Issues
--
* tlswg/tls13-spec (+0/-0/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #1224 HRR server behavior is underspecified (1 by davidben)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1224 [discuss-vienna]
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls (+2/-0/💬0)
2 issues created:
- Remove discussion of
Ilari Liusvaara writes:
>Unfortunately, that does not work because it would require protocol
>modifications requiring coordinated updates to both clients and servers.
I was thinking of it more as a smoke-em-if-you-got-em option, since -LTS is by
negotiation it'd be something to the effect that i
Rob Sayre writes:
>Couldn't an implementation use data from a preexisting agreement in a
>conventional TLS handshake?
Yep, that's more or less TOFU then. TLS isn't supposed to do that though
because then it would look like it was SSH, or some reason like that.
I sketched out TOFU-for-TLS years
