> Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the individual
> I-Ds in question?
I suggest to call for adoption of
- draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem
- draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa
- draft-reddy-tls-composite-mldsa
- draft-reddy-tls-slhdsa
Personally, I don't think all of tho
> On Dec 17, 2024, at 07:22, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
>
> I would like to see adoption of all four documents and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ which was left
> out. I assume the latter was merely an oversight.
Yes, it was an oversight on my part.
spt
__
I would like to see adoption of all four documents
andhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ which was left
out. I assume the latter was merely an oversight.
Yes, it was an oversight on my part.
I support adoption of draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa._
I support the adoption call for all four drafts, with higher priority given
to the hybrid and pure key exchange drafts.
-Tiru
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 03:31, Sean Turner wrote:
> Note that there are three parts to this email; the “ask” is at the end.
>
> Requests:
>
> Ciphersuite discussions in t
I would like to see adoption of all four documents and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ which was left
out. I assume the latter was merely an oversight.
I think draft-reddy-tls-composite-mldsa (or more
precisely draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs) needs a lot of work. I
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL writes:
> How do you expect us to reach a consensus
Consensus on moving a hybrid PQ KEM forward? There's already WG adoption
of hybrid-design, and in general the mailing-list discussions make
hybrid PQ KEMs look like the easy case where there's ample support and
nobo
Can the WG chairs please clarify which procedure from RFC 2026 (or from
RFCs updating RFC 2026) is being followed here?
I have three reasons for asking for clarification. First: The question
in the message that began the thread can easily be read in two ways, and
the replies are split in the quest
I wrote:
> It's not that anyone has quoted an official
> NSA document prohibiting non-hybrid PQ.
Sorry, that should say "It's not that anyone has quoted an official NSA
document prohibiting hybrid PQ." Too many negations. :-)
At some point on the list there was a deceptive quote "Do not use a
hyb
I also support adoption.
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 17:49, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 2024, at 07:22, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
> >
> > I would like to see adoption of all four documents and
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ which was left
> > out. I assume
