On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, at 07:16, Salz, Rich wrote: >> This version incorporates all known issues. The authors believe this version >> is ready for WGLC. > > Yes, pretty much. Two nits than can be fixed during AUTH48 > > This sentence in Sec 15 confuses me: > For this reason, designated experts should decline code point > registrations for documents which have already been adopted or are > being proposed for adoption by IETF working groups or IRTF research > groups. > > Presumably, you want the RG/WG chair to make the request? Or do you > mean "other than the TLS WG" ?
Requests to experts for published documents tends to come from IANA directly. But I think that your remedy is fine. If the WG/RG has consensus to ask for a codepoint, then it is reasonable to allow the codepoint to be assigned. So maybe add "Experts can approve registrations if the working or research group reaches consensus about the need for code point assignment and the chairs of a group request assignment." _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
