I don't think we should take this as a WG work item. I'd be happy for Dan
to get a code point
under the new rules, which I would also be happy to consider effective as
of now.

-Ekr


On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 27, 2016 7:38 AM, "Sean Turner" <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > draft-ietf-tls-pwd [0] has been parked [1] by the WG chairs since late
> 2013.  It was parked  by the WG chairs because there was no consensus to
> move the document forward during WGLC [2][3]. However, circumstances have
> changed namely the publication of Dragonfly Key Exchange RFC [4] and the
> proposed changes to the IANA registration rules for algorithm code points.
> In light of these two developments, the chairs want to revisit this
> decision and would like to know before 12 July if the WG wants to progress
> draft-ietf-pwd as a WG item to obtain algorithm code points under the new
> rules [5].
>
> Things have also changed in that JPAKE2 has a security proof IIUC. While
> the CFRG PAKE process has slowed, there are still a number of competing
> options here and I don't think "all of the above" is the right answer.
>
> >
> > Note that if the WG decides not to progress the draft the author will be
> free to pursue other publication paths, e.g., through the AD or the ISE.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > J&S
> >
> > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-pwd/
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6174/
> > [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aYIXwO8l4K8XdvUoW9ysHT8WzA0
> > [3]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Fep2-E7xQX7OQKzfxOoFInVFtm4
> > [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7664/
> > [5] Obviously, the draft needs to be revised in light of [3].
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to