or later

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ldap.jar license

on 9/18/01 2:31 AM, "Brian Behlendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: >> There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a >> position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a >> result of use of this .jar file.

Re: Ldap.jar license

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:51:06 -0700 > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: JCP Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL P

Re: SSL Attributes

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > >> +1 , and a comment on Readme.txt as is a spec compliance issue > >> > >> Until we find a way to cache Client Certificate Chain.. > > > >Or we add 2 more messages in ajp13/14 - to get the chain when the user > >request it. > > > >In fact, even the client certificate shoul

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Kevin Jones wrote: > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:36:55 +0100 > From: Kevin Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release > > Excellent :-) > > But where's the servlet API jar? > T

Re: Another build problem...

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:51:27 -0700 > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Another build problem... > > on 9/17/01 9:40 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Compile errors

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:25:33 -0700 > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Compile errors > > I'm trying to build off the tomcat-4.0 branch and it isn't working... > > It s

RE: SSL Attributes

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > That something I've got in mind for ajp14, written on that > many times allready, with headers and miscs informations > to be asked by tomcat to web-server at getAttributes time > for example : +1 ( but not before 3.3 is final ! ) Costin > > Currentl

Re: Ldap.jar license

Jon Stevens wrote: > -1 > > I do not agree to this license for inclusion of ldap.jar in Tomcat 4.0 > final. > > 124 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jon wheel 123717 Sep 17 19:36 ldap.jar > > This is a similar license to the old Servlet API 2.0 license and I never > agreed to that one for inclusion in J

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3617] - "null" in JasperException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3617] - "null" in JasperException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3617] - "null" in JasperException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: SSL Attributes

>> +1 , and a comment on Readme.txt as is a spec compliance issue >> >> Until we find a way to cache Client Certificate Chain.. > >Or we add 2 more messages in ajp13/14 - to get the chain when the user >request it. > >In fact, even the client certificate should be retrieved only >on demand, >I a

Building nsapi_redirector.so for iPlanet on Solaris 8

I am having a real problem trying to get some comprehensive instructions on how to do this. I am running iPlanet 4.1 SP7 in Solaris 8 connecting to a Tomcat 3.2.3 server running on |Red Hat Linux 7, with the following set up: SunOS devweb1 5.8 Generic_108528-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cE

Re: [Bug 3600] New: - /etc/rc.d scripts of the rpm

Hi, We're having a discussion on the tomcat (http://jakarta.apache.org/) developper mailing list on the best location of some files. Could you please enlighten us ? * should configuration for an /etc/rc script better be in /etc or /etc/sysconfig (like RedHat and Mandrake do for their own scripts

Re: [T4] Build Frustration

> [ ] A: Leave the build system as is > [ ] B: Make as many libraries as possible optional > [ ] C: Provide both, as discussed above; I'll volunteer to implement it (but > of course, others can help) I vote for B, and am willing to help with the coding/testing. I would suggest that B be ammende

RE: SSL Attributes

On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes). > > Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it > > follows the spec's. > > For the moment I will only return the first certificate. > > Returning the complete > > chain is qu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release

Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >It's official! The Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2 specifications are now final, > At the site for the specs http://www.jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr053/ It looks like the actions on the forms are pointing to an internal LAN name, ( "webwork.eng" ? ) so t

Re: [PATCH]: TC 3.3: DependClassLoader

Hi Bojan, First, you're a commiter now, feel free to fix anything you see broken :-) Regarding this particular fix - it will not have a big performance impact ( except for loading .class files, which happen once ). However I would rather keep the old code and add comments - reading a stream byt

Re: SSL Attributes

"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote: > > > I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes). > > Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it > > follows the spec's. > > For the moment I will only return the first certificate. > > Returning the complete > > chain is quite a lot of data a

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java

jfclere 01/09/18 05:29:30 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java Log: Arrange "javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate" so that it follows the spec's Note that it is only the first certificate of the chain. Revision ChangesPath 1.27 +22 -1

RE: SSL Attributes

> I have found it the 2.2 Spec's (5.7 SSL Attributes). > Now I have started to fix Ajp13 in jakarta-tomcat so that it > follows the spec's. > For the moment I will only return the first certificate. > Returning the complete > chain is quite a lot of data and it is probably useless for > applica

[PATCH]: TC 3.3: DependClassLoader

After digging some more into the code of it, I've realized that the readFully() method is really hard to understand. So, unless there are some substantial performance gains in the existing approach, maybe we should go with something a bit simpler. And just as a side note, you've probably noticed

Re: SSL Attributes

"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote: > > Hi, > > I have patched mod_jk for TC4.0 so that the SSL Attributes follow the spec's > (SRV.4.7). > I have not found anything in the 2.2 spec's about it. > > I have noted that the "javax.servlet.cert.X509Certificate" of TC3.3 is a String > not an array of java.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3644] - Errors reloading resources from jars: possible JDK bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ldap.jar license

On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > There is no way in hell that I'm going agree to put the ASF (or myself) in a > position to take responsibility for any legal claims that come up as a > result of use of this .jar file. Carefully read supplemental section #2 (v). Commenting here without su

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Tomcat 4.0 Final Release

Excellent :-) But where's the servlet API jar? Kevin Jones Developmentor www.develop.com > -Original Message- > From: craigmcc@localhost [mailto:craigmcc@localhost]On Behalf Of Craig > R. McClanahan > Sent: 18 September 2001 04:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL