Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> writes: >Unfortunately, that does not work because it would require protocol >modifications requiring coordinated updates to both clients and servers.
I was thinking of it more as a smoke-em-if-you-got-em option, since -LTS is by negotiation it'd be something to the effect that if you're using -LTS then you're covered, otherwise do X. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls