On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 09:37:27PM +, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>This Message Is From an External Sender
>This message came from outside your organization.
>
>On ALPNs - Yes, this is something of an open question. There are some
>hints about this in draft-ietf-tls-esni, e.g. Sec
On ALPNs - Yes, this is something of an open question. There are some hints
about this in draft-ietf-tls-esni, e.g. Section 10.5: "A client that treats
this context as sensitive SHOULD NOT send context-specific values in
ClientHelloOuter.".
I've occasionally wondered if we would define an ECHC
Just a reminder that this adoption call is still on going.
spt
> On Oct 24, 2024, at 22:46, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> At the TLS meeting at IETF 119 we discussed the Large Record Sizes for TLS
> and DTLS I-D; see [0] and [1]. There has been some list discussion; see [2]
> and [3]. The I-D has be
Thanks Rich. These all look good to me.
spt
> On Oct 16, 2024, at 15:23, Salz, Rich
> wrote:
>
> This email starts the working group last call for "IANA Registry Updates for
> TLS and DTLS” I-D, located here:
>
> I found a few nits. Diff at https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/58/files
Hey Ben,
Responding in line:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 21:37, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> On ALPNs - Yes, this is something of an open question. There are some hints
> about this in draft-ietf-tls-esni, e.g. Section 10.5: "A client that treats
> this context as sensitive SHOULD NOT send context-speci
