* Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:10:27:22:30:26-0700] scribed: > On Oct 27, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Michael D Schleif wrote: > >We have a client that runs Groupwise on a Netware server on their LAN. > >We manage everything on this LAN; and, we handle their DNS for their > >domains. > > > >We want to scrub all of their _incoming_ email on our remote toaster, > >doing what it does best, then forward *ALL* of their email onto that > >Groupwise box. > > Use simscan. Make your server the only MX for the domain. Put the > domain in /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts (or morercpthosts and run > qmail-newmrh). Do *not* add their domain to locals or virtualdomains. > Add an entry in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes to route the scanned mail > to their Groupwise server. > > -- > Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ > You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: > sniffter.com
I finally got back on this one. Yes, setup was simple; and, yes,
messages _do_ go through our toaster, and they _do_ end up in the
Groupwise server.
This setup does *not* appear to work. I am still waiting for the
Groupwise admin to send to me the complete headers for the test
messages; but, I am told that *none* of these test messages include
spamassassin headers.
In fact, the following does *not* show _any_ activity for test messages:
tail -f /var/log/{cl,sp}amd/current
I am not clear which process comes first,
/var/qmail/control/smtproutes
or simscan ???
What do you think?
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
