[TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Christopher Wood
The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official target for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's copy of the draft is below: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draf

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Rob Sayre
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:08 AM Christopher Wood wrote: > > What do other implementers think? > >From the Rustls perspective, I think it's fine. The project has been refactoring its handshake code, one benefit of which will be to make ECH integration easier. Ring [1], the crypto library the pr

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, On 24/02/2021 18:07, Christopher Wood wrote: The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official target for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's copy of the draft is below: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/d

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Christopher Patton
Hey Stephen, I'd imagine the CF server will stay at ECH-10 through IETF 110. Best, Chris P. On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:13 PM Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 24/02/2021 18:07, Christopher Wood wrote: > > The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official > target for in

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 24/02/2021 21:30, Christopher Patton wrote: Hey Stephen, I'd imagine the CF server will stay at ECH-10 through IETF 110. Great. If I don't get it working by then I probably never will:-) So, formally anointing -10 is ok whenever. Cheers, S. Best, Chris P. On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:1

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

2021-02-24 Thread Ben Schwartz
Maybe tag the git revision that you intend to publish as -10? On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 4:39 PM Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 24/02/2021 21:30, Christopher Patton wrote: > > Hey Stephen, I'd imagine the CF server will stay at ECH-10 through > > IETF 110. > > Great. If I don't get it working by t

Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Guidance for External PSK Usage in TLS"

2021-02-24 Thread Sean Turner
I have changed the tags on this draft to "WG Consenus: Waiting For Write-Up”. I will complete the Shepherd Write-Up, review it with the authors, and forward the I-D to our AD. spt > On Feb 20, 2021, at 20:27, Russ Housley wrote: > > Sean and Joe: > > The revision to address Ben' comments has