I had the same problem several months ago and posted a similar question
here, "is there a way to 'process' messages that are left behind in
simscan's working directory?"  I didn't get a response and it's starting
to look like you're not getting a resolution either.  I ended up having
to turn off spamd & clamd scanning.  Yes, more spam is getting thru now
but having customers lose their e-mail due to my server issue(s) is not
acceptable.  I can't risk turning it back on until I'm certain it won't
happen again.

For me, the problem seemed to arise when we were under a spam attack.
It appears as though simscan could not keep up under the load (or is
spamassassin the problem?).  Are there faster, more robust alternatives
to consider?  FYI, I am running greylisting which seems to hold up under
any load & considerably reduces the amount of spam (& viruses) that get
thru.

Bill D

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Amerik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:52 PM
To: toaster@shupp.org
Subject: Re: [toaster] messages stuck in simscan

It does not appear that the message makes it to clamd or spamd.


On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Alexey Amerik wrote:

> 2007-04-04 18:26:44.830410500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote <wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown:
> 66.249.82.227> rcpt <> : sender accepted
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.087796500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote <wx-out-0506.google.com:unknown:
> 66.249.82.227> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing 
> recipient
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155187500 simscan: cdb looking up
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155290500 simscan: cdb for  found 
> clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_passthru=yes,attach=.vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.p
> if
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155343500 simscan: pelookup clam = yes
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155365500 simscan: pelookup spam = yes
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155383500 simscan: pelookup spam_passthru = yes
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155406500 simscan: spampassthru = yes/1
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155423500 simscan: pelookup attach = 
> .vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155441500 simscan: attachment flag attach = 
> .vbs:.lnk:.scr:.wsh:.hta:.pif
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155468500 simscan: .vbs is attachment number 0
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155486500 simscan: .lnk is attachment number 1
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155503500 simscan: .scr is attachment number 2
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155521500 simscan: .wsh is attachment number 3
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155538500 simscan: .hta is attachment number 4
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155555500 simscan: .pif is attachment number 5
> 2007-04-04 18:26:45.155590500 simscan: starting: work dir: /var/
> qmail/simscan/1175725605.155567.6415
>
> thats the last message I see in smtpd/current log,
>
> turning to pid list, I see this clamav    6415  0.0  0.0  1696   
> 444 ?        S    18:26   0:00 /var/qmail/bin/simscan
>
> total other simscan pid's:
>
> clamav   31820  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:04   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav   32614  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:08   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav     501  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:09   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav     708  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:09   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav    1469  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:12   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav    4938  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:22   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav    6415  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:26   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav    7000  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:28   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan
> clamav    7352  0.0  0.0  1696  444 ?        S    18:29   0:00 /var/ 
> qmail/bin/simscan

Reply via email to