Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Russ Housley
Eric: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson > wrote: > I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The > extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. > > Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Russ Housley
Martin: > I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The > extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. > > There is one other piece to this that is very confusing, and less clear. > > "Servers which are authenticating with a PSK MUST NO

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:46 AM Russ Housley wrote: > Eric: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson wrote: > >> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. >> The extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not >> post_handshake_auth. >> > > Yes, although

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Russ Housley
Eric: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson > > wrote: >> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The >> extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. >> >> Yes, although 8773 actually is not super

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:24 AM Russ Housley wrote: > Eric: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson wrote: >> >>> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. >>> The extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not >>> post_handshake_auth. >>> >> >> Yes, a

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-04 Thread Russ Housley
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:37 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:24 AM Russ Housley > wrote: > Eric: > >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson >> > wrote: >>> I think that this is a useful erratum and it

Re: [TLS] 3rd WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticators

2020-06-04 Thread Sean Turner
Another reminder ... > On May 22, 2020, at 09:23, Sean Turner wrote: > > This is the 3rd WGLC for "Exported Authenticators in TLS" draft available at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator/. The > secdir review during IETF LC raised some issues and as a result