Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> writes:

>Unfortunately, that does not work because it would require protocol
>modifications requiring coordinated updates to both clients and servers.

I was thinking of it more as a smoke-em-if-you-got-em option, since -LTS is by
negotiation it'd be something to the effect that if you're using -LTS then
you're covered, otherwise do X.

Peter.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to