> Requests to experts for published documents tends to come from IANA directly.
> But I think that your remedy is fine.
By my memory, about 80-90 percent come from IANA; some come directly to the TLS
experts and we have to remember to CC them into the thread. And requiring IANA
to forward the
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 07:16, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> This version incorporates all known issues. The authors believe this version
>> is ready for WGLC.
>
> Yes, pretty much. Two nits than can be fixed during AUTH48
>
> This sentence in Sec 15 confuses me:
> For this reason, designated exper
> This version incorporates all known issues. The authors believe this version
> is ready for WGLC.
Yes, pretty much. Two nits than can be fixed during AUTH48
This sentence in Sec 15 confuses me:
For this reason, designated experts should decline code point
registrations for documents
Hi! With author hat on,
This version incorporates all known issues. The authors believe this version
is ready for WGLC.
spt
> On Jan 23, 2024, at 13:43, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis-08.txt is now available. It is a work
> item of the Transport L
