On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 09:07:07PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> On 09.01.15 20:48 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> > Can we stop with these rather silly suggestions for other software we
> > don't need?
>
> Apparently nobody understands that I am the maintainer for the tmux Portfile
> in MacPorts a
On 09.01.15 20:48 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> Can we stop with these rather silly suggestions for other software we
> don't need?
Apparently nobody understands that I am the maintainer for the tmux Portfile
in MacPorts and that I want to allow people to install the latest version from
git via MacPorts.
On 10 January 2015 at 00:26, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> On 09.01.15 5:14 , Thomas Adam wrote:
>> There's already a repo there if you want to use that.
>
> It s not the main repo, is it? It is also not a mirror, with automatic pushes
> to it when the sf repo is updated.
When master is updated
Hi Helmut,
On 8 January 2015 at 17:13, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> On 08.01.15 18:51 , Thomas Adam wrote:
>> https://github.com/ThomasAdam/tmux-ut
>
> Have you ever thought of moving the sf repo to github?
>
> With sourceforge it is impossible to download the latest git snapshot without
> web i
On 09.01.15 5:14 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> There's already a repo there if you want to use that.
It s not the main repo, is it? It is also not a mirror, with automatic pushes
to it when the sf repo is updated.
> Which I do for other projects, but it's not useful for tmux, because we're
> not continu
On 09.01.15 3:27 , Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> github does not offer mailing lists
I was talking about the main repository, not the mailing list.
--
regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek
lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D
/*
Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:13:40PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> On 08.01.15 18:51 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> > https://github.com/ThomasAdam/tmux-ut
>
> Have you ever thought of moving the sf repo to github?
There's already a repo there if you want to use that.
> On github you could also in
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 02:39:44AM +, Anish R Athalye wrote:
> There is a (semi-official) GitHub mirror as well:
> https://github.com/ThomasAdam/tmux.
Semi-official is misleading. It's always kept up to date with SF, because
I'm the one who helps maintain the SF one. You can use either, and
github does not offer mailing lists
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:13:40PM -0500, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> On 08.01.15 18:51 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> > https://github.com/ThomasAdam/tmux-ut
>
> Have you ever thought of moving the sf repo to github?
>
> With sourceforge it is impossible to dow
On 08.01.15 21:39 , Anish R Athalye wrote:
> Homebrew has no issue with installing the latest commit. `brew install --HEAD
> tmux` suffices; it pulls from the SourceForge repository.
> See https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/tmux.rb
> for
> more details.
Apparently Ho
Homebrew has no issue with installing the latest commit. `brew install --HEAD
tmux` suffices; it pulls from the SourceForge repository. See
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/tmux.rb for
more details.
There is a (semi-official) GitHub mirror as well:
https://githu
On 08.01.15 18:51 , Thomas Adam wrote:
> https://github.com/ThomasAdam/tmux-ut
Have you ever thought of moving the sf repo to github?
With sourceforge it is impossible to download the latest git snapshot without
web interaction. The snapshot is only created _after_ clicking the 'Download
snapshot
Hi all,
I've put together something I'm calling 'tmux-ut', it's a repository
which will hopefully form a set of tests to run against tmux, ensuring
that tmux remains stable as we develop more features, fix bugs, etc.
This isn't officially part of tmux, but it's the sort of things some of
you here
13 matches
Mail list logo
