On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:39 PM Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net<mailto:j...@salowey.net>> wrote:
There is at least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some time [1]. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yCBYp10QuYPSu5zOoM3v84SAIZE/ I've found most of the OPAQUE drafts are pretty confusing / incorrect / or typo'd when it comes to lines like these. Describing these calculations seems difficult in ASCII, so I don't fault anyone for making mistakes here. The authors have also been pretty responsive in adding test vectors and such. If the answer is “it’s a typo”, that’s fine – I agree that RFCs are a horrid format for expressing equations. However, it would be good if there were to state what is the correct relationship here (and possibly update the draft with the corrected versions)
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
