My view:
It is very hard to say that PSK is stronger or weaker than Certificate in
authentcation. It depends on the key distribution adopted.
Certificate is suitable for one to many communication, in whcih case single
direction authentication is enough. Key distriution is cheap as there are a
Dear all
We have uploaded a personal draft on using identity as raw public key for
TLS/DTLS to TLS group website just now.
A pdf version is also attached in this email.
Your comments are appreciated.
Dr Yanjiang Yang, who is author of the draft, will attend the coming IETF 101
meeting. You
Hello, everyone,
To solve the complex issue caused by the certification, in RFC 7250, it is
recommended to use raw public for authentication.
However, when using RAW public directly for authentication, identity and public
key binding is required. That is, server need to maintain a large table to
Dear ilari,
Thanks very much for the reply :-）. Please see my comments inline below.
-Original Message-
From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:17 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc:
Subject: Re: [TLS] Regarding the identity bidding issue
Dear Benjamin,
See my comments below.
From: Benjamin Kaduk [bka...@akamai.com]
Sent: Sunday, 15 July, 2018 11:26:25 AM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc:
Subject: Re: [TLS] Regarding the identity bidding issue when using raw public
key with TLS
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018
Hi, all.
Regarding the raw public, I would like to contribute a few words for you to
think about it.
Raw public key is useful for IoT networks due to the constraint of bandwidth
and processing capability of devices. A normal certificate takes about a few
hundred bytes while an raw public key
Hi, Mounira
Just for clarification.
If I am not wrong, there are two types of certificates supported by 1609.2. One
is the legacy X.509 certificate, the other is the implicit certificate.
So for you draft submitted, you plan support both types of certificates or just
one of them, i.e. the X.
Hi, Mounira
Thanks for the clarification. That means both explicit and implicit
certificates will be supported.
Regards.
Haiguang
-Original Message-
From: Mounira Msahli [mailto:mounira.msa...@telecom-paristech.fr]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 4:32 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: Ilari
Hello, everyone
We have just updated the internet draft for "Using Identity as Raw Public Key
in Transport Layer Security (TLS)".
In this draft, we propose to use the Identity as raw public key, which further
simplifies authentication and identity management of large scale IoT devices.
The u
10:51 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] A new draft for "Using Identity as Raw Public Key in
Transport Layer Security (TLS)" has been updated
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 09:00:08AM +0000, Wang Haiguang wrote:
> Hello, everyone
>
> We have just updated the
RawPublicKey.
Best regards.
Haiguang
-Original Message-
From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2018 10:51 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] A new draft for "Using Identity as Raw Public Key in
Tran
ents on it.
Below is the link to the new draft:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-07.txt
Best regards.
Haiguang
-Original Message-
From: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 7:03 PM
To: Wang Haiguan
Hello, everyone.
Attached is an updated version to our personal draft on
draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10.
The target of the draft is to use identity as raw public key over TLS.
Idenitty-based signature (IBS) algorithms are used for peer/server
authentication.
The draft has been
:07 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10
I have taken an initial look at this draft [0]. Comments follow.
First the motivation for this technique appears rather
weak. Primarily, you argue that a PKI is complicated to implement and
this
:13:03 AM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:28 AM Wang Haiguang
mailto:wang.haiguang.shield...@huawei.com>>
wrote:
Hi, Eric
Thanks very much for your comments.
Please see my reply inline. Our draft is
technical point makes
you think that IBC is not raw public key.
Thanks very much.
Haiguang
From: Eric Rescorla [e...@rtfm.com]
Sent: Saturday, 23 March, 2019 7:30:50 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10
On
provisioned to both peer and server.
Regards.
Haiguang
From: Eric Rescorla [e...@rtfm.com]
Sent: Sunday, 24 March, 2019 1:02:05 AM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:57 AM Wang
they can enable this feature or patch the library.
Best regards.
Haiguang
From: Stephen Farrell [stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie]
Sent: Saturday, 23 March, 2019 2:24:03 AM
To: Eric Rescorla; Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang
of Melinda Shore
[melinda.sh...@nomountain.net]
Sent: Saturday, 23 March, 2019 5:12:20 PM
To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-10
On 3/22/19 7:28 AM, Wang Haiguang wrote:
> [HG] Regarding the revocation, we did not mention it in the draft, but
> w
existing browser/server kind of
communication. The intention is to use IBS for IoT networks.
From: Melinda Shore [melinda.sh...@nomountain.net]
Sent: Sunday, 24 March, 2019 9:46:44 PM
To: Wang Haiguang; tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-wang-tls-raw-public
Dear all,
A new version of draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc has been updated to
data tracker.
You can download it with following link:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-tls-raw-public-key-with-ibc-09.txt.
We have updated the draft based on the comments received from mailing list and
f
-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, 3 July, 2017 6:53 PM
To: Wang Haiguang; Wang Haiguang; Yang Yanjiang
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-tls-eccsi-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-wang-tls-eccsi-00.txt has been successfully
submitted by Haiguang Wang and posted to the IETF
: ilariliusva...@welho.com [mailto:ilariliusva...@welho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 July, 2017 7:22 PM
To: Wang Haiguang
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] An IETF draft on TLS based on ECCSI public key (RFC 6507)
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:47:16AM +, Wang Haiguang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This
raised by Ilari and highlighted the answer in
yellow collor.
We will continue our effort to improve the draft and will submit an updated
draft once we finished.
Regards.
Haiguang
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:47:16AM +, Wang Haiguang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This Haiguang Wang fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
