I have reviewed the changes. They look good. I have some reservations
about section 7 (implementation status) given that I expect it to date
badly, but it isn't really doing any actual harm either.
On 11 Apr. 2017 11:09 pm, "Sean Turner" wrote:
> All,
>
> draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revi
Subodh:
>
> @Russ there's some discussion about comparison with proxy certs in the
> current draft.
>
Yes, I saw the list of bullets in Section 5. I think that a TLS-specific
delegation is a good idea, but I do not agree with all of the points into
bullets. That said, we should not be hav
Hey Folks,
At the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago there was support in the room to adopt
draft-sullivan-tls-exported-authenticator [0]. We are looking for feedback
on adopting this draft form the list. Please respond if you support the
draft and are willing to review it. If you object to its adoption,
