Re: [TLS] Closing DTLS 1.3 PRs

2021-01-21 Thread Sean Turner
Thanks from me as well. There are a couple of I-D pinned on this [1] and I have been pinged a couple of times on the publication date for references from other SDOs. spt [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C321 > On Jan 20, 2021, at 13:58, Christopher Wood wrote: > > The cons

Re: [TLS] Closing DTLS 1.3 PRs

2021-01-20 Thread Christopher Wood
The consensus call is now complete. Thanks to everyone who left feedback and suggestions for improvement! All PRs have been merged and a new version of the draft was submitted. We'll continue moving this document through the publication process now. Best, Chris On Thu, Jan 7, 2021, at 1:33 PM

Re: [TLS] Closing DTLS 1.3 PRs

2021-01-07 Thread Christopher Wood
Adding one more to this list: - Added text regarding the legacy_session_id field (#202) Best, Chris On Mon, Jan 4, 2021, at 8:21 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > There are currently 12 open PRs [1] against the DTLS 1.3 specification > generated in response to Ben's review [2]: > > - Require that

[TLS] Closing DTLS 1.3 PRs

2021-01-04 Thread Christopher Wood
There are currently 12 open PRs [1] against the DTLS 1.3 specification generated in response to Ben's review [2]: - Require that cipher suites define a record number encryption algorithm (#166) - PMTU estimates (#168) - Updates to cookie text (#169) - Clarify buffering and retransmission requirem