I'll put it in tonight.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:28:14PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: > Have you had a chance to look at this yet? (Just prodding) > > It's the vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff one; it introduced "non-whitespace" > word-skipping movement commands. > > I'd like this patch to get in before I start working on the numeric > command-prefix stuff, so I don't have to rework this patch to adjust for > those. And also so I can get to work on a patch to allow the user to > specify what qualifies as a delimiter for the purposes of movement-by-word. > > Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > I've committed the e diff, I'll look at the other one later on. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:09:44PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: > >> New version of the patch. It's now split into two separate diffs, and > >> meant to apply after your reworking of window_copy_cursor_next_word > >> (which isn't in Sourceforge CVS yet). As you requested, I used a copy of > >> that function, rather than introducing a flag (so the enum definition's > >> gone, too). > >> > >> Apologies if I missed anything from our earlier IRC conversation; the > >> logs are on my work laptop, and I didn't have access to them when I > >> reworked the patches. > >> > >> "vi-e-cmd.diff" applies first, followed by "vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff". Not > >> sure which order my mailer will put them in. > >> > >> -- > >> Micah J. Cowan > >> http://micah.cowan.name/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
