Thanks Bob for pointing to the "real" ongoing specification of OPAQUE in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-03
and its careful specification of OPAQUE-3DH, including test vectors (and
sorry Scott for the typos in the other draft).
draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque is still work in process and
Sorry, I was thinking of the wrong draft. See:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-03#section-4.2.2
and
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-03#appendix-C
thanks,
Rob
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 6:08 AM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey
mailto:j...@salowey.net>> wrote:
There is at least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some
time [1].
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yCBYp10QuYPSu5zOoM3v84SAIZE/
I've found most of the OPAQUE drafts are pretty con
I support adoption. We've seen interest in adding PAKE to TLS several
times, including in RFC 5054, recent drafts, etc. Having the selected
PAKE from the CFRG in TLS is important.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much
> discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more
> discussion on the document before considering it for adoption.
>
The dra
I like the mechanism, and therefore support it’s adoption.
Regards,
Uri
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 12:18, Salz, Rich
> wrote:
>
>
> We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much
> discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more
> discussi
* We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much
discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more
discussion on the document before considering it for adoption. There is at
least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some
If this follows from the IETF PAKE selection, was OPAQUE-3DH proposed and
reviewed during the selection process?
https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/Candidates/OPAQUE.md
Cheers,
Feng
From: TLS on behalf of Joseph Salowey
Date: Wednesday, 31 March 2021 at 05:40
To:
Subject: [TL
