Re: applications opened in tmux never gain focus (OS X)

2013-02-09 Thread David Goodlad
On 08/02/2013, at 3:19 AM, Adam Kraut wrote: > Hi tmux folks, > > I'm having this issue on OS X 10.8.2. It happens in all versions of tmux I've > tried including HEAD. > > Any command that opens an OS X window within a tmux session does not gain > focus. Hi Adam I've seen the same thing wi

Re: One command to detach, showb, attach?

2010-12-28 Thread David Goodlad
I submitted that patch, originally from macports, to homebrew. It does have some issues with re-attaching sessions, so before upstreaming I wanted to sort those out. I'm going to have a play with it over the holidays, and will post when I've at least got it applying to HEAD. Dave On Wed, Dec 29,

Re: Layouts with "non-main" size specified

2010-12-15 Thread David Goodlad
Hi Nicholas On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Nicholas Marriott < nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > This looks fine, but thinking about it now I wonder if it might not be > better to finally modify resize-pane so you can specify an absolute > size. > > Then you could achieve the same effect by

Re: Layouts with "non-main" size specified

2010-12-08 Thread David Goodlad
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Nicholas Marriott < nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure :-). > Cool, here it is then! I've retained the original behaviour of the layout by default, but if the option other-pane-width is set, magic happens. I was unable to get the latest HEAD to compile her

Layouts with "non-main" size specified

2010-12-06 Thread David Goodlad
Hi all I use a layout similar to the built-in even-horizontal layout for the majority of my work: vim in the main pane on the left, and 2-3 small panes on the right for source control, logs, etc. Generally, I don't care about the specific width of the main pane, only that it's as wide as possible

Re: OSX 10.6.5 , Terminal.app, iTerm.app pbpaste, pbcopy do not work under tmux

2010-11-28 Thread David Goodlad
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:48 PM, kevin beckford wrote: > So > > we are saying that it's never going to work? > I stumbled upon this thread today, after having looked into this a couple of months ago and just now finally looking again; good timing! The patch that was linked earlier works nic