All,
draft-ietf-tls-pwd [0] has been parked [1] by the WG chairs since late 2013.
It was parkedĀ by the WG chairs because there was no consensus to move the
document forward during WGLC [2][3]. However, circumstances have changed namely
the publication of Dragonfly Key Exchange RFC [4] and the
On Jun 27, 2016 7:38 AM, "Sean Turner" wrote:
>
> All,
>
> draft-ietf-tls-pwd [0] has been parked [1] by the WG chairs since late
2013. It was parked by the WG chairs because there was no consensus to
move the document forward during WGLC [2][3]. However, circumstances have
changed namely the pu
I don't think we should take this as a WG work item. I'd be happy for Dan
to get a code point
under the new rules, which I would also be happy to consider effective as
of now.
-Ekr
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Watson Ladd wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2016 7:38 AM, "Sean Turner" wrote:
> >
> > Al
