Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

I support Kris, and would like to see codepoints added for MLKEM-512, MLKEM-768, and MLKEM-1024. -- V/R, Uri On 3/19/24, 00:11, "TLS on behalf of Kris Kwiatkowski" mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of k...@amongbytes.com > wrote: !--

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

Agreed with ekr. On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 6:27 PM Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 3:07 PM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL < > u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > >> Also, what are the WG's thoughts on including standalone PQC signatures >> in the same draft? >> >> >> >> I think that inclu

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 4:10 PM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL < u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > Also, what are the WG's thoughts on including standalone PQC signatures in > the same draft? > > > > I think that including standalone PQC sigs would be very desirable. > > > > I don't think there is any par

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

Also, what are the WG's thoughts on including standalone PQC signatures in the same draft? I think that including standalone PQC sigs would be very desirable. I don't think there is any particular reason to include PQC signatures in the same draft as PQ key establishment. In TLS 1.3, key

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 3:07 PM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL < u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > Also, what are the WG's thoughts on including standalone PQC signatures in > the same draft? > > > > I think that including standalone PQC sigs would be very desirable. > I don't think there is any particul

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

Also, what are the WG's thoughts on including standalone PQC signatures in the same draft? I think that including standalone PQC sigs would be very desirable. From: TLS On Behalf Of Deirdre Connolly Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2024 9:15 PM To: TLS@ietf.org Subject: [TLS] ML-KEM key agreeme

Re: [TLS] [EXT] Re: ML-KEM key agreement for TLS 1.3

I would like to see Deirdre’s request satisfied, and a full number assigned. Regards, Uri > On Mar 7, 2024, at 09:19, Salz, Rich > wrote: > >  > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside the Laboratory. > Back to the topic at hand. I think it'd very bad if we'd