Hiya,
On 04/03/2020 03:36, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> The chairs are moving forward with accepting the document as a working
> group item without any additional constraints except that the document MUST
> be evaluated for potential incompatibilities with NIST competition entries
> before WGLC.
That
The call for adoption has been completed. It's clear that the draft needs
work, but most of the comments were positive on adoption and there seems to
be energy to work on the document. The main concern raised during the call
for adoption if it is published before the NIST competition is finished
th
use weaker crypto, to stop improving
crypto.
Best regards,
Dan Brown
BlackBerry
From: TLS On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:13 PM
To:
Subject: [TLS] Call for Adoption: draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange&quo
I support adoption
From: TLS On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:13 PM
To:
Subject: [TLS] Call for Adoption: draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange" have asked for adoption of their draft as
a WG item. Please state w
I would like to see this work adopted by the working group. I think the
language issues can be addressed after adoption.
However, given the disagreements raised, I would also be okay if the
adoption decision was postponed until after discussion in Vancouver.
Jonathan
On Thu., Feb. 13, 2020, 4:29
Hi,
I support adoption of this document.
Regards,
Valery Smyslov.
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 8:13 PM
To:
Subject: [TLS] Call for Adoption: draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
The authors of "Hybri
I also support adoption of this draft. The concerns raised in the other thread
on this topic ([TLS] Requesting working group adoption of
draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design) are irrelevant within the context of adopting
an informational draft, as it would be a "timely publication" of "general
infor
I'm in favor of adopting this work.
Nick
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Joseph Salowey wrote:
> The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange" have asked for adoption of their
> draft as a WG item. Please state whether you support adoption of this
> draft as a WG item by posting a message to the TLS li
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020, at 06:00, Salz, Rich wrote:
> >I think the draft would be ok to adopt if we don't finish
> it until the outcome from the NIST competition is known.
> Otherwise I would be against adoption.
>
> I think I agree with this, but am not sure. Can we have this on the
>I think the draft would be ok to adopt if we don't finish
it until the outcome from the NIST competition is known.
Otherwise I would be against adoption.
I think I agree with this, but am not sure. Can we have this on the agenda for
Vancouver?
_
I support its adoption.
From: TLS on behalf of Joseph Salowey
Date: Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 12:13 PM
To: ""
Subject: [TLS] Call for Adoption: draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange" have asked for adoption of their draft as
a WG
Hiya,
I said this in the other thread but I'll repeat a call
for a bit of clarity that's not normally needed:
On 13/02/2020 17:12, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> Adopting the draft means the working group thinks the topic is a good idea
> and the draft is a good place to start the work.
I think the dr
The authors of "Hybrid Key Exchange" have asked for adoption of their draft
as a WG item. Please state whether you support adoption of this draft as a
WG item by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 28 February 2020.
Please include any additional information that is helpful in understandi
13 matches
Mail list logo
