cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java

2001-02-02 Thread remm
remm01/02/02 23:48:33 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpResponseBase.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http HttpResponseImpl.java catalina/src/share/org/apac

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm TomcatAdmin.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 23:48:28 Modified:src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm TomcatAdmin.java Log: Fix setLog in TomcatAdmin taglib. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +4 -3 jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm/TomcatAdmin.java Index: TomcatAdmin.java =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config LogSetter.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 23:34:41 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Context.java src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config LogSetter.java Log: Ops, made a mistake - the context modules can't be initialized before the context is added - since there is no context man

[PATCH]: Bugrat report 723 ( unescaping/unencoding URLs ) was 'Re: 3.2.2 Release?'

2001-02-02 Thread David Weinrich
Thanks to everyone, that cleared things up quite a bit. Here is the patch for bugrat report 723 ( tomcat 3.2.x not unescaping escaped urls ). The patch is extremely short, and implemented a tiny bit different from the one I sent in for 3.2.x a while ago, the unencoding is done before the path is

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Context.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 23:08:01 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Context.java Log: Few changes in Context to make sure the state and rules defined in ContextManager are respected. ( i.e. no add/initContext before all modules are initialized, etc ). Note that per-Context

Re: Bugzilla categories

2001-02-02 Thread Tim Tye
Sounds good to me. Tim - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:58 PM Subject: Bugzilla categories > Hi, > > What about another category - "Encoding" for all encoding-related bugs ? > ( that would include all "special chars

Bugzilla categories

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
Hi, What about another category - "Encoding" for all encoding-related bugs ? ( that would include all "special chars", charsets, etc). It's a big issue and I want to have all the related bugs grouped togheter. ( I'll work on them - but it's not easy and will take few weeks to sort it out ) --

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core BaseInterceptor.java Context.java ContextManager.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:43:20 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core BaseInterceptor.java Context.java ContextManager.java Log: Few changes needed to finish the LogSetter. - ContextManager is no longer a "Log" manager - LogSetter is just setting the Log

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config LogSetter.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:36:25 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config LogSetter.java Log: Finishing the LogSetter. - The name of the log will be a full path ( org/apache/tomcat, etc ) instead of tc_log - add a log message ( until we're sure everything works as we

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/log Log.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:29:50 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/log Log.java Log: Small change in Log, to allow future improvements ( if needed ) without chaging the core. Log has the methods used by tomcat.core and modules - QueueLogger and DefaultLogger are simple imp

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config PathSetter.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:22:19 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config PathSetter.java Log: Finishing the LogSetter - the module that deals with Log is the LogSetter, there is no need for the hack in DefaultCMSetter/PathSetter. ( the problem was that logs were set in a

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoDeploy.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:19:46 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoDeploy.java Log: Started work on 427 - if a war file is specified in server.xml in a different location than webapps, we should expand it. ( I'm not sure this is the right thing - IMHO the right

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config RelativePathFix.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 21:16:07 Removed: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config RelativePathFix.java Log: Removing old code ( it was an earlier attempt for what is now PathSetter ) - To unsubs

Re: bugzilla

2001-02-02 Thread Warner Onstine
Thanks for the info! -warner - Original Message - From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 8:15 PM Subject: Re: bugzilla > Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is it possible to set the from or the to address on the

Re: bugzilla

2001-02-02 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to set the from or the to address on the bugs to reflect > where they are actually coming from? ie - tomcat, ant, etc.? Unfortunately > my email client cannot filter on the reply-to or any of those other w > addresses (and I'm sure othe

RE: [BUG 235] ajp13 and RequestDispatcher.forward() gotcha !

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
You could easily reproduce the bugs playing with : This one works http://yourhost:8080/examples/servlet/servletToJsp with mod_jk this one fail (reload X times) http://yourhost/examples/servlet/servletToJsp On ne peut résoudre les problèmes les plus graves avec le même esprit qui les a crées.

RE: [BUG 235] ajp13 and RequestDispatcher.forward() gotcha !

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
TC 3.2.1 seems fixed. I just take a look at code and saw that the finished = true; is present in org.apache.tomcat.service.connector.Ajp13ConnectorResponse !-) public void finish() throws IOException { if (!finished) { super.finish(); finished = true;

[Bug 431] New - Class org.apache.struts.util.MessageResources is declared as Serializable which is not true BugRat Report#742

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=431 *** shadow/431 Fri Feb 2 18:28:46 2001 --- shadow/431.tmp.19482Fri Feb 2 18:28:46 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,21 + ++ + | Class org.apache.st

Re: [BUG 235] ajp13 and RequestDispatcher.forward() gotcha !

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > It's late but I found it. > > After some ethereal dumps I noticed that the finish method in > org.apache.tomcat.modules.server.Ajp13Interceptor is called 2 times > when using forward and so we sent 2 time the END_OF_RESPONSE to > the Apache Web Server. > > So Apache (dependin

[BUG 235] ajp13 and RequestDispatcher.forward() gotcha !

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
It's late but I found it. After some ethereal dumps I noticed that the finish method in org.apache.tomcat.modules.server.Ajp13Interceptor is called 2 times when using forward and so we sent 2 time the END_OF_RESPONSE to the Apache Web Server. So Apache (depending on reqs rate and load) will ge

Re: Tomcat 4 SecurityManager and Jasper ClassLoader changes

2001-02-02 Thread Glenn Nielsen
In answer, here is a copy of the original message I posted. Glenn Original Message Subject: Tomcat 4 Jasper ClassLoading changes to support SecurityManager Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:46:20 -0600 From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTE

bugzilla

2001-02-02 Thread Warner Onstine
Is it possible to set the from or the to address on the bugs to reflect where they are actually coming from? ie - tomcat, ant, etc.? Unfortunately my email client cannot filter on the reply-to or any of those other w addresses (and I'm sure others are the same way, hope, hope ;-). -warner -

[Bug 337] Changed - Tomcat JDBCRealm authentication BugRat Report#606

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=337 *** shadow/337 Fri Feb 2 16:29:02 2001 --- shadow/337.tmp.18052Fri Feb 2 17:09:06 2001 *** *** 2,8 | Tomcat JDBCRealm authentication BugRat Report#606 | +

[Bug 337] New - Tomcat JDBCRealm authentication BugRat Report#606

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=337 *** shadow/337 Fri Feb 2 16:29:02 2001 --- shadow/337.tmp.17850Fri Feb 2 16:29:02 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,58 + ++ + | Tomcat JDBCRealm au

RE: BugZilla Tomcat 3 components

2001-02-02 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
This was prior to find that the Config component, perhaps fits this problem ? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: sábado 3 de febrero de 2001 1:15 > Para: 'tomcat-dev' > Asunto: Re: BugZilla Tomcat 3 component

Re: BugZilla Tomcat 3 components

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> Hola a todos: > > I'm about to add a new component for bugs related to JDBCRealm , and i > want to gather opinions about the correct name of the bugzilla-component > that makes sense to JDBCRealm, I'm thinking in "Realms" or > "Interceptors" or "Modules" or something alike .. What about "Auth"

BugZilla Tomcat 3 components

2001-02-02 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Hola a todos: I'm about to add a new component for bugs related to JDBCRealm , and i want to gather opinions about the correct name of the bugzilla-component that makes sense to JDBCRealm, I'm thinking in "Realms" or "Interceptors" or "Modules" or something alike .. FYI. Actual Tomcat 3 Componen

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan

2001-02-02 Thread Arieh Markel
<- Please return this portion with your vote -> Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan Ballot: [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan [ ] -1I am against this plan b

Re: Tomcat 4 SecurityManager and Jasper ClassLoader changes

2001-02-02 Thread Mel Martinez
--- Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have completed the changes necessary to implement > the Java SecurityManager > in Tomcat 4. I have also completed switching Jasper > over to using the > URLClassLoader. Glenn, Could you describe (briefly) the nature of the change in terms of the

[Bug 212] New - Apache + Tomcat bad link handling BugRat Report#325

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212 *** shadow/212 Fri Feb 2 13:51:57 2001 --- shadow/212.tmp.14752Fri Feb 2 13:51:57 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,25 + ++ + | Apache + Tomcat bad

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoWebApp.java

2001-02-02 Thread keith
keith 01/02/02 14:38:34 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config AutoWebApp.java Log: Be safe. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/config/AutoWebApp.java Index: AutoWebApp.java

[Bug 234] New - Can't set multiple cookies in servlet response headers through Ajp13 BugRat Report#371

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234 *** shadow/234 Fri Feb 2 13:54:47 2001 --- shadow/234.tmp.14815Fri Feb 2 13:54:47 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,24 + ++ + | Can't set multiple

[Bug 235] New - Apache, mod_jk + APJ13 problems with RequestDispatcher.forward() BugRat Report#373

2001-02-02 Thread bugzilla
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235 *** shadow/235 Fri Feb 2 13:54:02 2001 --- shadow/235.tmp.14788Fri Feb 2 13:54:03 2001 *** *** 0 --- 1,19 + ++ + | Apache, mod_jk + AP

3.2/3.x nightly builds

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
Will be available starting tonight. Because I don't want to load daedalus and it's much easier for me, I'll make them available from: http://nagoya.apache.org/~costin/ws32/ ( 3.x builds are in: http://nagoya.apache.org/~costin/ws/ ) Few notes: - the build is done with JDK1.2( with no ex

RE: do filters work ...

2001-02-02 Thread Kevin Jones
I have filters working fine on TC 4.0b1 Is demo the name of your web application? If so your web.xml file should look like this prePost /* helloWorld /hello.jsp Even if demo is asubdirectory I would try the first filter mapping here (i.e. filter

RE: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
You are correct, tomcat_32 is the appropriate tag. tomcat_32 is a branch tag so if you use cvs to check out jakarta-tomcat like cvs co -r tomcat_32 jakarta-tomcat then you'll get the latest version of all files on this branch. This is referred to as the "tip" of the branch. The labels like to

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Milstein
tomcat_32 is the right place -- it is a branch which is up to date for all fixes which have been made against 3.2 (including 3.2.1). The other various 3.2 looking things in cvs (e.g. 321_final) are tags but not branches. I'm working on urlencoding stuff right now, so I await your patch with bate

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
David Weinrich wrote: > On a somewhat unrelated note... > I noticed a bugrat report this morning on an urlencoding that I had > submitted a patch for a little while back ( which was flawed/incomplete ). > In the process of redoing the patch and grabbing the source from cvs I came > up against t

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread David Weinrich
On a somewhat unrelated note... I noticed a bugrat report this morning on an urlencoding that I had submitted a patch for a little while back ( which was flawed/incomplete ). In the process of redoing the patch and grabbing the source from cvs I came up against this issue: what the heck tag is a

Re: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> WEB-INF/lib. In the 2.3 model, Y will override X. In the standard delegation > model (i.e. Tomcat 3.2) you'd get the classes from X no matter what you did. If you add a library to the CLASSPATH before starting tomcat 3.x - it'll be used and no webapplication can override or change it. But t

RE: Posting 3.3 native binaries snapshot

2001-02-02 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Sure, just fetch cvs head before you build to pick up all the fixes. Send them to me or let me know where I can get them. Keith -Original Message- From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 2:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Posting 3.3 nativ

RE: mod_jk.so on Solaris

2001-02-02 Thread James Courtney
Here's a simple Solaris makefile that I've used to build both an SSL and non-SSL enabled version of mod_jk. I'm not much of an expert on building C apps but this seems to do the trick. If it doesn't work for you then my disclaimer is that I probably have little or no idea what to try next:( Good

RE: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> The Java2 class loading model is for a loader to "delegate first" to it's > parent loader. Only if the parent loader (that also delegates first to it's > parent) can't find the class will the original loader try to load it. > The code in the main branch is doing exactly that - the class loade

Re: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Marc Saegesser wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >* Java asked the webapp class loader to find the > > controller servlet class > >* The webapp class loader did not find the class > > so it delegated to the shared class loader > >

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Mike Anderson
I don't have commit access so can't help there, but I would like to get the 3.2 versions of the NetWare binaries updated in the builds area (builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/) If we do get nightly builds or do a milestone, or whatever, who should the lucky :-) recipient be? Mike Anderson Se

RE: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
One thing I don't see listed here, and is the biggest reason I don't think I have the time to manage the release, is determining what bugs still exist in the tomcat_32 branch and which of those, if any, should be fixed before releasing 3.2.2. This was an issue that Jon raised regarding the 3.3 re

Re: Posting 3.3 native binaries snapshot

2001-02-02 Thread Mike Anderson
Keith, Could I send you 3.3 binaries for NetWare to put out there as well? Mike Anderson Senior Software Engineer Platform Services Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net services software www.novell.com >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/01 10:56AM >>> With all the changes

Re: HTTPS Redirect/encodeURL problems (Bugzilla #269)

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> Within Tomcat Head / 3.3 there are a host of problems with https pages and Are those fixed in 3.2.x ? We can just use the same fix. > new URL(new URL(requrl), location) So the problem is to combine requrl and location and get the encoded redirect url. Why not just droping new URL(...) and u

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm in the same boat right now. I'd love to a 3.2.2 released but I'm way > > too busy right now to manage a release. > > What about a "milestone" ? It doesn't have all the requirements of a > release. I can add a nightly build of 3.2.x to my scripts too ? ( it'll >

RE: Posting 3.3 native binaries snapshot

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Don't forget that ftp://ftp.falsehope.com/home/gomez/tomcat/ host RPM for TC 3.2.x and 3.3 On ne peut résoudre les problèmes les plus graves avec le même esprit qui les a crées. -- Albert Einstein >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, Feb

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Dan Milstein wrote: > Can someone who has functioned as a release manager for a dot release give > me a quick overview of what's involved? I may be able to find the time, but > I'm not totally clear on the scope of what needs to happen. > What's involved is essentially: * Propose the release pl

RE: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >* Java asked the webapp class loader to find the > controller servlet class >* The webapp class loader did not find the class > so it delegated to the shared class loader >* The shared class loader (which reads

Re: Posting 3.3 native binaries snapshot

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> With all the changes to mod_jk, I'd like to post these binaries > to the jakarta site: > > builds/jakarta-tomcat/native-3.3/linux/i386/mod_jk.so and > ... /win32/i386/mod_jk.dll > > Any objections? These connectors won't be build nightly, but > they will allow peop

do filters work ...

2001-02-02 Thread Grobe, Gary
I'm sending this to the dev group since I'm dealing w/ tomcat4.0 (catalina) issues and not sure how far along filters are. I can't seem to get my filters to work so I have a basic HelloWorld that I'm using. The output of the jsp is what my problem is. Everything seems to come up fine (running in

Re: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Milstein
Can someone who has functioned as a release manager for a dot release give me a quick overview of what's involved? I may be able to find the time, but I'm not totally clear on the scope of what needs to happen. I don't think Milestone releases would make sense -- from what it says on http://jaka

HTTPS Redirect/encodeURL problems (Bugzilla #269)

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Milstein
Within Tomcat Head / 3.3 there are a host of problems with https pages and various url related methods (redirect, encodeURL, etc.) As Andreas Stubenrauch notes in the above bug report, this is a very serious, show stopper problem. What's more, he has found the source of the problem. In org.ap

mod_jk static build

2001-02-02 Thread Avery Buffington
Just wondering if there would be any drawbacks to installin mod_jk as a static module instead of a DSO? I'd like to use it as a static module, but I thought that maybe there was a reason that a makefile was not included to build it in this manner. Before I start making my own Makefile for a sta

RE: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> I'm in the same boat right now. I'd love to a 3.2.2 released but I'm way > too busy right now to manage a release. What about a "milestone" ? It doesn't have all the requirements of a release. I can add a nightly build of 3.2.x to my scripts too ? ( it'll not be a "blessed" release, but people

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_service.h jk_util.c

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I'm working on mod_jk for Apache 2.0 and I'll add the necessary You could find attached a pre-tested mod_jk.c for Apache 2.0 Regards mod_jk.c - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL

Re: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Arthur Ash wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I'm having a general issue with the app-specific classpath (WEB-INF/classes > and WEB-INF/lib/*.jar). > > Here is the scenario as I understand it: > I have an MVC servlet/bean framework that is installed in the primordial > classpath. It contains a single dispat

Posting 3.3 native binaries snapshot

2001-02-02 Thread Keith Wannamaker
With all the changes to mod_jk, I'd like to post these binaries to the jakarta site: builds/jakarta-tomcat/native-3.3/linux/i386/mod_jk.so and ... /win32/i386/mod_jk.dll Any objections? These connectors won't be build nightly, but they will allow people to use the ch

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_service.h jk_util.c

2001-02-02 Thread keith
keith 01/02/02 09:29:09 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3 mod_jk.c src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_service.h jk_util.c Log: Unread body bits need to be discarded or Apache will consider them a new request. (cf jserv_ajpv12

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java

2001-02-02 Thread keith
keith 01/02/02 08:41:53 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/modules/server Ajp13.java Log: It may take multiple read() calls to read an entire packet, especially w.r.t. uploaded files. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +12 -9 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/to

RE: Problems with mod_jk.so, RH7.0, binary/compiled

2001-02-02 Thread Wise, Bowden (CRD)
Well, I didnt even recompile apache, I just took the binaries. It seems that if binaries are provided at www.apache.org they should all work together. Does this mean the binary distribution of apache is standard and not EAPI but the binaries for mod_jk and mod_jserv are EAPI? -Original Me

RE: 3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
I'm in the same boat right now. I'd love to a 3.2.2 released but I'm way too busy right now to manage a release. > -Original Message- > From: danmil [mailto:danmil]On Behalf Of Dan Milstein > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 3.2.2 Release? > > >

3.2.2 Release?

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Milstein
There was some discussion about producing a 3.2.2 release at some point soonish. Where is that now? People have contributed some excellent fixes in the connector area, and I would love to see those available to the general public. I'm not in a position to function as the Release Manager, but I

Cutoff for Tomcat 3.3 Vote

2001-02-02 Thread Larry Isaacs
Hi All, I plan to use (as suggested by Sam Ruby) Monday 8:00 AM EST as the deadline for the Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan vote. That should be enough time for any remaining interested parties to cast a vote. I'll post the final results Monday morning. Cheers, Larry __ Larry Isaacs

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_sockbuf.c

2001-02-02 Thread danmil
danmil 01/02/02 08:59:07 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/common jk_sockbuf.c Log: Fixed bug which was sending mod_jk into infinite loop if the tomcat connector closed its ajp connection to mod_jk before sending the header. Bugzilla Report #510. Contributed by Brian Vetter ([EM

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/jk jk_sockbuf.c

2001-02-02 Thread danmil
danmil 01/02/02 08:55:36 Modified:src/native/jk Tag: tomcat_32 jk_sockbuf.c Log: Fixed bug which was sending mod_jk into infinite loop if the tomcat connector closed its ajp connection to mod_jk before sending the header. Bugzilla Report #510. Contributed by Brian Vetter

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan

2001-02-02 Thread Marc Saegesser
> Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan Ballot: > > [ ] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help > [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help > [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan > [ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my > reason is: I would

RE: [PATCH] for NetWare

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
You can use : cat patch | tr -d '\015' > patch.nodos will remove the dreaded CR On ne peut résoudre les problèmes les plus graves avec le même esprit qui les a crées. -- Albert Einstein >-Original Message- >From: Dan Milstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 02,

RE: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread cmanolache
> I have another question, which has been nagging me for > a while: Why does the class loader for a web-app "see" > the classes in the lib folder of the servlet engine > (or the classpath of the java engine). The problem will be resolved in the main tree ( most of the code is there, I think Nacho

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm AntTag.java

2001-02-02 Thread costin
costin 01/02/02 08:07:53 Modified:src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm AntTag.java Log: JDK1.1, again. Thanks to nightly :-) Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/admin/WEB-INF/classes/tadm/AntTag.java Index: AntTag.java =

Re: [PATCH] for NetWare

2001-02-02 Thread Dan Milstein
Mike, I just tried to apply your fixes, and I'm totally failing -- the local diff command isn't recognizing the files as being at all similar (despite the fact that they look similar on visual inspection). I have a *very* strong suspicion that this has to do with line-ending characters. It look

RE: Problems with mod_jk.so, RH7.0, binary/compiled

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
It seems that Jyve didn't update the Q/A allready. You could see here the text: What's are the message about EAPI or garbled modules ? The message 'mod_jk.so (or mod_jserv.so) is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO ?' arrive when you're trying to install a mod_jk.so DSO module th

RE: Problems with mod_jk.so, RH7.0, binary/compiled

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Added to FAQOMATIC, finalement :-) http://jakarta.apache.org/jyve-faq/Turbine/screen/DisplayQuestionAnswer/acti on/SetAll/project_id/2/faq_id/12/topic_id/42/question_id/762 All the RPMs present on jakarta.apache.org are compiled under Linux Redhat 6.2 and the Apache is so a apache with EAPI (sin

BugRat Report #723 - Escaped URL's are not recognized by Tomcat

2001-02-02 Thread BugRat Mail System
Report #723 Details Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical Confidence: public Environment: Release: 3.2 JVM Release: Java 2 SDK 1.3 Operating System: NT 4 OS Release: service pack 5 Platform:

Improving build.sh of jakarta-servletapi-4

2001-02-02 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I have patched the jakarta-servletapi-4/build.sh, so that it is more closed to the one of jakarta-tomcat-4.0. (at least working in the same environment). Find enclosed the patch, check it and committed it. Cheers Jean-frederic Index: build.sh ===

[REPOST] Using Xerces in my Application

2001-02-02 Thread Kevin Jones
I posted this about a week ago with no luck. Anybody care to comment? I'm trying to use Xerces in my web application. To do this I put the jar file into WEB-INF/lib. However whenever I try and parse any XML I get a 'sealing' exception. I've just read the recent thread on this and it implies that

RE: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread Gudmundur Hafsteinsson
I hope you don't mind me answering your e-mail to the list, I think this deserves some discussion. This is exactly what we've been doing, but it requires fiddling with the libs of the servlet engine, something I don't want to do! I want to be able to separate the libs of the servlet engine

RE: Servlet ClassLoader

2001-02-02 Thread Gudmundur Hafsteinsson
> Am I just screwed or is there some cool trick that I am > missing? As far as I know, this is not possible. I have another question, which has been nagging me for a while: Why does the class loader for a web-app "see" the classes in the lib folder of the servlet engine (or the classpat

RE: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Take a look at any RedHat ( or any similar, RPM-based linux system): >/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/my-package >/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/my-package Just to complement, the RPM (not only Redhat) way : Sources (+ patches) are in : /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ ie: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/jakarta-tomcat-src.t

mod_jk.so on Solaris

2001-02-02 Thread Pilho Kim
Hi, How can I make mod_jk.so (or mod_jserv.so) on Solaris 7 ? Thanks in advance, Kim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]