RE: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled

Oops, apologies. Meant that for Nick only =) - r > -Original Message- > From: Rob S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 30, 2000 8:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled > > > What's needed? > > - r > > > -Original Message- > > From

RE: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled

What's needed? - r > -Original Message- > From: Nick Bauman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: October 30, 2000 8:48 PM > To: tomcat-dev > Subject: [BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled > > > I've disabled searches on Jakarta BugRat. You will just have to browse > the bugs until I untangle

[BUG TRACKING] Searches disabled

I've disabled searches on Jakarta BugRat. You will just have to browse the bugs until I untangle to code that does the searches. Suffice it to say I can't imagine a more resource-intensive series of queries than the ones that are used for bug and report searching in BugRat. Volunteers to help? -N

RE: jboss on tomcat update

Hi all, I've found it VERY interesting to read and learn about licensing in the past several days. In my everlasting naivety, I considered this peripheral to what's really going on - getting the open-source job done. Now I'm all the wiser, and at someone else's expense ;) Anyways, I would like

Re: jboss on tomcat update

> I have heard that if all the developers / contributors agree it is > possible to get JBoss to release under both APL and GPL, or vice versa. > > Why can't this be explored? > > -- > Nicolaus Bauman > Software Engineer > Simplexity Systems This has been explored by the members@ASF during the

Re: jboss on tomcat update

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > 2b) If there is a problem with this, is there any way to configure and > > start the two products in the same VM? > > Not if they make calls to each other. You'll need to get the license of one > or the other changed to a dual license---the disjunct

Re: jboss on tomcat update

For what it's worth... -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:03:39 -0500 From: Free Software Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Java, GPL, & APL Aaron Mulder wrote: > Okay, I've heard too many opinions on th

BugRat Report #322 has been filed.

Bug report #322 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #322 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: webbug State: received Priority: high Severity: seri

Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

> on 10/29/2000 7:57 PM, "Nick Bauman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Right: we aren't talking about fine wine, rare stamps or gold boullion > > here. The code has to move and be moveable to live, to be of value. > Exactly. Code is not important. People are. You may think a large company can

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

craigmcc00/10/30 13:43:53 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: Scan all TLDs underneath the META-INF directory in a JAR file, per the requirements of JSP 1.2 PFD. Revision ChangesPath 1.30 +22 -11

Strange behavior with context mapping and

I am observing the following behavior which I do not understand (Tomcat 3.1 and 3.2b6) The setup: The appdev Hello sample servlet to which the method init (ServletConfig config) has been added. It just prints a line of text. To the servlet's web.xml the 1 element has been added To the server.

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/t hreads Reaper.java

Hi Nick, I'm not aware of a bug being filed for this one. I will be trying to port appropriate Tomcat 3.2 patch's I have made to Tomcat 3.3 this week. I was trying to get my test script that run Watchdog working before starting to port stuff. Tomcat not shutting down was a bit of a problem. I

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Reaper.java

Larry, What bug or bug report is associated with this? Can you give me some clues if you don't know? On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Larry Isaacs wrote: > Arion Yu should get credit for finding this first. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursda

Re: Tomcat 3.2 release (again) ?

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Petr Jiricka wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask where the Tomcat 3.2 final release discussions are right > now. It seemed that the last outstanding issue was the compilation under JDK > 1.1, but that should be fixed now. So is there still something that needs to > be fixed ?

RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

(EVERYONE: Please, PLEASE, leave the threats at the door. Honestly, raising the general level of antagonism is not getting us anywhere!) On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, marc fleury wrote: > Aaron the bundling of APIs (JSP, EJB) that don't work together (JSP doesnt > rely on EJB, and EJB doesnt rely on JSP)

Tomcat 3.2 release (again) ?

Hi, I'd like to ask where the Tomcat 3.2 final release discussions are right now. It seemed that the last outstanding issue was the compilation under JDK 1.1, but that should be fixed now. So is there still something that needs to be fixed ? I would really appreciate if the release could happen

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java

craigmcc00/10/30 10:00:28 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup ContextConfig.java Log: Temporarily comment out the call to permissionsConfig(), because running under a security manager is not yet completed and this messes up (NPE) startin

RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

no be careful 2b is about containment, containment is the STRONGEST, definition of the work is "CMD'ed work" and that is the MBeans in our case (they are GPL). marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard Öberg |Sent: Sunday, Octobe

RE: BugRat Report #213 has been filed.

Has anyone looked at this? It is a real problem for us, and if others agree it should be changed I will get started on a fix. -- Ethan -Original Message- From: BugRat Mail System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 2:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BugRat

AJP13 bug

Hello! There seems to be a bug in jk_ajk13.c when it comes to "authorization" HTTP header. The following code is wrong and authorization header is lost: } else if(!strcmp(header_name, "authorization")) { *sc = SC_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE; } else { The diff follows

Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

Hi! Jon Stevens wrote: > > (Just joking here) We have: > > usefulness(jBoss)+usefulness(Tomcat) <= usefulness(jBoss+Tomcat) > > (synergy), and jBoss+Tomcat == (License problems). > > But usefulness(License problems) == 0, so unless > > we get this sorted out we have to derive: > > usefulness(jBos

Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

>We can both agree that neither of us want to violate >the copyright of the other part, and that each copyright >holder has a right to distribute _his_ copyrighted >works under any license _he_ chooses. power of choice is power of responsibility. You can not choose to claim to distribute under X

Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

Dear all, I've read through the GPL license, and I'm not a legal expert but from what I can see paragraph 2b is a killer. For example, I cannot see how XO3 can redistribute jBoss with Tomcat and reasonably call it "mere aggregation" (i.e. our JMX integration is not "mere aggregation", it is much

Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote: > Dear all, > > I've read through the GPL license, and I'm not a legal expert but from > what I can see paragraph 2b is a killer. For example, I cannot see how > XO3 can redistribute jBoss with Tomcat and reasonably call it "mere > aggregatio

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Reaper.java

Arion Yu should get credit for finding this first. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads Reaper.java larryi 0

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources web_23.dtd

pierred 00/10/30 06:35:52 Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources web_23.dtd Log: Latest web.dtd in sync with catalina. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +83 -25 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources/web_23.dtd Index: web_23.

java.security.policy problems with EmbededTomcat

Hi. I'm having HUGE problems with EmbededTomcat and the Java 2 security manager. I'm trying to start up Tomcat through the EmbededTomcat class and adding one context for the root. Here is the code I'm using: try { EmbededTomcat tc=new EmbededTomcat(); tc.setWorkDir( "c:/