How about this?
Not changed substantially, just renamed some bits as discussed.
Index: mode-key.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/tmux/mode-key.c,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -r1.30 mode-key.c
--- mode-key.c 1 Feb 2010 22:15
I'll put it in tonight.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote:
> Have you had a chance to look at this yet? (Just prodding)
>
> It's the vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff one; it introduced "non-whitespace"
> word-skipping movement commands.
>
> I'd like this patch to get in before I sta
Have you had a chance to look at this yet? (Just prodding)
It's the vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff one; it introduced "non-whitespace"
word-skipping movement commands.
I'd like this patch to get in before I start working on the numeric
command-prefix stuff, so I don't have to rework this patch to adjust for
On Mon-2010/01/25-22:53 Micah Cowan wrote:
> Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>> I'd make this something like enum window_copy_search_mode,
>> WINDOW_COPY_WORDSTART, WINDOW_COPY_WORDEND.
>
> OOC, why do you bother with such namespaces in locally-scoped
> definitions?
I like Nicholas' code very much, it
I've committed the e diff, I'll look at the other one later on.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:09:44PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote:
> New version of the patch. It's now split into two separate diffs, and
> meant to apply after your reworking of window_copy_cursor_next_word
> (which isn't in Sourceforge
New version of the patch. It's now split into two separate diffs, and
meant to apply after your reworking of window_copy_cursor_next_word
(which isn't in Sourceforge CVS yet). As you requested, I used a copy of
that function, rather than introducing a flag (so the enum definition's
gone, too).
Apo
Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the diff,
>
> I think I'd prefer to see a change to add a vi-style next-word now and the
> nonspace stuff separately, if that is possible. If it is going to be too
> time-consuming don't worry.
I'll try and get you that tonight (PST).
>> Index: mode-
Hi
Thanks for the diff,
I think I'd prefer to see a change to add a vi-style next-word now and the
nonspace stuff separately, if that is possible. If it is going to be too
time-consuming don't worry.
> Index: mode-key.c
> ===
> ---
= Background =
I've noticed that the "next-word" copy-mode command, bound to "M-f" in
emacs-mode and to "w" in vi-mode, behaves more like vi's "e", which
skips to the next word-ending, than its "w", which skips to the next
word-beginning.
Also, the vi copy mode currently lacks vi's uppercased equ
