work per day including week
end.
From: TLS on behalf of Eric Rescorla
Date: Saturday, 17 February 2024 at 19:56
To:
Subject: [TLS] Status of draft-ietf-tls-esni
Hi folks,
I wanted to provide an update on draft-ietf-tls-esni. I went through
all existing PRs and issues as well as some of the
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 10:57 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> ISSUES
> * 866: Server retry flow, section 7.1 [Robert Sayre]
> I'm not seeing support for a change here, so I propose to
> close unless someone provides a PR that receives some
> support.
>
I agree, I'm in the rough on this one. Howe
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:09 AM Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2024 18:56, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I should be able to spin a WGLC-ready version of ECH before the
> > draft deadline.
>
> Good stuff, thanks. I'll plan to review the proposed
> changes with a strong bias for not asking for
On 17/02/2024 18:56, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I should be able to spin a WGLC-ready version of ECH before the
draft deadline.
Good stuff, thanks. I'll plan to review the proposed
changes with a strong bias for not asking for more:-)
Cheers,
S.
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPG
Hi folks,
I wanted to provide an update on draft-ietf-tls-esni. I went through
all existing PRs and issues as well as some of the recent list
discussion. This message provides a summary of the status:
PRs
* 594: A first proposal to fix the no-sni section [Arnaud Taddei]
I think this is fine and
