Eric: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net > <mailto:m...@lowentropy.net>> wrote: > I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The > extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. > > Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear about post-handshake, so > that's actually something we should clarify there.
RFC 8773 is not intended for post handshake. So, I never thought about that. What is the use case you are considering? Russ
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
