Re: [toaster] SMTP Auth Doesn't work ??

To avoid such messages, disable chkuser logs. This is not the first time I see such message. It looks like chkuser logs are not directed to log channels, but to smtp channel. I'ld like to understand why with chkuser logs, when working with auth, go to smtp channel. Tonino At 20.25 03/02/2005, y

Re: [toaster] CHKUSR setting

In next chkuser version I may do this process automatic, changing it in this way (you may change this within chkuser_settings.h just now): #if defined QMAIL_EXT #define CHKUSER_ENABLE_USERS_EXTENSIONS #endif Is there any other options (#define) I may change automatically? Any suggestion is welco

Re: [toaster] .qmail-list-accept-default

Which are the permission/owner of the list directory? vpopmail should be the owner of that directory (and of the content). Tonino At 15.40 08/03/2005, you wrote: hello all just installed toaster (http://shupp.org/toaster/#prerequisites) setup went without errors... everything works ok, except: qmai

RE: [toaster] .qmail-list-accept-default

Original Message- > From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 5:05 PM > To: toaster@shupp.org > Subject: Re: [toaster] .qmail-list-accept-default > > Which are the permission/owner of the list directory? > > vpopmail should be the

Re: [toaster] chkusr question

Shane, chkuser uses vpopmail APIs for the most of checking, using its own code only when APIs are not available (ezmlm mailing lists, .qmail-default aliases, etc). So chkuser can use whatever DB vpopmail is using. New users in MySQL tables should be cought by vpopmail calls, I don't see any pro

RE: [toaster] .qmail-list-accept-default

- > From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 6:37 PM > To: toaster@shupp.org > Subject: RE: [toaster] .qmail-list-accept-default > > > Speaking about ezmlm lists, chkuser checks for the existance > (i.e. opens > for reading) of

Re: [toaster] chkusr - custom error message

Hi Kania, it depends a lot on which client you're using. Eudora has a good handling of rejected users. chkuser (qmail-smtpd) tells exactly which is the wrong recipient, but some e-mail clients do not handle it. Anyway, I feel chkuser should mainly be used on MX systems, and not on relay syst

Re: [toaster] chkusr - custom error message

At 07.38 25/05/2005, you wrote: I am wondering if there is something which can be done to make chkusr behave more flexible while processing local-to-local sending. Simscan makes it really nice however error message says that first of the scanned attachments is "bad" and email processing is stoppe

[toaster] Bare LF acceptance

After six years, I've found another sender who use bare LF at the end of messages, and I've been forced to modify qmail-smtpd because  the sender is a big company. I've found the patch made by Dean Gaudet in http://www.arctic.org/~dean/patches/qmail-0.95-liberal-lf.patch, and it has solved all

Re: [toaster] chkuser #571 problem

Yes, you have enabled anti intrusion features of chkuser, like maximum number of recipients or maximum number of wrong recipients. When you reach one of these limits (it look you are hitting the max allowed of recipients), you have such a message. You should enable these features only for m

Re: [toaster] Chkuser problem??

At 06.42 27/07/2005, you wrote: Dear all, I found a strange problem in my server. Chkuser seems not work porperly. Here is the information: 2005-07-27 13:07:31.616557500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:> remote rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipie

Re: [toaster] Chkuser problem??

Check all other chkuser #define and see their behaviour. Then check if you have any VARIABLE that influences chkuser. Last attempt, put chkuser debugging to work and see what happens. (some doubts about previous question... slx:~ # vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] no such user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is

Re: [toaster] chkuser problem

At 19.29 06/09/2005, you wrote: Ok. I fixed the problem. I uninstalled the 64-bit version of Suse Enterprise Linux 9 and installed the 32-bit version (the server is running an AMD Opteron). I then went through the install process of Bill's toaster and everything worked just fine. Chkuser wo

Re: [toaster] Strange problem with CHKUSR

At 16.21 13/09/2005, you wrote: Listmembers: I have a domain that is exhibiting really strange behaviour. I recently cleaned out a couple of accounts in this domain, but for some reason CHKUSR insists that the local recipients still exist. Thus spam coming in for these users is still accepted i

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

At 16.36 14/09/2005, you wrote: On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:25 -0700, Tom Collins wrote: > On Sep 14, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Jeff Koch wrote: > > I think what I am really asking is what is the mechanism for the way > > 'catch-all delete' works versus 'catch-all bounce' so I can determine > > which will h

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

This is not a chkuser question. If all il setup correctly, chkuser will not do any action is domain has catchall enabled, so email will be delivered to catchall account. Tonino At 17.10 14/09/2005, you wrote: Perhaps this should be a separate question but since its related to chkusr I though

Re: [toaster] dictionary attacks

Sorry for previous mistyping. This is not a chkuser question. If all is setup correctly, chkuser will not do any action if domain has catchall enabled, so email will be delivered to catchall account. Tonino At 19.14 14/09/2005, you wrote: This is not a chkuser question. If all il setup corr

Re: [toaster] patched qmail fails to compile

At 04.14 20/09/2005, you wrote: Hi Bill. Thanks so much for your very detailed guide. I've managed to get qMail and vpopmail installed a few other times, but I've always had trouble getting SMTP AUTH going, so I'm giving your instructions a shot. Everything in your guide goes smoothly up to

Re: [toaster] patched qmail fails to compile

At 17.00 20/09/2005, you wrote: Alex Dean wrote: Yes, that's correct. Mine is installed in /var/vpopmail. The Makefile had a warning "don't edit this file, use conf* instead". conf-cc had a line referencing /home/vpopmail, which I edited to my location, and it has now compiled correctly. Ton

Re: [toaster] patched qmail fails to compile

At 17.55 20/09/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.00 20/09/2005, you wrote: Alex Dean wrote: Yes, that's correct. Mine is installed in /var/vpopmail. The Makefile had a warning "don't edit this file, use conf* instead". conf-cc had a line referencing /

Re: [toaster] patched qmail fails to compile

At 18.32 20/09/2005, you wrote: Alex Dean wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Shupp said "I used to use conf-vpopmail", which I took to mean it isn't currently in use. Sorry, for a not english motherlanguage is hard to understand at glance "I used to use"... Corr

RE: [toaster] HELP !!! vpopmail - relaying info in mysql

Edvin, delete chkuser.o, make qmail again and install it. Tonino At 17.57 25/10/2005, you wrote: Hi,   how do I recompile chuser ? I’ve followed the process described on the toaster page... so I compiled vpopmail with my options, then applied toasters patch to qmail, recompiled it and installed

Re: [toaster] Run chkuser before greylisting

At 15.59 02/01/2006, you wrote: Dear list, Is that possible to run chkuser first and then greylisting? I found that my domains are forged by spamers. There are a lot of bounced messages which make my servers too busy to take record for greylisting. My idea is that if the user is non-exist, ju

Re: [toaster] chkuser

At 05.14 09/02/2006, you wrote: Is there a way to close a connection after 3 or 4 invalid mailboxes are reached on a single connection? When spammers hit my production server I see multiple emails in the log account that if they could be blocked after 3 or 4 invalid address are reached. It's

Re: [toaster] macrcptcount

At 21.33 14/02/2006, you wrote: Il giorno mar, 14/02/2006 alle 13.18 +0100, Tonix ha scritto: > > > > Hello > > > > Is it working? Seems to not trigger at the limit. Settled to 5 and sent > > an email to 6 recipients and all them got it. > > Check in which way you are setting the limit.

Re: [toaster] Toaster 0.8.7 Update

At 21.34 10/04/2006, you wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: > Yup, it appears in IDX version 486, ( http://ezmlm.org/ChangeLog), they > moved the mailinglist file, which chkuser uses to determine that this is > a mailing list.  So now it appears missing, and chkuser thinks this is > not a mailing list. >

Re: [toaster] Toaster 0.8.7 Update

At 00.39 11/04/2006, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > Bill, actually there could be two alternative solutions: > > 1) select an alternative file that always exists in the directory > (surviving to last ezmlm-idx changes) > 2) enable CHKUSER_ENABLE_ALIAS_DEFAULT : that sho

Re: [toaster] Authentication problem

At 11.53 01/05/2006, you wrote: Hello ! I have a problem and it seems that some people have it also but no one has an answer for it. I've searched thru courierusers mailinglist and thru vpopmail mailing list but i can't find a solution to this matter... Here it goes.. I have a fedora core 5 o

Re: [toaster] testing

At 23.08 13/05/2006, you wrote: Maxwell wrote: > Check. Internet's working. Sorry folks.. that was a failed test. I turned off notifications for non-subscribers on all my ezmlm lists. Those messages just go into the bit-bucket now. Tonino - it would be cool to add a subscriber check to chkus

Re: [toaster] CHKUSER Problem

At 03.41 17/01/2007, you wrote: Sam Laffere wrote: cat .qmail-default | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox If no mailbox for addressee, bounce #| /usr/local/bin/maildrop /home/vpopmail/domains/midkan.com/mailfilter If no mailbox for addressee, send to mailfilter #| /

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

I had to go back at 0.88.x as CPU usage becomes extremely high and clamd hangs. Anyone has the same problem? Tonino At 19.39 14/02/2007, you wrote: I've posted patches for for clamav 0.90 for use with the standard toaster install: http://shupp.org/patches/clamav-0.90-conf.patch http://shupp.

Re: [toaster] clamav 0.90 patches up

At 18.10 18/02/2007, you wrote: I had to go back at 0.88.x as CPU usage becomes extremely high and clamd hangs. Anyone has the same problem? I use FreeBSD. Clamav docs say on FreeBSD and Solaris 0.90 has serious problems. Tonino Tonino At 19.39 14/02/2007, you wrote: I've posted patche

Re: [toaster] AOL port 587

At 02.20 26/02/2007, you wrote: Speedbone wrote: > Hi list, > > sorry if I´m wrong here, but I´m using Bills toaster and I´m obviously > to dump to get this aol port working. Could anyone please give me a clue? I assume you mean you mean you want an alternate SMTP port running for outbound mail.

[toaster] Is clamav 0.90.1 solving previous problems?

Did anyone with problems on clamav 0.90.0 test new 0.90.1 and verified if it solves previous problems? Thanks, Tonino

Re: [toaster] CRLF - LF - Exchange

At 15.05 09/03/2007, you wrote: Ahmet YAZICI wrote: Hello All, One of my client has local MS Exchange server and sometimes they can't send email to real email server installed qmail. Beaceuse of that, i've disabled straynewline function in qmail-smtpd.c . Now it's working.. but i'm not sure if

[toaster] [mail-toaster] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). Short table of changes (more detailed changes in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/changelog.html) * corrected some bugs on MySQL checking (problem was only with so

Re: [toaster] [mail-toaster] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

At 17.07 21/03/2007, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > > Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). > > Short table of changes (more detailed changes in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/downl

Re: [toaster] Quota problem

At 14.18 26/03/2007, you wrote: I know this is not toaster related but i think there are people here that may be of help. I have a huge problem. I'm responsible for mail service of 35-40 clients each of them with a virtual domain. I searched the qmailadmin mailing list in hopes of an answer but

Re: [toaster] Quota problem

At 15.10 26/03/2007, you wrote: I saw your description on the qmailadmin list and i thought that was exactly what i was looking for and i was disapointed that the link you posted was not available. I will be gratefull if you can send me the patch to try it out and see if it matches my need altho

Re: [toaster] Quota problem

At 18.00 26/03/2007, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > This version should also resolve the problem of 2GB limit, as I've > updated all 32 bit variables, and currently I have customers with more > than 2GB quota. Do you have patches for other Maildir++ programs? Like cou

Re: [toaster] checkuser problem

At 23.32 09/05/2007, you wrote: Hello, i found weird behaviour if checkuser with smtp auth If user is autheticated, there is not checked if dest domain is valid (maybe if recips exists) - eg possible to send email to invalid domain. trying to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (yes at end is ')

Re: [toaster] checkuser problem

At 23.32 09/05/2007, you wrote: Hello, i found weird behaviour if checkuser with smtp auth If user is autheticated, there is not checked if dest domain is valid (maybe if recips exists) - eg possible to send email to invalid domain. trying to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' (yes at end is ')

Re: [toaster] checkuser problem

ole source. here is my chkuser_settings.h file. I'm ussing qmail-toaster-0.8.3. Thank you. --- Lampa 2007/5/9, tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 23.32 09/05/2007, you wrote: Hello, i found weird behaviour if checkuser with smtp auth If user is autheticated, there is not c

Re: [toaster] checkuser problem

ole source. here is my chkuser_settings.h file. I'm ussing qmail-toaster-0.8.3. Thank you. --- Lampa 2007/5/9, tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 23.32 09/05/2007, you wrote: Hello, i found weird behaviour if checkuser with smtp auth If user is autheticated, there is not c

[toaster] SPF question

We are receiving a lot of fake e-mails from banks, and we are facing this SPF problem: Most of banks are using SPF, so e-mails should be rejected, but they are accepted because senders are using a forged "From" address, and a real "Return-Path". So, it looks like SPF is checking about the

[toaster] SPF question

We are receiving a lot of fake e-mails from banks, and we are facing this SPF problem: Most of banks are using SPF, so e-mails should be rejected, but they are accepted because senders are using a forged "From" address, and a real "Return-Path". So, it looks like SPF is checking about the

Re: [toaster] help - smtp problem

At 23.20 13/09/2007, you wrote: kenneth chan wrote: Thanks Rick, I did check and my IP is not listed. Actually I can send to some domains like the shupp.org. I think some other domains may have implemented policy to block my domain automatically. Do I need to check my server? or others? Whi

Re: [toaster] help - smtp problem

At 23.20 13/09/2007, you wrote: kenneth chan wrote: Thanks Rick, I did check and my IP is not listed. Actually I can send to some domains like the shupp.org. I think some other domains may have implemented policy to block my domain automatically. Do I need to check my server? or others? Whi

Re: [toaster] help - smtp problem

oks like something you cannot control, as they accept your message and queue it for later delivery. Tonino Kenneth tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 23.20 13/09/2007, you wrote: kenneth chan wrote: Thanks Rick, I did check and my IP is not listed. Actually I can send to some domains like the

Re: [toaster] help - smtp problem

oks like something you cannot control, as they accept your message and queue it for later delivery. Tonino Kenneth tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 23.20 13/09/2007, you wrote: kenneth chan wrote: Thanks Rick, I did check and my IP is not listed. Actually I can send to some domains like the

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-auth-secure integration?

Ingo Claro ha scritto: Hello list: has anyone integrared this patch: http://www.camscape.ro/opensource/qmail-smtpd-auth-secure.htm chkuser already has such feature, enabled by *CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUSTAUTH_VARIABLE.* How much is different what you point from this feature? Tonino ** with this toas

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-auth-secure integration?

cp.smtp to something like :allow, RELAYCLIENT="",CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH ?? Do I need something else ? Regards, E:S *From:* tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Dienstag, 13. November 2007 22:23 *To:* toaster@shupp.org *Subject:* Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-aut

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-auth-secure integration?

Ingo Claro ha scritto: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Ingo Claro ha scritto: Hello list: has anyone integrared this patch: http://www.camscape.ro/opensource/qmail-smtpd-auth-secure.htm chkuser already has such feature, enabled by *CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUSTAUTH_VARIABLE.* How much is different what

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd-auth-secure integration?

Ingo Claro ha scritto: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Ingo Claro ha scritto: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Ingo Claro ha scritto: Hello list: has anyone integrared this patch: http://www.camscape.ro/opensource/qmail-smtpd-auth-secure.htm chkuser already has such feature, enabled by

Re: [toaster] auth only

Lampa ha scritto: Hello, i know but i need auth all users eg forced smtp authentication. No authenticated users should be dropped connection. chkuser within Bill's toaster can force auth. Not authenticated users will be denied sending. Tonino 2007/11/28, Qmail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: [toaster] auth only

Lampa ha scritto: Hello, using older version of chkuser and toaster, option is not available :( Upgrade chkuser to 2.0.9. It's easy. Tonino 2007/11/28, Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Lampa wrote: Hello, i know but i need auth all users eg forced smtp authentication. No aut

Re: [toaster] auth only

it is SET. Tonino In short i SMTPAUTHUSER must be filled before RCPT TO:, if not connection should be dropped with 550 SMTP AUTH required or similar error (530 Authentication required) Thank you. 2007/11/28, tonix (Antonio Nati) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Lampa ha scritto: Hello, usi

Re: [toaster] smtp auth

Satish Alwani ha scritto: Hi, I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2 instances of qmail-smtpd (on 2 different ips). 1 is for the users to send the email from, 1 is for the MX record where their domain can get emails. What I would like to do is the smtp used as relay,

Re: [toaster] CHKUSER

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: I need a little help deciphering what's going on here. CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote rcpt <> : sender accepted I'm getting a ton of these in my log files but the user CHKUSER is reporting is not sending them. I tried commenting them

Re: [toaster] CHKUSER

One of the checks enabled by default in CHKUSER tries to reject fake senders, so if the domain declared in the address does not have an MX entry it is obvious the sender is fake (100%). Are your users conscious they are using an address which does have not a DNS MX entry? sample.secureserver

Re: [toaster] Howto: Bounce addresses on an alias domain...

Rick Macdougall ha scritto: Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Joey Novak ha scritto: Hey Guys, We have a domain that has an alias, and a customer has requested that we bounce all mail sent to his accounts alias on the other domain. i.e. domaina.com <http://domaina.com> is an ali

Re: [toaster] Howto: Bounce addresses on an alias domain...

Joey Novak ha scritto: Hey Guys, We have a domain that has an alias, and a customer has requested that we bounce all mail sent to his accounts alias on the other domain. i.e. domaina.com is an alias for domainb.com . The customer wants [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [toaster] qmail-smtpd to require auth

Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Il Monday 25 February 2008 09:26:58 Lampa ha scritto: Hello, force auth with chkuser CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH="". Check your code source if it's enabled (supported). Hello, where i can find all available options that CHKUSER provides? http://www.interazioni.i

Re: [toaster] chkuser problem on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Zeki, this problem is already known. I have to add this check to chkuser since one year, but I had no time until now. I have a bunch of fixes/features to add, I will try to find spare time and fix them. Thanks, Tonino Kubilay Akyol (Radore Telekom) ha scritto: Hello, I found a problem

Re: [toaster] mails wont send/receive until i restart the service

It looks like a wrong property on a qmail queue file. Check here around in the mailing list, about setting right privilege and ownership on files used for queueing messages. Check files you have and what's raccomended in the most documentation. Regards, Tonino Newbie Qmail ha scritto: Hi i

Re: [toaster] smtp authentication accepting same domain or mappings

Don't forget read/delivery receipts have a null ("<>") mail from. Tonino Satish Alwani ha scritto: Hi, I have a scenario where i have a submission port/ip, where users can relay through and doesnt do any RBL checks as such. However, what i have noticed is that if the user authenticates, he c

Re: [toaster] Weird email not being delivered

Easy it may be a message refused because too big. qmail lacks logging these kind of events. Tonino Rick Macdougall ha scritto: Hi, I've got a strange problem where mail is sent to an existing user, gets scanned by simscan (v1.2) and the just vanishes. qmail-smtpd logs 2008-05-23 08:39:04.0

Re: [toaster] reject invalid sender with chkuser

Geri Anggara ha scritto: Dear All, Is it possible with chkuser, to reject email from outside with return-path contain domain listed in virtualdomains but the user does not exist ? Geri Anggara NOC IndoInternet Jakarta http://www.indo.net.id No, sorry. This feature is in the to-do list , b

Re: [toaster] More than one instance of qmail-send

I will work on this in future, because I'm interested too. I wish to have more queues, with different priorities and bandwith. So I'm studing how to make it, and I hope to have it nextly. Ciao, Tonino Bogdan ha scritto: Hello, I already have 4 instances of qmail-smtpd on my server, and I am

Re: [toaster] chkuser

d...@upnorthwebcreations.com ha scritto: I looked in the archives and found that there apparently is no way for chkuser to reject users that don't exist on my server? If this is correct is there anyway of deflecting them to a bit bucket. I have checked my server over and over again for relay an

Re: [toaster] chkuser

Are vpopmail users or system users? Tonino d...@upnorthwebcreations.com ha scritto: What's happening is I'm getting a lot of rejected emails that say they came from my server from users that don't exist on my server. I've checked the system and everything seems to be OK and the emails I think

Re: [toaster] chkuser

Can you understand where messages are created? If they are created outside -email system, they should not be accepted. If they are generated inside the system, or coming from a trusted system (for which you don't apply chkuser), they are always accepted. Check carefully. Tonino d...@upnorthwe

Re: [toaster] Some e-mail doesn't delivered

Enrico Matteucci ha scritto: Dear Bill, thanks for your work. I have some qmail server installed buit with your toaster, sometime with simscan, sometime with qmail-scanner. All goes well, qmail works fine like vpopmail, clamav, spamassassin and other software, but sometime I get a strange probl

Re: [toaster] Some e-mail doesn't delivered

Enrico Matteucci ha scritto: 2009/1/31 Tonix (Antonio Nati) Enrico Matteucci ha scritto: Dear Bill, thanks for your work. I have some qmail server installed buit with your toaster, sometime with simscan, sometime with qmail-scanner. All goes well, qmail

Re: [toaster] Incoming messages from dynamic Ips

Júlio Manuel Olivares ha scritto: Seems a good option, but how can I disallow non-auth connections ? See CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUST_AUTH_VARIABLE. Ciao, Tonino On 6/12/09 5:27 AM, "Rick Macdougall" wrote: Run another instance on a different port (say 587 or 2500) and only allow authenticate