There are currently 12 open PRs [1] against the DTLS 1.3 specification generated in response to Ben's review [2]:
- Require that cipher suites define a record number encryption algorithm (#166) - PMTU estimates (#168) - Updates to cookie text (#169) - Clarify buffering and retransmission requirements (#171) - Relax age out text (#172) - Records with bogus epochs should be discarded, not generate alerts (#177) - RCID excessive (#179) - Alerts are unreliable (#180) - Rationale for spare CIDs (#185) - Forbid going from an empty CID to a non-empty CID (#194) - Clarify mixing sequence and length settings on the same connection (#195) - Use DTLS style version values, even for DTLS 1.3 (#196) Please have a look and provide feedback! Barring objections, we plan to merge these on Monday, January 18. We'll then cut a new version of the draft and move forward. Best, Chris, for the chairs [1] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Aconsensus-needed [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/FJM6OHfvLJP_pF5uUcR86pzrdYo/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
