Good. I will try to clarify. PRs welcome
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Nick Harper wrote:
> That's my assumption as well.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> I was assuming that there were two exporters:
>>
>> Export() --> the same API as in 1.2 and computed as descr
That's my assumption as well.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I was assuming that there were two exporters:
>
> Export() --> the same API as in 1.2 and computed as described here
> Export0RTT -> A new API that computes the early_exporter.
>
>
> -Ekr
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016
I was assuming that there were two exporters:
Export() --> the same API as in 1.2 and computed as described here
Export0RTT -> A new API that computes the early_exporter.
-Ekr
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Nick Harper wrote:
> Does the wording of this PR mean that the value from the exporte
Please see the following PR:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/673
This includes various changes to make exporters/resumption work better.
Basically:
1. Add a 0-RTT exporter and change the transcript for the regular exporter
so it
only includes the transcript up to ServerFinished. Th
