Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

2006-04-04 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Tuesday 04 Apr 2006 19:16, Nikki Locke wrote: > Ken Schweigert wrote: > > On 4/4/06, Nikki Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like to use the Bayesian spam filter. To that end, I need all > > > the users here to be able to mark mail as spam, so it can be sent > > > through sa- learn.

Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

2006-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Nikki Locke wrote: > Thanks for that - I'm playing with it now. I notice that SquirrelMail 1.4 is > now up to version 1.4.6, which contains some important-looking security > fixes. > Hmm, I wonder if it is safe to install it over what I have from the toaster? Yes, it is. Bill

Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

2006-04-04 Thread Nikki Locke
Ken Schweigert wrote: > On 4/4/06, Nikki Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to use the Bayesian spam filter. To that end, I need all the > > users here to be able to mark mail as spam, so it can be sent through sa- > > learn. Ideally I think I need to be able to submit non-spam ma

Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

2006-04-04 Thread Ken Schweigert
On 4/4/06, Nikki Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to use the Bayesian spam filter. To that end, I need all the > users here to be able to mark mail as spam, so it can be sent through sa- > learn. Ideally I think I need to be able to submit non-spam mail too. > Squirrelmail has a lot

[toaster] changing bounce msg

2006-04-04 Thread Qmail List
Hi, How can i simplified the bounce message? I would like the bounce message to tell the reason why it bounce only. i do not want to know anymore details and the attachment if it has one. regards

Re: [toaster] Rejecting invalid mail addresses at the RCPT TO stage

2006-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Nikki Locke wrote: > Bill Shupp wrote: >> Nikki Locke wrote: >>> Is there an easy way of getting qmail's SMTP server to reject invalid >>> >>> addresses at the RCPT TO stage? >>> >>> >>> It would save a lot of disk space and processing power when I'm hit with >>> thousands of spams a day. >

Re: [toaster] Security updates to toaster programs

2006-04-04 Thread Bill Shupp
Nikki Locke wrote: > I'm a CentOS user, and I'm used to getting security patches for all the > programs I installed using yum or up2date. > > Now I've compiled so much stuff fropm source, with numerous patches, how do > I stand as far as security updates are concerned? Are any security-related

[toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

2006-04-04 Thread Nikki Locke
I would like to use the Bayesian spam filter. To that end, I need all the users here to be able to mark mail as spam, so it can be sent through sa- learn. Ideally I think I need to be able to submit non-spam mail too. How do people achieve this? I have seen suggestions that I implement a shared

[toaster] Security updates to toaster programs

2006-04-04 Thread Nikki Locke
I'm a CentOS user, and I'm used to getting security patches for all the programs I installed using yum or up2date. Now I've compiled so much stuff fropm source, with numerous patches, how do I stand as far as security updates are concerned? Are any security-related updates announced on this lis

Re: [toaster] Just installed the toaster, got a suggestion which may improve it

2006-04-04 Thread Nikki Locke
Bill Shupp wrote: > Nikki Locke wrote: > > Just a note for Bill... > > > > In my CentOS 4 default configuration, when you attempt to copy or move a > > file over one that already exists, the O/S asks you if it is OK for each > > file. This makes some of the instructions tedious (e.g. "mv ezmlm

Re: [toaster] Rejecting invalid mail addresses at the RCPT TO stage

2006-04-04 Thread Nikki Locke
Bill Shupp wrote: > Nikki Locke wrote: > > Is there an easy way of getting qmail's SMTP server to reject invalid > > > > addresses at the RCPT TO stage? > > > > > > It would save a lot of disk space and processing power when I'm hit with > > thousands of spams a day. > > This is already