Re: [toaster] chkusr - custom error message

2005-05-24 Thread Tomek
On Tue, 24 May 2005, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > it depends a lot on which client you're using. Eudora has a good handling > of rejected users. chkuser (qmail-smtpd) tells exactly which is the wrong > recipient, but some e-mail clients do not handle it. That's true. "chkusr" message is clear i

Re: [toaster] chkusr - custom error message

2005-05-24 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Kania, it depends a lot on which client you're using. Eudora has a good handling of rejected users. chkuser (qmail-smtpd) tells exactly which is the wrong recipient, but some e-mail clients do not handle it. Anyway, I feel chkuser should mainly be used on MX systems, and not on relay syst

[toaster] chkusr - custom error message

2005-05-24 Thread Tomek
Hello, As you probably know there is possibility to patch simscan to give custom error messages while forbidden attachment is being sent. I am wondering if something similar can be done to make qmail inform sender why his e-mail (set to 20-30 receipients _locally_) was rejected. Currently, err

Re: [toaster] toaster throughput

2005-05-24 Thread Rene
Fabrizio Frosali - Impulso Srl wrote: Hi all, I've to send a lot of emails (500.000) in little time (30 mins) (all legitimate emails: last minute infos) I need some advice on hardware and configuration to use. i.e. How much can I raise concurrencyremote on a 3 GHz Pentium 4 Server with 2 GB R

[toaster] toaster throughput

2005-05-24 Thread Fabrizio Frosali - Impulso Srl
Hi all, I've to send a lot of emails (500.000) in little time (30 mins) (all legitimate emails: last minute infos) I need some advice on hardware and configuration to use. i.e. How much can I raise concurrencyremote on a 3 GHz Pentium 4 Server with 2 GB RAM ? (Bandwidth is not a problem) than

Re: [toaster] Qmail Headers

2005-05-24 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 08:59 -0700, Bill Shupp wrote: > FWIW, just yesterday I was able to use qmail's syntax to help prove > that email headers were forged for spam sent out using one of my > client's domains. So I find it useful. > > And no, I've never looked into doing what you're asking. I

Re: [toaster] Qmail Headers

2005-05-24 Thread Bill Shupp
Shane Chrisp wrote: Ive been asked if there is a simple way to change the received headers that qmail sticks into an email to include whats being touted nowdays as being the default standard in the form of (mail.domain.com [1.2.3.4]) rather than the way qmail currently handles things with just t

[toaster] Qmail Headers

2005-05-24 Thread Shane Chrisp
Ive been asked if there is a simple way to change the received headers that qmail sticks into an email to include whats being touted nowdays as being the default standard in the form of (mail.domain.com [1.2.3.4]) rather than the way qmail currently handles things with just the (1.2.3.4) and every