Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 6, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: If they are still there, then it's pretty likely that the messages were retried anyway. Perhaps someone will have a method for getting them into the queue. But if I were you, I'd just archive it, and remove it from /var/qmail/simscan. If the fil

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: > Problem fixed! The problem was related to severely crippled downstream > because of a switch misconfiguration that resulted in packet collisions, > and very poor performance. it is my guess that simscan simply gave up > waiting on downloading of messages with fairly large a

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-06 Thread Alexey Amerik
Problem fixed! The problem was related to severely crippled downstream because of a switch misconfiguration that resulted in packet collisions, and very poor performance. it is my guess that simscan simply gave up waiting on downloading of messages with fairly large attachments . Thank y

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-05 Thread Tom Collins
On Apr 4, 2007, at 11:34 PM, Bill D'Anjou wrote: For me, the problem seemed to arise when we were under a spam attack. It appears as though simscan could not keep up under the load (or is spamassassin the problem?). Are there faster, more robust alternatives to consider? FYI, I am running gre

RE: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-05 Thread Abel Lucano
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Bill D'Anjou wrote: > For me, the problem seemed to arise when we were under a spam attack. > It appears as though simscan could not keep up under the load (or is > spamassassin the problem?). Are there faster, more robust alternatives > to consider? Maybe not directly relate

RE: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Bill D'Anjou
y reduces the amount of spam (& viruses) that get thru. Bill D -Original Message- From: Alexey Amerik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:52 PM To: toaster@shupp.org Subject: Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan It does not appear that the message makes it to clamd or s

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
It does not appear that the message makes it to clamd or spamd. On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Alexey Amerik wrote: 2007-04-04 18:26:44.830410500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 66.249.82.227> rcpt <> : sender accepted 2007-04-04 18:26:45.087796500 CHKUSER accepted rcp

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
2007-04-04 18:26:44.830410500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 66.249.82.227> rcpt <> : sender accepted 2007-04-04 18:26:45.087796500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote 66.249.82.227> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient 2007-04-04

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Rick Macdougall
Alexey Amerik wrote: Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle @4

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: > Yes, it is working according to the message headers: > *X-Spam-Checker-Version: * SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on > mail.tournament1.com > *X-Spam-Level:** * > *X-Spam-Status: * No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 > autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 > > But it doesnt like

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
simscan queue does back up, and spamd begins to max out the cpu. On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote: Alexey Amerik wrote: Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489]

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Yes, it is working according to the message headers: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.tournament1.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 But it doesnt like attachments!? On Apr 4,

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Alexey Amerik wrote: > Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: > > @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering > state 1 > @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 > @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Also Im spamd logs with debug enabled I see this: @400046141a6c3a9a673c [4489] dbg: prefork: child 23924: entering state 1 @400046141a6c3a9c4b9c [4489] dbg: prefork: new lowest idle kid: 23924 @400046141a6c3a9d3dcc [4489] dbg: prefork: child reports idle @400046141a6c3a9eeb7c

Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
At any given time while things are turned on this is what I see for spamd in process list..can someone confirm if this is correct: root 4489 2.9 1.9 33576 31064 ? S16:32 0:05 /usr/ bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -D -x -u vpopmail -s stderr vpopmail 4525 22.2 3.2 53724 50968

[toaster] messages stuck in simscan

2007-04-04 Thread Alexey Amerik
Hello all, Some important messages are getting stuck in /var/qmail/simscan. Currently the dir is totalling 14 megabytes. I am scratching my head here as there is nothing thats obviously wrong. Can someone, anyone, please assist? I've been at it for a week almost. thanks, Alexey