On 1 April 2016 at 03:46, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com> wrote: > >> > I believe Option #2 is simplest. >> >> I didn't mention this because I was composing on a phone at the time, >> but we have to decide whether to allow a second attempt at 0-RTT. If >> we do, then the effect is a two round trip setback. I think that the >> odds of this happening are small, so I'm OK with it, but I wanted to >> highlight that. > > Not taking it could mix poorly with DTLS, as DTLS rejects need to be > stateless from server POV.
I thought that we'd already established that this is entirely possible. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
