I have reviewed the changes. They look good. I have some reservations about section 7 (implementation status) given that I expect it to date badly, but it isn't really doing any actual harm either.
On 11 Apr. 2017 11:09 pm, "Sean Turner" <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > All, > > draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we > agree with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review > the changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue > progressing the draft. Please review the differences from the -12 version > that went through WGLC and the latest version [0] and let us know by > 20170426 whether there is anything that would stop progression of the draft. > > Thanks, > > J&S > > [0] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls- > rfc4492bis-12&url2=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-16 > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
