Hi Stephen,
This is currently #2 in my queue; I expect to have a non-preliminary review
this week.
Thank you for your patience, and the reminder,
Ben
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 02:21:07AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's now six and a bit months later. It's true those have
> been v
The TLS WG has placed draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Sean Turner)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc/
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https:
Hi!
The authors of "Return Routability Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3" have asked
for adoption of their draft as a WG item. Please state whether you support
adoption of this draft as a WG item by posting a message to the TLS list by
2359 UTC 06 August 2020. Please include any additional info
Not much of a DTLS user, but I respect that the authors are. I support
adoption and will review it.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
I'm OK with adoption.
That said, I believe that this falls a long way short of addressing the attacks
that I'm aware of. But that assumes we share an understanding about what those
attacks are. To begin with, we probably need a clearer description of goals.
To give an idea, address valida
One thing to add here: the chairs would like to hear active and
explicit support of the adoption. So please speak up if you believe
the draft is useful and the WG shall work on getting it published.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:35 AM Ron Bonica
wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>
>
> This email begins a Call For
Hello Martin,
Hello list,
> That said, I believe that this falls a long way short of addressing
the attacks that I'm aware of. But that assumes we share an
understanding about what those attacks are. To begin with, we probably
need a clearer description of goals.
Fully agreed. Unfortunately, t
