[TLS] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-03

2025-04-03 Thread Sean Turner via Datatracker
Sean Turner has requested publication of draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-03 as Informational on behalf of the TLS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile/ ___ TLS mailing list -- tls@i

[TLS] Re: Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-03

2025-04-03 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 03/04/2025 14:35, Sean Turner via Datatracker wrote: Sean Turner has requested publication of draft-ietf-tls- keylogfile-03 as Informational on behalf of the TLS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ doc/draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile/ Hang on - whe

[TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement forTLS 1.3

2025-04-03 Thread Alicja Kario
I support adoption of both ML-KEM drafts On Tuesday, 1 April 2025 14:58:01 CEST, Sean Turner wrote: We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls; see [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption call for the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS

[TLS] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

2025-04-03 Thread Yaakov Stein
> Even with Recommended=N, I can imagine many managers reacting to a > presentation on "YOU NEED TO USE PQC LIKE ML-KEM BECAUSE ELSE..." by googling > "deploy ML-KEM now" and being recommended this rather than a safer hybrid[1]. > I am not convinced that such a person, if given more knowledge, "

[TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

2025-04-03 Thread Joseph Birr-Pixton
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 14:00, Sean Turner wrote: > We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls; see > [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption call for > the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. > I support adoption, and we have

[TLS] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-11

2025-04-03 Thread Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker
Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola Review result: Has Nits This document updates the changes in RFC 8447 and requests IANA to make changes to a number of TLS and DTLS registries. In particular, it updates the "Recommended" column in TLS registries by defining a third value "D" for items that are discoura

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-wkech-07.txt

2025-04-03 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-wkech-07.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF. Title: A well-known URI for publishing service parameters Authors: Stephen Farrell Rich Salz Benjamin Schwartz Name:draft-ietf

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08.txt

2025-04-03 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF. Title: TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze Authors: Rich Salz Nimrod Aviram Name:draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-08.txt Pages: 6 Dates

[TLS] Inquiry regarding CT log policy, PKI transparency, and TLS coordination

2025-04-03 Thread Pepijn van der Stap
Dear team, I hope this message finds you well. I’m reaching out to ask whether your organisation provides any mailing lists, public coordination channels, or technical updates related to TLS, certificate transparency, trust infrastructure, or broader PKI operations. As an independent researche