[TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS

2024-11-19 Thread aebe...@uwe.nsa.gov
The standalone ML-DSA-87 option specified in this draft is CNSA 2.0 compliant. There are no plans to support hybrid solutions for CNSA 2.0 (other than where required due to protocol constraints, such as during key establishment in IKEv2 as pointed out earlier in this thread). As such, our CNSA 2

[TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS

2024-11-20 Thread aebe...@uwe.nsa.gov
Hi all! To clarify, my draft I linked to (and future profiles) are instantiations of the CNSA 2.0 advisory and FAQ as it applies to specific protocols relevant to NSS; specifically, the drafts document how we expect vendors to configure protocols in a CNSA 2.0 compliant way. Cheers, Alie

[TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS

2024-11-21 Thread aebe...@uwe.nsa.gov
Yep I mistakenly forgot to change the category to "info" instead of "std". It will be fixed in a future update. Alie From: Andrey Jivsov Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 2:35 PM To: Eric Rescorla Cc: tls@ietf.org Subject: [TLS] Re: ML-DSA in TLS Given that t