On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 12:36 +, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> After a number of, uh, gentle reminders from people who have been
> waiting for
> this, I've finally got around to posting the TLS-LTS draft I
> mentioned a while
> back. It's now available as:
>
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gutmann-tl
Hi Sean,
Thanks for moving this along,
On 01/04/16 02:19, Sean Turner wrote:
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 05:56, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> Thanks for the speedy response...
>>
>> Again #3 below is what I care about, the other stuff isn't a big
>> deal.
>>
>> On 24/03/16 00:38,
> On Apr 01, 2016, at 01:07, Dave Garrett wrote:
>
> handwaves an informational RFC to standards track (RFC5289: ECC AES GCM)
This bit we “fix” by including what’s called a “DOWNREF" in the IETF LC, as per
RFC 3967.
spt
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@iet
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> 0) As described above: Get it approved by the IESG, hold it in RFC editor’s
> queue, and publish it as historic at the same time TLS 1.3 is published.
I'm not a fan of this option simply because
draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe has been stu
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> > Forward secrecy can be achieved using ephemeral Diffie-Hellman or
> > ephemeral Elliptic-Curve Diffie-Hellman ...
> >
> > If we summarize these in the Introduction we’re good?
>
> No, I'm on about missing text not placement of text. Aga
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Hugo Krawczyk
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> To make sure we’ve got a clear way forward coming out of our BA
>>> sessions, we need to make s
On 1 April 2016 at 03:46, Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>
>> > I believe Option #2 is simplest.
>>
>> I didn't mention this because I was composing on a phone at the time,
>> but we have to decide whether to allow a second attempt at 0-RTT. If
>> we do, then the effect is a two round trip setback. I th
On Friday, April 01, 2016 03:54:51 am Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 12:36 +, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> > After a number of, uh, gentle reminders from people who have been
> > waiting for
> > this, I've finally got around to posting the TLS-LTS draft I
> > mentioned a while
