Here is my qmail-smtpd/run file
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 8000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 \
-x /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
For ssl - did you make certficate and make tmprsadh
(http://www.shupp.org/toaster/?page=vpopmail) ?
For smtp greetings i think that isn't possible (maybe is possible via
some variable), but i think that you must run 2 separate qmail
(separate control files). Maybe sometime i write patch which load
Okay,
used netqmail-1.06, rebuilt with latest qmail-toaster-0.91. Needed
libdomainkeys to compile so got that as well, however the paths were
broken. It needed ../../libdomainkeys whereas its it was in
../libdomainkeys only, so did those changes.
Re-checked, MUSTAUTH works fine. , but my ssl
If you are using shupp toaster, use shupp's howto
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/. Which seems using new version (0.9.1).
in netqmail 1.06 aren't any significant changes (there is need to
patch base qmail-1.03 and contains already error.h patch)
So my suggestion is start from clean with shupp toast
So do you think i should recompile once again using the latest patches?
im using the old patches with netqmail-1.06 and updated chkuser.
Considering its a crazy hybrid system, would appreciate your input on
suggestions
Satish
Lampa wrote, On 2007-12-30 1:11 AM:
Hmm, little weird.
i'm using h
Hmm, little weird.
i'm using http://www.shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.9.1.patch.bz2
eg patch 0.9.1.
on main patch is link to older version but on
http://www.shupp.org/toaster/?page=gettingstarted
is to the newer version (0.9.1)
To Shupp: please update main page to point to latest patch vers
actually i see the problem. the patch is of 2.0.8, you need 2.0.9 to
make it work.
I had to go to http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/ and get the
latest update tarball. After that it seems to be working.
This seems to have fixed the problem.
Perhaps we can move the 2.0.9 patch into the
Hello,
in log is something ? Relayclient is not set, because if is set user
can sent email?
2007/12/29, Satish Alwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> okay added that line.. recompiled as well, (make; make setup check )
> however its still not working. for now i am trying to do it on my ip
> address
okay added that line.. recompiled as well, (make; make setup check )
however its still not working. for now i am trying to do it on my ip address
ip.add.re.ss:allow,CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH=""
any suggestions on this? I also do have this going to qmail-scanner-st
as my default qmail-queue
Satish
Lam
i'm using 2 separate cdb files (one with MUSTAUTH for local users and
second for public mx) - two ip adresses
2007/12/29, Satish Alwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> But it should work if i have 2 seperate cdb files to do this right? one for
> the local users / 1 for the public internet to MX to
>
>
But it should work if i have 2 seperate cdb files to do this right? one
for the local users / 1 for the public internet to MX to
Satish
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote, On 2007-12-29 6:51 PM:
Satish Alwani ha scritto:
Hi,
I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2
instances o
Hello,
you should have #define CHKUSER_EXTRA_MUSTAUTH_VARIABLE
"CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH" enabled (in chkuser_settings.h) and in tcp.smtp
CHKUSER_MUSTAUTH="" and RELAYCLIENT="" must be deleted or it will be
not working.
If you change anything in chkuser_settings.h, qmail must be recompiled
and installed
Satish Alwani ha scritto:
Hi,
I have the qmail-toaster-0.8.3.patch, I am currently running 2
instances of qmail-smtpd (on 2 different ips). 1 is for the users to
send the email from, 1 is for the MX record where their domain can get
emails.
What I would like to do is the smtp used as relay,
On Aug 3, 2007, at 5:28 AM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
On 8/3/07, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
Hello,
I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
she can send email with whatever sender a
On 8/3/07, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
> > she can send email with whatever sender address.
> > My question, is there a way to restric
On Aug 2, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Muhammad Mukmin Pattikraton wrote:
Hello,
I know when someone has authenticated via SMTP AUTH mechanism, he or
she can send email with whatever sender address.
My question, is there a way to restrict the sender address with the
address that being used to authenticate
Max Andersen wrote:
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Do you have another SMTP proxy in front of your system? That proxy
probably does not implement some SMTP extensions.
The cisco box was the reason. removed the fixup smtp or similar did the job.
Sincerely
Max
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographi
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Do you have another SMTP proxy in front of your system? That proxy
probably does not implement some SMTP extensions.
I've just investigated, and My cisco 806 at home does not have the fixup
smtp configuration, and the router is all that is between me and the
mailserver.
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:19:51 +0200
Max Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet linux01.netformidling.dk 25
> Trying ...
> Connected to linux01.netformidling.dk.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 linux01.netformidling.dk ESMTP
> ehlo test
> 502
Do you have another SMTP pr
Max Andersen wrote:
Hi,
How do I test the smtp-auth ?
I do seem to have been running smtp-auth, but now my servere rejects
me when I try :(
I've dug a bit deeper and see this:
when connecting from the lan I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# telnet linux01.netformidling.dk 25
T
On Jan 20, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Bruno Negrao wrote:
My question is, if I set TCPREMOTEINFO in my tcprules for that machine,
will it release the machine from authentication?
If you set RELAYCLIENT, you won't have to authenticate.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.s
Ok, setting TCPREMOTEINFO in tcp.smtp file works.
bnegrao.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruno Negrao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:44 PM
Subject: [toaster] SMTP AUTH: Setting TCPREMOTEINFO for an IP can release
it from smtp authentication?
Hi guys,
I en
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 19:57 +0800, aim mix wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> can someone explain to me why ?
>
> my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
>
> ...
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd HOSTNAME \
> /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1
>
> ...
>
>if the word HOSTNAME there the sm
Greetings,
can someone explain to me why ?
my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
... /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd HOSTNAME \ /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /bin/true 2>&1
...
if the word HOSTNAME there the smtp-auth won't work. it must be blank then the smtp-auth will work. i don't know w
thank you very much. i will test it today.
On 1/16/06, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
aim mix wrote:> thanks bill.>>In my tcp.smtp>>127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>> xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan">:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/sims
aim mix wrote:
thanks bill.
In my tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
:allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
where xx.xx.xx.xx is my ip address, do i need to remove my ip address
in order to
thanks bill.
In my tcp.smtp
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan" :allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan"
where xx.xx.xx.xx is my ip address, do i need to remove my ip address in order to make smtp-auth work ?
aim mix wrote:
Greetings all,
hi, i need to know how to do smtp-auth based on shupp toaster.
in the frontpage,
To do SMTP-AUTH, and chkuser, you need to run qmail-smtpd as user
vpopmail, group vchkpw if you plan on using this with vpopmail (the
certificates are chowned vpopmail for this r
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:06:16AM -0800, Bill Shupp wrote:
> >What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
> >and rblsmtpd? I want to allow users with SMTP-AUTH from addresses that
> >are in rbl lists or no reverse DNS entry.
> >
> >I dont want to bind another qmail-
Erki-Kiss Zsolt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:29:02PM +0100, rene marticke wrote:
i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
Hm, http://linux-vserv
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:29:02PM +0100, rene marticke wrote:
> i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
> ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
> the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
Hm, http://linux-vserver.org/ sounds great! But yet
Erki-Kiss Zsolt wrote:
What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
and rblsmtpd? I want to allow users with SMTP-AUTH from addresses that
are in rbl lists or no reverse DNS entry.
I dont want to bind another qmail-smtpd to another port than 25. I have a
lot of user
Hi,
i solved this by installing another qmail without rblsmtp on another
ip-adress at the same host using vserver.
the second on use mysql-tables from master and so it's up2date.
regards
rene
Erki-Kiss Zsolt schrieb:
What is the best way to use SMTP-AUTH and tcpserver's reverse DNS checking
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the suggesstion about logging for MySQL. I will give
that a try. Yes, i did try using AUTH PLAIN and it too doesn't work.
I also compiled vpopmail with clear passwords as well. Just as a
test, i recompiled vpopmail with roaming-users on, and it works fine.
BUT if I enabl
On 9/25/05, Jason (AMD_) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good Evening Bill,
> Still having my smtp auth problem here :( I just got done doing a
> complete reinstall of vpopmail and qmail using your guide and it still
> won't work. The weird thing is that I am getting this error when
> tryingto d
Good Evening Bill,
Still having my smtp auth problem here :( I just got done doing a
complete reinstall of vpopmail and qmail using your guide and it still
won't work. The weird thing is that I am getting this error when
tryingto do a manual SMTP 'AUTH LOGIN' (after i enter my username and
pa
Bill,
I just looked in my logs and saw this:
vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAILADDY]:[IPADDY]
The email address is correct though. Authentication via pop3d works
fine with it. It's like the smtp auth isn't looking up the password
in MySQL's db or something???
-- HP
On 9/24/05, Jas
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the quick response.
It was running as root:qmail but I changed it to vpopmail:vchkpw and
restarted the services but it still won't work :( The weird thing is
it's even making me authenticate (or try to authenticate) when sending
to local domains as well.
-- HP
On 9/24/05,
Jason (AMD_) wrote:
Hi,
Let me first say what an awesome resource this is :) Thanks!
Now then, I've got a working toaster install EXCEPT for smtp-auth.
Here is my qmail-smtpd/run file:
exec softlimit -m 1000 \
tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 \
-x /var/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$M
Hi,
I'm not sure if this patch applies correctly against the Toaster, but I
have been using this patch (was originally against qmail-1.03 and now
applies against netqmail-1.05) for years.
control/smtproutes has the following format using this patch :-
{domain}:{relay host}:{relay port}:{relay u
Glen wrote:
Hi,
I want to add the
qmail-authentication-0.6.4 patch to the toaster. because i want to
relay mail to authenticated server. Just now its with
the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.5.7 patch
Is there any way we can include
this toaster
Thanks in advance
I too would lik
Hi Shane & all
Computer hosting linux FC4:
IPs: eth0:192.168.1.25(master.mydomain.local)
eth0.1:192.168.1.26(smtp.mydomain.local)
eth0.2:192.168.1.27(imap.mydomain.local)
eth0.3:192.168.1.28(www.mydomain.local)
Toaster Installed: Shupp.org
tcp.smtp:{
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
} (1
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:42 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> Thanks Shane.
>
> The message is sent from telnet or outlook without
> errors BUT
> it Did arrive to its destination when sending from
> outlook (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no smtp auth) but did not
> arrive when sending through telnet...
>
> why
Thanks Shane.
The message is sent from telnet or outlook without
errors BUT
it Did arrive to its destination when sending from
outlook (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] & no smtp auth) but did not
arrive when sending through telnet...
why is this behaviour ?
--- Shane Chrisp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:26 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> tcp.smtp have the following 3 lines:
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> qmailctl cdb
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
That is why your able to relay without Auth. Its bypassing the smtpauth
and setting the RELAYCLIENT
tcp.smtp have the following 3 lines:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
qmailctl cdb
--- Shane Chrisp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you add anything to the tcp.smtp file?
>
>
Dimsh
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 00:23 -0700, Dimsh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have successfully installed the Toaster from
> shupp.org, and it works fine and do authenticate well.
>
> but it also accept sending without authentication !
> and this is what I want not to happen.
>
> Through "telnet 192.168.1.x 2
yeah, this is correct, i use a empf patch to force authentication, in
local domains
http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf
Em Ter, 2005-07-26 às 14:00 -0300, Carlos Cesario escreveu:
> Hi peoples
>
>
>I'm testing smtp-auth and I don't understand thing.
>I have 2 virtual doamins and when I s
Nick Gilbert wrote:
PS:
I also have this line in /var/log/maillog
May 16 20:56:23 blue vpopmail[22654]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not
found nick@:127.0.0.1
..which implies that perhaps it's only looking for vpopmail users rather
than /etc/passwd users.
I would like it to work for /etc/passwd u
PS:
I also have this line in /var/log/maillog
May 16 20:56:23 blue vpopmail[22654]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not
found nick@:127.0.0.1
..which implies that perhaps it's only looking for vpopmail users rather
than /etc/passwd users.
I would like it to work for /etc/passwd users only, or both -
Abel Lucano wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bill Shupp wrote:
Thanks Bill for your quick answer,
Entourage 9 (10) at least seems doesn't like SMTP-AUTH to enable relay.
My provisory workaround is recompile toaster's vpopmail with
--enable-roaming-users
I'm concerned about this scheme: is it just "un-
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Bill Shupp wrote:
> Abel Lucano wrote:
>
> >Hi there,
> >
> >scenario:
> >netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
> >vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
> >
> >Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
> >"smtp-authenticated"; I'
Abel Lucano wrote:
Hi there,
scenario:
netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
"smtp-authenticated"; I've noticed that these email clients (Entourage
mainly) makes APOP aut
> I installed the toaster on a test server and noticed that mail coming
> from authenticated users is not scanned by simscan. I would like to
> scan all outgoing mail for viruses even from authenticated users. Is it
> possible to modify the SMTP-AUTH patch to scan outgoing messages with
> simscan
@shupp.org
Asunto: Re: [toaster] SMTP Auth Doesn't work ??
On Feb 4, 2005, at 6:19 AM, David wrote:
> At the 127.0.0.1 and in the DMZ looks:
>
>
> 220 ESMTP
>
>
>
> But out looks:
>
> 220
>
> It's normal?
No. This has come up before t
On Feb 4, 2005, at 6:19 AM, David wrote:
At the 127.0.0.1 and in the DMZ looks:
220 ESMTP
But out looks:
220
It’s normal?
No. This has come up before though, on this list last November, here's
the answer:
http://www.mail-archive.com/toaster@shupp.org/msg01905.html
You
el: dijous, 3 / febrer / 2005 20:51
Para: toaster@shupp.org
Asunto: Re: [toaster] SMTP Auth Doesn't work ??
To avoid such messages, disable chkuser logs.
This is not the first time I see such message.
It looks like chkuser logs are not directed to log channels, but to smtp
channel
To avoid such messages, disable chkuser logs.
This is not the first time I see such message.
It looks like chkuser logs are not directed to log channels, but to smtp
channel.
I'ld like to understand why with chkuser logs, when working with auth, go
to smtp channel.
Tonino
At 20.25 03/02/2005, y
Thanks Tom, smtp-auth patch upgrade has something about this, released
yesterday. Should be very complex to upgrade this patch on 0.7b3 with
chkusr-mysql? Probably is what I need.
More details on http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
From changelog:
Version 0.51 includes the evaluation of the
On Sep 15, 2004, at 3:42 AM, Eduardo Cortés wrote:
is there any "easy way" to include on logs (qmail-scanner-queue.pl
should be
the better place) the smtp auth information? You can see on logs each
authentication, but in a server with some thousands of accounts,
should be
great to know who authen
On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:19 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
004-08-08 19:40:39.658546500 94306 > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
004-08-08 19:40:39.899217500 94306 < AUTH PLAIN
004-08-08 19:40:39.899534500 94306 > 334
004-08-08 19:40:40.140874500 94306 <
AGx1Y2FzQHZhbGRlb24ubmV0AE1hcmdhcml0YTI0
004-08-08 19:
Hi all
I use FREEBSD's NFS service, in MAILSERVER ,I mount /var/qmail/control & users to
NFS Server.then I use 'make setup check'to setup qmail ,just install instcheck ,error
chown /var/qmail/control error Permission denied, Who can talk me why? Thx
my english is so pool ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
> I think that the problem is in some of configuration fi
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
> I think that the problem is in some of configuration fi
On Jun 30, 2004, at 7:11 PM, John Doe wrote:
I think that the problem is in some of configuration files, because
when I
remove
from vpopmail defaultdomain file my domain and added my domain in qmail
locals file
the email is not recived to user and log is:
Jul 1 04:43:10 ns qmail: 1088646190.28257
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 6:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [toaster] SMTP-AUTH does not work for me.
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
> I read lots of documntation in network but nothing about
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
I read lots of documntation in network
but nothing about my problem. I still can send email without
authorization
and qmail-smtpd
does not block these emails.
If you host a.net and you're sending mail to a.net, you don't need to
authenticate.
If you t
Any body know what is the problem in my case ?
here are a header from server when I send email:
2351 > 220 a.net ESMTP
2351 < EHLO condorc8y1adjr
2351 > 250-a.net
2351 > 250-STARTTLS
2351 > 250-PIPELINING
2351 > 250-8BITMIME
2351 > 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5
2351 < MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL P
Oh sorry,
I didn't realized that change.
I tried it and it works great.
You realy did a fantastic work!
Thank you.
dimaki
--
+++ Jetzt WLAN-Router für alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++
GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
dimaki wrote:
Hi,
I installed a new version of netqmail-1.05 with the 'Large Qmail patch' but
SMTP-AUTH isn't working.
I had an running qmail-1.03 with older patches. So I took a new
netqmail-1.05 and only aplied the 'Large qmail patch' without errors.
compiled without errors, installed and started
Don't know if this works on Mac, but I have used this on Windows before:
http://email.about.com/library/daily/et/blet021804_1.htm
Mike
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi:
Is there any logging or debugging available with the mysql smtp-auth
routines?
We have a situation in which users from one domain can't
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 08:20 AM, Héja Tibor wrote:
I'm using the 0.5 patch. I tried to find the way to send the
badmailfrom-badmailto and mfcheck rejection messages to my smtpd
logfile. There is a patch at http://www.svm.cz/~jirka/qmail/ for this,
I wrote the differences into the smtpd.c
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 08:06 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
> Bill Shupp wrote:
>> Remember that if you have roaming users on, you will be able to relay
>> after popping in. Check the contents of your open-smtp file, and make
>> sure your test IP is not in there. If it is, remove it, run qma
On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 01:39 PM, Nicholas Chua wrote:
> After upgrading vpopmail-5.14 to vpopmail-5.3.8, qmailadmin1.02 to
> qmailadmin 1.06, maildrop1.3 to maildrop1.4 and spamassassin2.31 to
> spamassasin2.42, auth does not work anymore.
>
> [root@ahead contrib]# telnet localhost
74 matches
Mail list logo
