[toaster] spam: throw some back, send some on ???

I have been using toasters for a couple of years. Thank you, thank you, for providing such a grand framework! We just built a brand spanking new v0.8.1 toaster, installing literally everything mentioned on the site, and everything works as expected. Thank you, again. There are a couple of things

[toaster] spam/virus-check outsourcing ???

I have been using toasters for a couple of years. Thank you, thank you, for providing such a grand framework! We just built a brand spanking new v0.8.1 toaster, installing literally everything mentioned on the site, and everything works as expected. Thank you, again. There are a couple of things

[toaster] migrating from old-toaster to new ???

I have been using toasters for a couple of years. Thank you, thank you, for providing such a grand framework! We just built a brand spanking new v0.8.1 toaster, installing literally everything mentioned on the site, and everything works as expected. Thank you, again. There are a couple of things

Re: [toaster] spam: throw some back, send some on ???

* On 2005:10:27:18:51:52-0500 I, Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, scribed: > With simscan, we are bouncing spam above a certain spamassassin > spam-count (e.g., 10). The balance are passed on, as expected. > > We want to take those that score between 5 and 10, a

[toaster] bounce from: whence comes this address ???

I have a toaster on czar.platinumaire.net. Bounces show a different system: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is one of three (3) retired toasters that are now consolidated/migrated to czar. Where does this bounce-from: come from? Why is it the wrong system? What do you think? -- Best Regard

Re: [toaster] bounce from: whence comes this address ???

* Rick Widmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:10:19:38:31-0700] scribed: > Michael D Schleif wrote: > > >I have a toaster on czar.platinumaire.net. > > > >Bounces show a different system: > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >This is one of t

Re: [toaster] spam/virus-check outsourcing ???

* Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:10:27:22:30:26-0700] scribed: > On Oct 27, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael D Schleif wrote: > >We have a client that runs Groupwise on a Netware server on their LAN. > >We manage everything on this LAN; and, we handle their DNS for their >

Re: [toaster] spam/virus-check outsourcing ???

* Sloath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:14:18:44:49+0100] scribed: > Michael D Schleif wrote on 13/11/2005 07:57: > >* Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:10:27:22:30:26-0700] scribed: > >>On Oct 27, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael D Schleif wrote: > >>>We have

Re: [toaster] spam/virus-check outsourcing ???

* Sloath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:15:15:07:15+0100] scribed: > Michael D Schleif wrote on 15/11/2005 00:01: > >* Sloath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:14:18:44:49+0100] scribed: > >>Michael D Schleif wrote on 13/11/2005 07:57: > >>>* Tom Collins <

Re: [toaster] spam/virus-check outsourcing ???

* Sloath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:15:18:41:38+0100] scribed: > But you're sending from 24.15.252.147 and you have explicilty stated as > relay client, but you have failed to tell it to use simscan for any > email from that address. > > 24.15.252.147:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > So incomming smtp

Re: [toaster] spamassassin - How can I test all?

* "GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:03:02:00:20:00+0100] scribed: > Hello Bill, hello all, > > Ok, now spamd has been started without error messages. ´Thank u Bill. > > How can I test if spamassassin read the queue, and alters mailheaders???

[toaster] clamav-0.90.1 ???

We want to upgrade our clamav. We have found patches for 0.90.0: We cannot find: clamav-0.90.0. Are the above referenced patches ALSO OK for clamav-0.90.1 ??? What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237

[toaster] simscan-1.3.1.shupp2: spam_hits NOT working ???

Last week, we upgraded the toaster, including simscan. Now, spam_hits=10.1 on a domain basis is NOT passing spamassassin tagged messages between 3.5 and 10 -- which several customers want, and WAS previously working. Example: platinumaire.net:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=10.1,attach=.vbs:.ln

Re: [toaster] simscan-1.3.1.shupp2: spam_hits NOT working ???

g: ./configure --enable-user=clamav \ --enable-clamav=y \ --enable-spam=y \ --enable-spam-passthru=y \ --enable-per-domain=y \ --enable-ripmime \ --enable-attach=y \ --enable-received=y > Roman > > > > Michael D Schleif napsal(a): > > Last week, we upgraded the toa

Re: [toaster] simscan-1.3.1.shupp2: spam_hits NOT working ???

ntine > > Maybe you should have > report_safe 1 > in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > > ? > > Roman > > > Michael D Schleif napsal(a): > > Roman => > > > > * Roman Bělonohý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007:06:20:21:10:58+0200] scribed: > &g

[toaster] domainkeys ???

At the bottom of this page: there is the last section, headed thusly: "Now let's compile libdomainkeys, we'll need that later:" I do NOT see where this is later used. What am I missing? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare