[TLS] Re: [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: Re: AD review draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech

2024-10-19 Thread Erik Nygren
>From the server operator side, I feel strongly that the multi-CDN example should show a selected CDN setup not a merged CDN setup. The "Automation is required to keep these records consistent with the original records in the CDN providers' zones." mentioned in the current example is outside of the

[TLS] Re: Consensus call for RFC8773bis Formal Analysis Requirement

2024-10-19 Thread John Mattsson
Hi, I think this is a very straightforward way to introduce hybrid keying to TLS 1.3. I think this extension will increase the use of TLS 1.3 in national security systems, which I think is very welcome. This kind of hybrid keying / defense-in depth is exactly what is recommended in the excellen

[TLS] Re: TLS WG Interim summary (was Re: TLS WG Virtual Interim on FATT Process)

2024-10-19 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 18/10/2024 02:30, Sean Turner wrote: Whoops - Corrected! I'm still not seeing minutes? > The summary is that the process described in the slides is > basically the right shape. I'm either misinterpreting that or disagree with you. Not sure which. ISTM the concerns about anonymous influe

[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-extended-key-update-01.txt

2024-10-19 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-extended-key-update-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) WG of the IETF. Title: Extended Key Update for Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 Authors: Hannes Tschofenig Michael Tüxen Tirumaleswar